Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 70, Issue 3 , Pages 532-536, September 2009

Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of endoclips

Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (K.R.S.G., M.B.W.), Department of Radiology (R.A.P.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Received 7 July 2008; accepted 15 January 2009. published online 25 June 2009.

Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Background

Endoscopic clipping devices are now available for treatment of GI hemorrhage and microperforations. All commercially available endoclips are labeled as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) incompatible. No data are available about the actual magnetic field strength at which endoclips are first deflected nor the clinical relevance of the magnetic fields on endoclips used in GI endoscopy.

Objective

To determine the compatibility of different endoclips with MRI.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Experiment on excised pig tissue in an MRI scanner.

Interventions

The physical deflection and strength of attraction of endoclips: Resolution Clip, TriClip, QuickClip, and Ethicon Endo-surgery Clip were measured in different positions by using an MRI scanner at a field strength of 1.5 Tesla. Endoclips that demonstrated deflection were attached to a pig stomach and tested for detachment at a 1.5-Tesla MRI field strength.

Main Outcome Measurements

Physical deflection and detachment from pig stomach mucosa in an MRI scanner.

Results

All endoclips except the one made by Ethicon Endo-surgery demonstrated physical deflection under the tested conditions. The magnetic attraction was strongest for the Resolution Clip (0.7 gauss) compared with the TriClip (1.2 gauss) and the QuickClip (26.8 gauss). Only the Triclip demonstrated detachment from the pig gastric tissue under testing conditions.

Limitations

A pig model and a small number of clips.

Conclusions

The Ethicon Endo-surgery clip is compatible with MRI. All other clips showed deflection in a magnetic field, but only the TriClip demonstrated detachment from gastric tissue, and hence should be considered MRI incompatible.

Abbreviations: ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

 See CME section; p. 537.

 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact him at wallace.michael@mayo.edu.

PII: S0016-5107(09)00104-7

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.024

Refers to article:

  • CME Activity: Continuing Medical Education Exam: September 2009

    Raquel E. Davila, Jeffrey H. Lee, William Ross, Shou-Jiang Tang, G.S. Raju, George Triadafilopoulos
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy September 2009 (Vol. 70, Issue 3, Pages 537-537.e6)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 70, Issue 3 , Pages 532-536, September 2009