Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 4 , Pages 706-712, April 2010

Esophageal dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis: safety and predictors of clinical response and complications

  • Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    • Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Evan S. Dellon, MD, CB #7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080
  • ,
  • Wood B. Gibbs, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Tara C. Rubinas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Karen J. Fritchie, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Ryan D. Madanick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    • Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • John T. Woosley, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Nicholas J. Shaheen, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    • Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Received 20 July 2009; accepted 22 October 2009. published online 19 February 2010.

Background

Esophageal strictures resulting from eosinophilic esophagitis present management challenges, and high rates of rents and perforation have been reported.

Objective

To assess the safety of esophageal dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis and to characterize predictors of both clinical response and complications of the procedure.

Design

Retrospective study of the University of North Carolina eosinophilic esophagitis database.

Setting

Tertiary care referral center.

Patients

Cases of eosinophilic esophagitis were defined as per consensus guidelines.

Intervention

Dilation with either Savary or through-the-scope balloon techniques.

Main Outcome Measurements

Complications (deep mucosal rents, contained or free perforation, and chest pain requiring medical attention or hospitalization) and the global clinical symptom response.

Results

Of 130 eosinophilic esophagitis cases identified, 70 dilations (12 Savary, 58 balloon) were performed in 36 patients. Esophageal size improved from 12 to 16 mm (P < .001), with an overall symptom response rate of 83%. The only predictor of clinical response was final dilation diameter. There were 5 complications (7%): 2 deep mucosal rents and 3 episodes of chest pain. There were no perforations. There was one hospitalization for chest pain. All complications occurred in patients being treated with topical steroids, who underwent balloon dilation. Complications were associated with younger age (23 vs 42; P = .02) and more dilations (4 vs 1.7; P = .009).

Limitations

Single center, retrospective study.

Conclusions

Esophageal dilation can be performed in eosinophilic esophagitis with low rates of tears, chest pain, and hospitalization. No perforations were found in our database. The effectiveness of dilation was best when a larger esophageal caliber was achieved, but patients undergoing more procedures was associated with complications.

Abbreviations: EoE, eosinophilic esophagitis, eos/HPF, eosinophils per high-power field, HPF, high-power field

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE:All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. This work was funded, in part, by support from grant KL2RR025746 from the National Center for Research Resources as well as by a Junior Faculty Development Award from the American College of Gastroenterology.

 See CME section; p. 824

PII: S0016-5107(09)02701-1

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.047

Refers to article:

  • Continuing Medical Education Exam: April 2010

    Raquel E. Davila, Jeffrey H. Lee, William Ross, Shou-Jiang Tang, G.S. Raju, Glenn M. Eisen
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy April 2010 (Vol. 71, Issue 4, Pages 824-824.e5)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 71, Issue 4 , Pages 706-712, April 2010