Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 601-605, May 2004

Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones

Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Received 14 August 2003; received in revised form 11 December 2003; accepted 27 January 2004.

New Delhi, India

Abstract 

Background

Mechanical lithotripsy is used to break large bile duct stones. This study investigated the predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy.

Methods

Consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and basket removal of stones. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed for stones of large size (>15 mm diameter) that precluded extraction intact. Success was defined as complete clearance of the duct. Various predictive factors, including size and number of stones, stone impaction, serum bilirubin, presence of cholangitis, and bile duct diameter were analyzed in relation to the success or failure of lithotripsy.

Results

A total of 669 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis, which was found in 401 patients. Of the latter patients, 87 had large stones that required mechanical lithotripsy. Lithotripsy was successful in 69 (79%) patients. Impaction of the stone(s) in the bile duct was the only significant factor that predicted failure of lithotripsy and consequent failure of bile duct clearance. Other factors, including stone size, were not significant.

Conclusions

Mechanical lithotripsy is successful in about 79% of patients with large bile duct stones. The only significant factor that predicts failure of mechanical lithotripsy is stone impaction in the bile duct.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper was presented at the Digestive Diseases Week, May 18-21, 2003, Orlando, Florida (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:AB194).

PII: S0016-5107(04)00295-0

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 601-605, May 2004