« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 67, Issue 7
, Pages 1139-1146
, June 2008
A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers
References
- Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–560
- S3-Guidelines conference “colorectal carcinoma” 2004. [German] Z Gastroenterol. 2004;42:1129–1177
- . Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1781–1790
- Acceptance and findings of the first nationwide screening colonoscopy round in Germany. [abstract] Gastroenterology. 2005;128:A96
- Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:354–360
- Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:280–287
- . Sedation and the technical performance of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2005;15:661–672
- Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study. Endoscopy. 2005;37:1123–1126
- Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy. 2006;38:739–742
- A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:75–81
- CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38:209–213
- In vitro evaluation of forces exerted by a new computer-assisted colonoscope (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System). Endoscopy. 2006;38:1224–1229
- Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide endoscopy system): results of the first human clinical trial (“PACE study”). Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:261–266
- The Aer-O-Scope: proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model. Endoscopy. 2006;38:144–148
- The Aer-O-Scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:672–677
- Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:963–970
- . PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:971–977
- Proof of concept study of the Aer-O-Scope omni-directional colonoscopic viewing system in ex-vivo and in-vivo porcine models. Endoscopy. 2007;39:412–417
- . Recent advances in epidemiology and prevention of gastrointestinal endoscopy related infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:326–330
- Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories—an international comparison of guidelines. [German] Z Gastroenterol. 2002;40:531–542
- ASGE technology status evaluation report: automatic endoscope reprocessors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:925–927
- HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology—endoscope reprocessing): study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting. [German] Z Gastroenterol. 2002;40:157–170
- Mandatory hygiene control as a key of decreasing failures of endoscopic reprocessing in ambulatory care. [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:P118
- . Endoscope reprocessing and repair costs. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2004;14:717–724
- Quality assurance in coloscopy in private practice and the hospital: the Gastroenterology Quality Circle (GEQC) Munich. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1996;121:1040–1045
- A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut. 2004;53:277–283
- . Screening colonoscopy among persons 50 to 60 years of age with and without familial risk of colorectal cancer—a prospective multicenter trial. [German] Z Gastroenterol. 2003;41:1077–1082
- . The nurse colonoscopist—training and quality assurance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2005;15:829–837
- Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350
- Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy. 2006;38:456–460
- Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38:218–225
- Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541
- Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1410–1415
PII: S0016-5107(07)03053-2
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.065
© 2008 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 67, Issue 7
, Pages 1139-1146
, June 2008
