Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 488-498, October 2005

Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial

Current affiliations: Thompson Cancer Survival Center, Knoxville, Tennessee; Columbia-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas; Washington State University Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; GI Pathology Partners, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Axcan Pharma Inc, Mont-Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada

Received 24 November 2004; accepted 13 June 2005.

Toronto, Ontario; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lille, France; Gloucester, Liverpool, UK; Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; Buffalo, New York; Burlington, Vermont; Chicago, Illinois; Cleveland, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Durham, North Carolina; Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; Knoxville, Tennessee; Louisville, Kentucky; New York, New York; Orange, California; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Richmond, Virginia; Rochester, Minnesota; Salt Lake City, Utah; Sarasota, Florida; Seattle, Washington; Valhalla, New York, USA

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE) may lead to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma. The objective was to examine the impact of treating patients with BE and with HGD by using porfimer sodium (POR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for ablating HGD and reducing the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The design was a multicenter, partially blinded (pathology), randomized clinical trial conducted in patients with BE who have HGD. There were 30 contributing centers. A total of 485 patients were screened, with 208 in the intent-to-treat population and 202 in the safety population. Patients were randomized on a 2:1 basis to compare PDT with POR plus omeprazole (PORPDT) with omeprazole only (OM). The main outcome measurement was complete HGD ablation occurring at any time during the study period.

Results

There was a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in favor of PORPDT (106/138 [77%]) compared with OM (27/70 [39%]) in complete ablation of HGD at any time during the study period. The occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the PORPDT group (13%) (n=18) was significantly lower (p < 0.006) compared with the OM group (20%) (n=20). The safety profile showed 94% of patients in the PORPDT group and 13% of patients in the OM group had treatment-related adverse effects. The limitations of the study were that PDT therapy may have had to be applied more than once and that patients spent more time in treatment. The patients and the physicians were not blinded to the treatment.

Conclusions

PORPDT in conjunction with omeprazole is an effective therapy for ablating HGD in patients with BE and in reducing the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 See CME section; p. 584.

PII: S0016-5107(05)02349-7

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.047

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy February 2006 (Vol. 63, Issue 2, Page 359)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 488-498, October 2005