Journal Home
Search for

Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 1231-1237 (December 2009)


View previous. 35 of 62 View next.

Endoscopic injection of skeletal muscle–derived cells augments gut smooth muscle sphincter function: implications for a novel therapeutic approach

Pankaj J. Pasricha, MDCorresponding Author Information, Ijaz Ahmed, MBBS, Ron J. Jankowski, PhD, Maria-Adelaide Micci, PhD

Received 24 August 2008; accepted 1 May 2009. published online 03 August 2009.

Introduction

Sphincter function is a common problem in gastroenterology and leads to disorders such as GERD and fecal incontinence.

Objective

We hypothesized that transplantation of skeletal muscle–derived cells (MDCs) into GI sphincters may improve their function, leading to a more physiological approach to treating these disorders.

Design

We performed experiments to test the potential of MDCs to survive and differentiate within the GI smooth muscle in order to gain further knowledge on the biology of skeletal muscle transplantation in GI smooth muscle sphincters as well as to test the safety and feasibility of endoscopic injection of MDCs in a large animal model.

Setting

Animal laboratory.

Interventions

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats and adult male beagle dogs were used. Rat-derived and dog-derived MDCs were prepared in vitro and labeled with DiI. DiI-labeled, rat-derived MDCs (200,000/4 μL phosphate buffered saline solution) were injected bilaterally in the pyloric wall of rats, and survival, differentiation, and in vitro contractility were assessed 1 month after transplantation. Dog-derived MDCs (4.0 × 106 cells) were also injected into the lower esophageal sphincter of 3 beagle dogs by using a standard variceal sclerotherapy needle after baseline esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. The dogs were treated with daily cyclosporine, and 2 weeks later esophageal manometry was repeated and the esophagus was examined histologically. Differentiation of grafted cells was assessed by immunofluorescence, using specific antibodies to markers of the smooth muscle phenotype (smooth muscle actin) and of the skeletal muscle phenotype (skeletal muscle myosin).

Results

In rats, grafted MDCs were visualized based on DiI fluorescence and were found to be localized within the muscle wall and in the muscularis mucosa. In vitro organ bath studies showed a significant increase in the contractile response of the pyloric sphincter to exogenous acetylcholine. In dogs, MDC injection resulted in a significant increase in baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Further, in 1 dog with significant baseline acid reflux, MDC injection resulted in a reduction of acid reflux, with the fraction of time with pH <4 decreasing from 26.5% to 1.5%. Transplanted MDCs were seen adding bulk to the lower esophageal area and were well-integrated into the surrounding tissue. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed weak expression of skeletal muscle myosin in grafted MDCs and no expression of smooth muscle actin in either rats or dogs.

Limitations

Animal study.

Conclusion

MDCs can survive and integrate into GI smooth muscle and augment their contractile response. Thus, they may have potential for the treatment of a variety of conditions.

Stanford, California, USA

Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (P.J.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, California, Department of Internal Medicine (I.A., M.-A. M.), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, and Cook Myosite (R.J.J.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Pankaj Jay Parischa, MD, FACP, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Alway Building, Rm M211, Stanford, CA 94305-5187.

 DISCLOSURE: The following authors received research support for this study from Cook Myosite: P. J. Pasricha, I. Ahmed, R. J. Jankowski, M-A. Micci. In addition, the following author disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: R. J. Jankowski is an employee of Cook Myosite.

PII: S0016-5107(09)01916-6

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.014


View previous. 35 of 62 View next.