Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 69, Issue 4 , Pages 835-842, April 2009

A prospective randomized trial of 1 versus 2 injections during EUS-guided celiac plexus block for chronic pancreatitis pain

Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (J.L., J.D., K.M., M.S., L.M., S.S., T.I.), Regenstrief Institute (T.I.), Internal Medicine (W.O.), Division of Biostatistics (C.J.), Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Received 2 January 2008; accepted 27 May 2008. published online 12 January 2009.

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Background

The efficacy of 1-injection versus a 2-injections method of EUS-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB) in patients with chronic pancreatitis is not known.

Objective

To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of EUS-CPB by using 1 versus 2 injections in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pain. The secondary aim is to identify factors that predict responsiveness.

Design

A prospective randomized study.

Interventions

EUS-CPB was performed by using bupivacaine and triamcinolone injected into 1 or 2 sites at the level of the celiac trunk during a single EUS-CPB procedure.

Main Outcome Measurements

Duration of pain relief, onset of pain relief, and complications.

Results

Fifty-one subjects were enrolled (23 received 1 injection, 28 received 2 injections). Pain relief, which lasted a mean of 51.3 days (median 28 days, range 1-203 days) was observed in 28 subjects (55%). Thirteen of 23 subjects who received 1 injection (56.5%) had relief from pain compared with 15 of 28 subjects who received 2 injections (53.6%) (P = .8). The median times to onset in the 1-injection and 2-injections groups were 21 and 14 days, respectively (P = .99). No correlation existed between duration of pain relief and time to onset of pain relief or onset within 24 hours. Age, sex, race, prior EUS-CPB, and smoking or alcohol history did not predict duration of pain relief.

Limitation

Telephone interviewers were not blinded.

Conclusions

There was no difference in duration of pain relief or onset of pain relief in subjects with chronic pancreatitis and pain when the same total amount of medication was delivered in 1 or 2 injections during a single EUS-CPB procedure. Both methods were safe.

Abbreviations: EUS-CPB, EUS-guided celiac plexus block, EUS-CPN, EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis, IV, intravenous

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

 If you want to chat with an author of this article, you may contact her at juleblan@iupui.edu.

PII: S0016-5107(08)02045-2

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.071

Refers to erratum:

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 69, Issue 4 , Pages 835-842, April 2009