Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 72, Issue 5 , Pages 1020-1026, November 2010

Clip closure versus endoscopic suturing versus thoracoscopic repair of an iatrogenic esophageal perforation: a randomized, comparative, long-term survival study in a porcine model (with videos)

Received 20 January 2010; accepted 21 July 2010.

Background

Esophageal full-thickness wall repair is an important but unsolved issue in endoscopy. It is unknown how well endoscopic clip closure (ECC) and endoscopic closure with suturing (ECS) perform compared with the criterion standard of thoracoscopic closure (TC).

Objective

Comparison of technical success, feasibility, long-term patency, complications, and histological quality of the different closure techniques (ECC, ECS, TC) for esophageal perforations.

Design

Comparative animal study.

Setting

Approved animal facility.

Subjects

Eighteen pigs.

Interventions

Eighteen pigs were randomized, 6 each into 3 groups (ECC, ECS, TC). After endoscopic wall incision and mediastinoscopy, closure was performed by using 1 of the 3 techniques. After 8 to 12 weeks, pre-euthanasia endoscopic, necropsy, histological, and morphometric analyses were performed.

Main Outcome Measurement

Long-term survival and histological quality of the repair.

Results

The closure of the esophageal incisions was successful in all pigs. On days 2 and 6, 1 animal died of mediastinitis, 1 in the ECS group because of reflux of gastric contents into the mediastinum before the repair and 1 in the TC group because of leakage of the sutured closure (P = 1.0). No strictures were seen on prenecropsy endoscopy. At necropsy, 1 mediastinal abscess was found in an ECS animal (P = 1.0). Minor complications included periesophageal adhesions and reactive lymph nodes in 3 of 6 (ECC group) and 5 of 6 (TC and ECS groups). Histology showed muscle layer defects up to 12 mm in width and 21 mm in length, with a trend toward smaller defect size of width and length in the ECS group of animals.

Limitations

Animal study of limited size.

Conclusions

Overall, ECS and ECC performed similarly to TC. ECS showed the smallest histological defects in the long-term repair.

Abbreviations: ECC, endoscopic clip closure, ECS, endoscopic closure with suturing, TC, thoracoscopic closure

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Fritscher-Ravens at fri.rav@btopenworld.com.

PII: S0016-5107(10)01899-7

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.029

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume 72, Issue 5 , Pages 1020-1026, November 2010