Cost-effectiveness analysis of management strategies for obscure GI bleeding
Background and Aims
Of patients who are seen with GI hemorrhage, approximately 5% will have a small-bowel source. Management of these patients entails considerable expense. We performed a decision analysis to explore the optimal management strategy for obscure GI hemorrhage.
Methods
We used a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare no therapy (reference arm) to 5 competing modalities for a 50-year-old patient with obscure overt bleeding: (1) push enteroscopy, (2) intraoperative enteroscopy, (3) angiography, (4) initial anterograde double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) followed by retrograde DBE if the patient had ongoing bleeding, and (5) small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) followed by DBE guided by the CE findings. The model included prevalence rates for small-bowel lesions, sensitivity for each intervention, and the probability of spontaneous bleeding cessation. We examined total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) over a 1-year time period.
Results
An initial DBE was the most cost-effective approach. The no-therapy arm cost $532 and was associated with 0.870 QALYs compared with $2407 and 0.956 QALYs for the DBE approach, which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $20,833 per QALY gained. Compared to the DBE approach, an initial CE was more costly and less effective. The initial DBE arm resulted in an 86% bleeding cessation rate compared to 76% for the CE arm and 59% for the no-therapy arm. The model results were robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.
Limitations
The short time horizon of the model, because of the lack of long-term data about the natural history of rebleeding from small-intestinal lesions.
Conclusions
An initial DBE is a cost-effective approach for patients with obscure bleeding. However, capsule-directed DBE may be associated with better long-term outcomes because of the potential for fewer complications and decreased utilization of endoscopic resources.
Abbreviations: AVM, arteriovenous malformation, CE, capsule endoscopy, CPT, current procedural terminology code, DBE, double-balloon enteroscopy, ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, QALY, quality-adjusted life year, QOL, quality of life, RBC, red blood cell
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented at American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Digestive Disease Week, May 21-24, 2006, Los Angeles, California (Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:AB90).
PII: S0016-5107(08)00162-4
doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.035
© 2008 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
