Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1215-1219, December 2008

Modified technique for EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscess (with video)

Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology (J.M.T., S.V.), Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (E.R.D.), University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Received 7 May 2008; accepted 6 July 2008.

Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Background

We previously described a technique for EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscess by means of transrectal catheter placement. However, drainage catheters are prone to accidental dislodgement, and their management has mandated a prolonged inpatient hospital stay.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a combined technique by using EUS-guided transrectal drainage catheter and stent placement for management of patients with pelvic abscesses.

Design

An observational study.

Setting

Academic tertiary-referral center.

Patients

Four patients underwent EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses that were not amenable for drainage by US and/or CT guidance.

Interventions

A 10F drainage catheter and one or two 7F double-pigtail stents were deployed in the abscess cavity under EUS guidance. Subsequently, the drainage catheter was periodically flushed and aspirated for 36 hours until improvement in size of the abscess was confirmed by CT imaging. The drainage catheter was then discontinued, and the patients were discharged from the hospital. If resolution of the abscess was noted on outpatient CT at 2 weeks, then the stents were retrieved by sigmoidoscopy.

Main Outcomes Measurements

Short-term treatment success was defined as improvement in clinical symptoms and a decrease in size of the pelvic abscess on postprocedure CT obtained at 36 hours. Medium-term treatment success was defined as resolution of clinical symptoms and pelvic abscess on follow-up CT at 2 weeks.

Results

The procedure was technically successful in all 4 patients. The mean size of the abscess was 93 × 61 mm. No procedural complications were encountered. Treatment was successful both in the short and medium term in all 4 patients, and the mean duration of the postprocedure hospital stay was 2 days. At a mean follow-up of 221 days (range, 65-416 days), all 4 patients were doing well, without any symptoms of pelvic-abscess recurrence.

Limitations

The small number of patients and the absence of a comparative treatment group.

Conclusions

The combined placement of a transrectal drainage catheter and a stent under EUS guidance was a technically feasible, safe, and effective technique for management of patients with pelvic abscess. This technique minimized the possibility of accidental dislodgement of the drainage catheter and facilitated earlier patient discharge from the hospital.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0016-5107(08)02195-0

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.016

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 68, Issue 6 , Pages 1215-1219, December 2008