Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 461-467.e2, March 2010

Effectiveness of asynchronous tele-endoscopy

Presented at Digestive Disease Week, May 18-21 2008, San Diego, California (Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:AB257).

Division of Gastroenterology, (P.G.R.), Health Policy, Management and Evaluation and the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, (J.A.C.), Faculty of Medicine (A.G., S.P., T.T.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network (P.G.R., J.A.C.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 16 February 2009; accepted 14 October 2009.

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Background

Asynchronous tele-endoscopy can improve access and quality of patient care. This is the first published evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of highly compressed digital video in GI endoscopy.

Objective

To determine whether asynchronous tele-endoscopy using highly compressed video can accurately document and diagnose lesions in the upper GI tract.

Design

Local endoscopists performed 50 elective upper GI endoscopies. A high-quality DV compressed video (25 megabits per second [Mbps], 720 × 480 pixels) and highly compressed MPEG-1 video (2.0 Mbps, 352 × 240 pixels) were simultaneously captured. Five endoscopists asynchronously reviewed 20 compressed digital videos (100 case reviews) for endoscopic diagnoses. In addition, demonstration technique and image quality were rated on a Likert scale. Concordance between local and asynchronous endoscopists for major and minor endoscopic findings was evaluated. An independent panel classified discrepancies as caused by image quality, endoscopic technique, or interobserver variability through comparison of the 2 forms of digital video.

Results

Although asynchronous endoscopists rated the image quality of highly compressed video as diagnostic in 85% of cases, only 18% of studies yielded the same clinical diagnoses. There was high discordance for both major (kappa = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.19-0.57) and minor findings (kappa = −0.29, 95% CI, −0.43 to −0.15). Interobserver reporting was responsible for 90% of variability in contrast to only 4.9% for poor image quality.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of low-bandwidth, low-resolution, highly compressed video is well tolerated and comparable to the current standard. Interobserver reporting variability accounted for most of the poor correlation. Improved synoptic documentation is required for effective communication among endoscopists.

Abbreviations: LCD, liquid crystal display, mbps, Megabits per second, MST, Minimal Standard Terminology, UGI, upper GI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: The study was funded through the Centre for Global e-Health Innovation (http://www.ehealthinnovation.org/) as part of an electronic health record development and evaluation initiative. All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

PII: S0016-5107(09)02590-5

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.020

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 3 , Pages 461-467.e2, March 2010