Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 72, Issue 3 , Pages 490-496.e1, September 2010

Biopsy depth after radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Current affiliations: University of North Carolina School of Medicine (N.J.S., A.F.P.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Gastrointestinal Associates (B.F.O.), Knoxville, Tennessee, Columbia University Medical Center (C.J.L.), University Hospitals-Case Medical Center (A.C.), Cleveland, Ohio, Mayo Clinic (K.K.W.), Rochester, Minnesota, Medical University of South Carolina (R.H.H.), Charleston, South Carolina, Mayo Clinic Arizona (D.E.F.), Scottsdale, Arizona, Cleveland Clinic (J.R.G.), Cleveland, Ohio

Received 4 February 2010; accepted 5 April 2010. published online 05 July 2010.

Background

After endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE), endoscopic biopsy samples are obtained to assess response to therapy. Whether these biopsies are of adequate depth to assess efficacy is unknown.

Objective

To compare the depth of endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA with those of untreated controls and to determine the prevalence of subepithelial structures in endoscopic biopsy fragments.

Design

Secondary analysis of the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study.

Setting

Nineteen treatment centers.

Patients

Subjects with dysplastic BE, either status post RFA or ablation naïve (sham).

Main Outcome Measurements

The proportion of biopsy samples demonstrating subepithelial structures, stratified by tissue type (columnar vs squamous) in sham- and RFA-treated subjects.

Results

A total of 5648 biopsy fragments were analyzed from 113 subjects (78 RFA, 35 sham; mean 50.0 fragments per subject). Most fragments (4653, 82.4%) contained subepithelium. Squamous biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects demonstrated subepithelium at similar rates (78.4% vs 79.1%, respectively, P = not significant [NS]). Columnar biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects also included subepithelium at similar rates (99.0% vs 98.8%, respectively, P = NS). Regardless of treatment assignment, more columnar than squamous biopsy samples demonstrated subepithelium (98.8% vs 78.5%, P < .001).

Limitations

Biopsy samples were not individually mounted.

Conclusions

In both squamous and columnar tissue, endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA were as likely to demonstrate subepithelium as untreated controls. Almost 80% of all biopsy samples were adequate to evaluate for subsquamous intestinal metaplasia. The primary determinant of biopsy depth is the type of epithelium that underwent biopsy, with squamous less likely to yield subepithelium than columnar. Biopsy samples after RFA appear to be of adequate depth to assess response to therapy. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00282672.)

Abbreviations: BE, Barrett's esophagus, IM, intestinal metaplasia, LP, lamina propria, NS, not significant, RFA, radiofrequency ablation, SSIM, subsquamous intestinal metaplasia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: N.J. Shaheen: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical; research funding from and consultant for AstraZeneca; research funding from CSA Medical. B.F. Overholt: Research funding and honoraria from BÂRRX Medical. C.J. Lightdale: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. A. Chak: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. K.K. Wang: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. R.H. Hawes: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. D.E. Fleischer: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. J.R. Goldblum: Research funding from BÂRRX Medical. Statistical analysis and data management were supported by National Institutes of Health grants IH P30 DK034987 and T32 DK 07634 (AFP). The other author disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

PII: S0016-5107(10)01525-7

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.010

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 72, Issue 3 , Pages 490-496.e1, September 2010