Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy
Background
EUS-guided FNA has the potential to provide diagnostic cytologic material from pancreatic lesions that are suspicious for malignancy.
Objective
To determine the operating characteristics of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PENs).
Design
Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.
Setting
Academic tertiary-care center.
Patients
This study involved 559 patients undergoing evaluation of pancreatic masses or diffuse pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities.
Main Outcome Measurements
Performance characteristics of EUS-FNA of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and PEN.
Results
From January 1997 to December 2005, 737 patients undergoing initial EUS-FNA evaluation for a pancreatic mass were identified. In the final analysis, 559 patients with 560 FNA-sampled lesions were included. Overall, 442 lesions were pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 40 were PEN. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas and PENs was 77% (95% CI, 72.8%-80.8%) and 68% (95% CI, 50.8%-80.9%), respectively, using strict cytologic criteria. Reclassification of atypical and suspicious cytologies as diagnostic of malignancy resulted in a sensitivity of 93%, (95% CI, 90.9%-99.7%) in adenocarcinoma and 80% (95% CI, 63.9%-90.4%) in PEN. Tumor size, tumor location, and number of needle passes did not significantly influence diagnosis, but immediate cytologic evaluation was influential.
Limitations
Retrospective analysis at a single center.
Conclusions
In a large, well-controlled study, EUS-FNA was found to be an accurate test (80%) for the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by using aspiration cytology. The accuracy of the examination is significantly improved (94%) when atypical and suspicious samples are considered positive. Finally, only 2 to 3 FNA passes may be needed to achieve a good diagnostic yield.
Abbreviations: ICE, immediate cytopathologic evaluation, PEN, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm
To access this article, please choose from the options below
DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: W. R. Brugge is a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
PII: S0016-5107(09)02117-8
doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.017
© 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
