Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 70, Issue 5 , Pages 835-845.e2 , November 2009

Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study

Received 12 November 2008 ,Accepted 3 January 2009.

References 

  1. Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:302–309
  2. Guidelines on complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. British Society of Gastroenterology. 2006;Available at: http://www.bsg.org.ukAccessed July 24, 2008
  3. Hernandez LV, Jacobson JW, Harris MS. Comparison among the perforation rates of Maloney, balloon, and savary dilatation of esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:460–462
  4. Anderson PE, Cook A, Amery AH. A review of the practice of fibreoptic endoscopic dilatation of oesophageal stricture. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989;71:124–127
  5. Riley SA, Attwood SE. Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut. 2004;53(Suppl 1):i1–i6
  6. Jenkins JT, Glass G, Ballantyne S, Fullarton GM. Effect of MRCP introduction on ERCP practice: are there implications for service and training?. Gut. 2006;55:1365–1366
  7. Atkinson RJ, Donnelly MT. Oesophageal stenting: trends in training in the UK. Endoscopy. 2006;38(Suppl II):A162
  8. Baillie J. ERCP training: for the few, not for all. Gut. 1999;45:9–10
  9. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:831–837
  10. Axon AT, Aabakken L, Malfertheiner P, et al. Recommendations of the ESGE workshop on Ethics in Teaching and Learning Endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003. Endoscopy. 2003;35:761–764
  11. Maiss J, Prat F, Wiesnet J, et al. The complementary Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis—the French training project: a prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:1217–1225
  12. Maiss J, Wiesnet J, Proeschel A, et al. Objective benefit of a 1-day training course in endoscopic hemostasis using the “compactEASIE” endoscopy simulator. Endoscopy. 2005;37:552–558
  13. Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J, et al. Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:204–215
  14. Maiss J, Millermann L, Heinemann K, et al. The compactEASIE is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: a prospective randomised trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:70–80
  15. Matthes K. Simulator training in endoscopic hemostasis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;16:511–527viii
  16. General Recommendations on Training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. 2008;Available at: http://www.thejag.org.uk/Whoareyou/Individualsintraining/tabid/57/Default.aspxAccessed September 23, 2008
  17. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84:273–278
  18. Endoscopy National Workforce Competence. Skills for Health. 2008;Available at: http://tools.skillsforhealth.org.uk/suite/show/id/36Accessed September 23, 2008
  19. Emken JL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Training and assessment of laparoscopic skills. JSLS. 2004;8:195–199
  20. Fried GM. Lessons from the surgical experience with simulators: incorporation into training and utilization in determining competency. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;16:425–434
  21. Thomas-Gibson S, Bassett P, Suzuki N, et al. Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy. 2007;39:818–824
  22. Adamsen S. Simulators and gastrointestinal endoscopy training. Endoscopy. 2000;32:895–897
  23. Gerson LB. Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;16:489–509vii-viii
  24. Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:361–368
  25. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:33–37
  26. Kiesslich R, Moenk S, Reinhardt K, et al. Combined simulation training: a new concept and workshop is useful for crisis management in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Z Gastroenterol. 2005;43:1031–1039
  27. Neumann M, Mayer G, Ell C, et al. The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy. 2000;32:906–910
  28. Sedlack R, Petersen B, Binmoeller K, Kolars J. A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:886–890
  29. Hochberger J, Euler K, Naegel A, Hahn EG, Maiss J. The compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy: a prospective comparison in structured team-training courses on “endoscopic hemostasis” for doctors and nurses to the “Endo-Trainer” model. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:895–902
  30. Goff B, Mandel L, Lentz G, et al. Assessment of resident surgical skills: is testing feasible?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1331–1340
  31. Ault G, Reznick R, MacRae H, et al. Exporting a technical skills evaluation technology to other sites. Am J Surg. 2001;182:254–256
  32. Bann S, Khan M, Datta V, Darzi A. Surgical skill is predicted by the ability to detect errors. Am J Surg. 2005;189:412–415
  33. Broe D, Ridgway PF, Johnson S, et al. Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:900–904
  34. Datta V, Bann S, Mandalia M, et al. The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills assessment. Am J Surg. 2006;192:372–378
  35. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, et al. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg. 2002;184:70–73
  36. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, et al. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med. 1996;71:1363–1365
  37. Goff BA, VanBlaricom A, Mandel L, et al. Comparison of objective, structured assessment of technical skills with a virtual reality hysteroscopy trainer and standard latex hysteroscopy model. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:407–412
  38. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:372–378
  39. Immenroth M, Burger T, Brenner J, et al. Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:385–391
  40. Kohls-Gatzoulis JA, Regehr G, Hutchison C. Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study. Can J Surg. 2004;47:277–283
  41. Lentz GM, Mandel LS, Goff BA. A six-year study of surgical teaching and skills evaluation for obstetric/gynecologic residents in porcine and inanimate surgical models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:2056–2061
  42. Nielsen PE, Foglia LM, Mandel LS, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skills for episiotomy repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1257–1260
  43. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg. 1997;173:226–230
  44. Haycock A, Suzuki N, Thomas-Gibson S. Development of a novel video scoring system for basic polypectomy: an initial validation study. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:AB329

 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact him at ahaycock@imperial.ac.uk.

PII: S0016-5107(09)00004-2

doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.001

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 70, Issue 5 , Pages 835-845.e2 , November 2009