Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 35-39, January 2008

Endoscopic hemostasis by using the TriClip for peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a pilot study

Current affiliations: Combined Endoscopy Unit, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong, SAR, China

Received 10 April 2006; accepted 4 May 2007. published online 18 October 2007.

Hong Kong, China

Background

The feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the TriClip in the management of peptic ulcer hemorrhage in human beings are scarcely reported in the literature.

Objective

A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the TriClip endoscopic clipping device in the control of peptic ulcer hemorrhage.

Design

Prospective evaluation.

Setting

Regional government hospital.

Patients

From July 2004 to January 2005, patients older than 16 years and with Forrest type I and IIa peptic ulcer hemorrhages were included in the study.

Interventions

TriClips were used for initial hemostasis. Salvage procedures, including adrenalin injection, heat probe application, argon plasma coagulation, or surgery will be carried out appropriately if TriClip failed to control bleeding alone. An endoscopy was repeated 24 hours later for the security of the TriClip and for any endoscopic evidence of recurrent bleeding. A follow-up endoscopy was performed 8 weeks later to assess ulcer healing.

Main Outcome Measurements

Procedure time, successful hemostatic rate, number of clips used, ulcer recurrent bleeding rate, complications, and ulcer healing rate were measured.

Limitations

No comparative arm; pilot study only.

Result

A total of 27 cases (11 women, 16 men) were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years (range 18-88 years). There were 19 cases of duodenal ulcer and 8 cases of gastric ulcer, with median size of 8 mm (range 2-20 mm). The rate of successful hemostasis in the first endoscopy by TriClips alone was 81.5% (22/27), with a median procedure time of 10 minutes (range 3-30 minutes). In the second endoscopy, the endoscopic recurrent bleeding rate was 14.8% (4/27) and the TriClips were found dislodged in 11 patients (40.7%). The permanent hemostasis rate was 67% (18/27). The overall failure rate was 33% (9/27). Three patients required blood transfusion before the first endoscopy. There was no morbidity or mortality observed in all cases. All ulcers healed after 8 weeks.

Conclusions

The use of the TriClip is feasible in the initial control of peptic ulcer hemorrhage. However, we could not detect any obvious advantages in arresting bleeding vessels by using this new clipping device.

Abbreviations: DU, duodenal ulcer, GU, gastric ulcer, H pylori, Helicobacter pylori, Ia, ulcer with spurter, Ib, ulcer with active oozing, IIa, ulcer with thrombosed vessel seen, RUT, rapid urease test

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0016-5107(07)02040-8

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.042

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 35-39, January 2008