Esophageal dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis: safety and predictors of clinical response and complications
Background
Esophageal strictures resulting from eosinophilic esophagitis present management challenges, and high rates of rents and perforation have been reported.
Objective
To assess the safety of esophageal dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis and to characterize predictors of both clinical response and complications of the procedure.
Design
Retrospective study of the University of North Carolina eosinophilic esophagitis database.
Setting
Tertiary care referral center.
Patients
Cases of eosinophilic esophagitis were defined as per consensus guidelines.
Intervention
Dilation with either Savary or through-the-scope balloon techniques.
Main Outcome Measurements
Complications (deep mucosal rents, contained or free perforation, and chest pain requiring medical attention or hospitalization) and the global clinical symptom response.
Results
Of 130 eosinophilic esophagitis cases identified, 70 dilations (12 Savary, 58 balloon) were performed in 36 patients. Esophageal size improved from 12 to 16 mm (P < .001), with an overall symptom response rate of 83%. The only predictor of clinical response was final dilation diameter. There were 5 complications (7%): 2 deep mucosal rents and 3 episodes of chest pain. There were no perforations. There was one hospitalization for chest pain. All complications occurred in patients being treated with topical steroids, who underwent balloon dilation. Complications were associated with younger age (23 vs 42; P = .02) and more dilations (4 vs 1.7; P = .009).
Limitations
Single center, retrospective study.
Conclusions
Esophageal dilation can be performed in eosinophilic esophagitis with low rates of tears, chest pain, and hospitalization. No perforations were found in our database. The effectiveness of dilation was best when a larger esophageal caliber was achieved, but patients undergoing more procedures was associated with complications.
Abbreviations: EoE, eosinophilic esophagitis, eos/HPF, eosinophils per high-power field, HPF, high-power field
To access this article, please choose from the options below
DISCLOSURE:All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. This work was funded, in part, by support from grant KL2RR025746 from the National Center for Research Resources as well as by a Junior Faculty Development Award from the American College of Gastroenterology.
See CME section; p. 824
PII: S0016-5107(09)02701-1
doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.047
© 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Continuing Medical Education Exam: April 2010
