Comparison of carcinoembryonic antigen and molecular analysis in pancreatic cyst fluid
Background
Pancreatic-cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and molecular analysis are useful diagnostic tests in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts.
Objective
To assess agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cysts.
Design
Retrospective analysis.
Setting
Academic medical center.
Methods
Patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA for evaluation of pancreatic cysts were identified. The following information was used to designate a cyst mucinous: the CEA criterion was CEA level ≥192 ng/mL and the molecular analysis criteria were DNA quantity ≥40 ng/μL and/or k-ras 2-point mutation and/or ≥2 allelic imbalance mutations. Pathologic analysis of cysts served as the criterion standard.
Results
From 2006 to 2007, 100 patients met the study criteria. The average age of the patients was 63 years, 65% were women, and 30% were symptomatic. The mean diameter of pancreatic cysts was 2.5 cm. The median CEA value was 83 ng/mL (range 1-50,000 ng/mL), the mean DNA content was 16 ng/μL (range 1-212 ng/μL), 11% had K-ras mutations, and 43% had ≥2 allelic imbalance mutations. When using prespecified criteria, there was poor agreement between CEA and molecular analysis for the classification of mucinous cysts (kappa = 0.2). Poor agreement existed between CEA and DNA quantity (Spearman correlation = 0.2; P = .1), K-ras mutation (kappa = 0.3), and ≥2 allelic imbalance mutations (kappa = 0.1). Of the 19 patients for whom a final pathologic diagnosis was available, CEA had a sensitivity of 82% compared with 77% for molecular analysis. When CEA and molecular analysis were combined, 100% sensitivity was achieved.
Limitations
Retrospective analysis and small sample size.
Conclusion
There was poor agreement between CEA levels and molecular analysis for diagnosis of mucinous cysts. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved when results of CEA levels and molecular analysis were combined.
Abbreviations: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen, EUS-FNA, EUS-guided FNA
To access this article, please choose from the options below
DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
If you want to chat with an author of this article, you may contact him at msawhney0@bidmc.harvard.edu or msawhney0@hotmail.com.
PII: S0016-5107(08)02425-5
doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.015
© 2009 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
