Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 165-169 , August 2002

Quality assessment of ERCP

References 

  1. ASGE Ad Hoc Committee on Outcomes Research . Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:827–830
  2. ASGE . Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;38:743–746
  3. Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch S, Affronti J, Browning CL, Bute BP. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence: a prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:983–989
  4. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes JA, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, et al.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393
  5. Eisen GM, deGarmo P, Brodner R, Lieberman DA. Can the ASA grade predict the risk of endoscopic complications? [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:AB142
  6. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–918
  7. ASGE . Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:831–837
  8. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:535–539
  9. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Eisen GM, DiSario JA, Snady HW, Overby CS, et al.  Failures and complications of attempted therapeutic ERCP: impact on outcomes and costs [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:AB114

PII: S0016-5107(02)70172-7

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 165-169 , August 2002

Article Tools