« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 3
, Pages 542-550
, March 2010
Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group
References
- Cancer Statistics, 2009. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249
- Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296–1308
- . Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–637
- American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750
- Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160
- Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–1885
- Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:125–127
- Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–28
- Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systemic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350
- Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290
- Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–1035
- Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:41–48
- Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352–359
- Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:385–391
- Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3182–3185
- Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:452–456
- A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:139–144
- . A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2008;40:478–482
- A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:551–556
- . Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:482–486
- . Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79
- Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384
- . Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:33–36
- Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541
- . Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1941–1945
- Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:965–971
- Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1149–1155
- Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168
- . Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2866–2877
- . Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:497–502
Disclosure The following author disclosed a financial relationship relevant to this publication: D.C. DeMarco: Consultant for Spirus Medical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Current affiliations: Baylor University Medical Center (D.C.D, E.O., L.F.L., J.K.H., D.P.), Dallas, Texas, North Hills Hospital (D.B.), North Richland Hills, Texas, S.W. Fort Worth Endoscopy Center (C.H. T.D., T.M.D.), Fort Worth, Texas, Hennepin County Medical Center (T.K., K.G.), Minneapolis, Minnesota, University of Texas Southwestern (L.W.), Dallas, Texas, NorthShore University HealthSystem (M.K.M.), Evanston, Illinois, Florida Hospital (M.B.A.), Celebration, Florida, University of Massachusetts (R.P.), Worcester, Massachusetts, University of Chicago (K.G.R., I.H.), Chicago, Illinois.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr. DeMarco at DanielD@BaylorHealth.edu.
PII: S0016-5107(09)02887-9
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021
© 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 3
, Pages 542-550
, March 2010
