Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 1 , Pages 91-98, January 2010

Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy

Current affiliations: Gastrointestinal Unit (B.G.T., S.C., W.R.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, Department of Gastroenterology (D.A.), University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, Biostatistics Center (J.Y.), Department of Pathology (M.B.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Received 6 February 2009; accepted 14 June 2009. published online 21 October 2009.

Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Background

EUS-guided FNA has the potential to provide diagnostic cytologic material from pancreatic lesions that are suspicious for malignancy.

Objective

To determine the operating characteristics of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PENs).

Design

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.

Setting

Academic tertiary-care center.

Patients

This study involved 559 patients undergoing evaluation of pancreatic masses or diffuse pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities.

Main Outcome Measurements

Performance characteristics of EUS-FNA of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and PEN.

Results

From January 1997 to December 2005, 737 patients undergoing initial EUS-FNA evaluation for a pancreatic mass were identified. In the final analysis, 559 patients with 560 FNA-sampled lesions were included. Overall, 442 lesions were pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 40 were PEN. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas and PENs was 77% (95% CI, 72.8%-80.8%) and 68% (95% CI, 50.8%-80.9%), respectively, using strict cytologic criteria. Reclassification of atypical and suspicious cytologies as diagnostic of malignancy resulted in a sensitivity of 93%, (95% CI, 90.9%-99.7%) in adenocarcinoma and 80% (95% CI, 63.9%-90.4%) in PEN. Tumor size, tumor location, and number of needle passes did not significantly influence diagnosis, but immediate cytologic evaluation was influential.

Limitations

Retrospective analysis at a single center.

Conclusions

In a large, well-controlled study, EUS-FNA was found to be an accurate test (80%) for the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by using aspiration cytology. The accuracy of the examination is significantly improved (94%) when atypical and suspicious samples are considered positive. Finally, only 2 to 3 FNA passes may be needed to achieve a good diagnostic yield.

Abbreviations: ICE, immediate cytopathologic evaluation, PEN, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: W. R. Brugge is a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

PII: S0016-5107(09)02117-8

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.017

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 1 , Pages 91-98, January 2010