« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 2
, Pages 335-341
, February 2010
Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing
References
- Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1357–1367
- . Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?. Endoscopy. 2008;40:523–528
- Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350
- Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352–359
- Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:41–48
- . How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality?. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:50–52
- . Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1941–1945
- Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541
- Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:965–971
- . Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;107:856–861
- Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1247–1256
- Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance. Endoscopy. 2008;40:422–427
- Screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test: results of the second round compared with those of the first round in one French district. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-182
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–1471
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–1477
- Reduction in colorectal cancer mortality by fecal occult blood screening in a French controlled study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1674–1680
- Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:82–90
- Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2009;58:530–535
- Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2004 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2006;30(Suppl 3):39–48
- French colorectal cancer screening programme: results of the first round. J Med Screen. 2008;15:143–148
- . Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1091–1098
- Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time ≥7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1892–1898
- Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384
- . Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79
- . Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2866–2877
- Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population. Gut. 2007;56:210–214
- Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8
DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
PII: S0016-5107(09)02432-8
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.032
© 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 2
, Pages 335-341
, February 2010
