Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 68, Issue 3 , Pages 422-431, September 2008

Is all ineffective esophageal motility the same? A clinical and high-frequency intraluminal US study

Current affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine (J.H.K.), Konkuk University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine (P.-L.R., H.J.S., K.J.S., J.J.K., J.C.R.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Received 2 November 2006; accepted 12 November 2007. published online 31 March 2008.

Seoul, Korea

Background

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is characterized by frequent hypotensive or failed peristaltic contractions; its pathophysiology is controversial.

Objective

To evaluate whether patients with IEM because of GERD would differ from patients with other etiologies of IEM on the basis of esophageal-muscle thickness measured by high-frequency intraluminal US (HFIUS).

Design

Single-center prospective study.

Setting

Academic medical center; from January 2004 to June 2005.

Subjects

A total of 46 patients who were newly diagnosed with IEM were classified into 2 groups: GERD-related IEM (group I, n = 26) and non-GERD–related IEM (group II, n = 20) on the basis of the presence of reflux esophagitis and/or pathologic acid exposure by 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. In addition, 16 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with no reflux esophagitis, normal manometric finding, and normal level of acid exposure were included as controls.

Main Outcome Measurements

We compared the clinical characteristics, including a predominant principal esophageal symptom and the results from HFIUS among the control, GERD-related IEM (group I), and non-GERD–related IEM (group II) groups.

Results

The proportion of typical reflux symptom as a predominant symptom was higher in group I (66%) than in group II (25%). Muscle thickness was greater in group II than in group I and the control group during both the baseline rest period and the peak of contraction period at all levels of the middle of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and 3 cm and 9 cm above the LES (respectively) (P < .05).

Limitation

The limitation was the small sample size.

Conclusions

Patients with non-GERD–related IEM had increased muscle thickness on HFIUS compared with patients with GERD-related IEM and the controls. Based on this study, IEM is not necessarily indicative of GERD.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index, DES, diffuse esophageal spasm, HFIUS, high-frequency intraluminal US, IEM, ineffective esophageal motility, LES, lower-esophageal sphincter, NCCP, noncardiac chest pain, VAS, visual analog scale

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0016-5107(07)03117-3

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.039

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 68, Issue 3 , Pages 422-431, September 2008