Background
Fujifilm developed blue laser imaging (BLI) via a laser light source with a narrow-band
light observation function. It has a brighter BLI bright mode for tumor detection.
Objective
To investigate whether the BLI bright mode can improve the visibility of colorectal
polyps compared with white light (WL).
Design
We studied 100 colorectal polyps (protruding, 42; flat, 58; size, 2–20 mm) and recorded
videos of the polyps by using the BLI bright mode and WL at Kyoto Prefectural University
of Medicine and Fukuoka Chikushi University Hospital. The videos were evaluated by
4 expert endoscopists and 4 nonexperts. Each endoscopist evaluated the videos in a
randomized order. Each polyp was assigned a visibility score from 4 (excellent visibility)
to 1 (poor visibility).
Setting
Japanese academic units.
Main Outcome Measurements
The visibility scores in each mode and their relationship to the clinical characteristics
were analyzed.
Results
The mean visibility scores of the BLI bright mode were significantly higher than those
of WL for both experts and nonexperts (experts, 3.10 ± 0.95 vs 2.90 ± 1.09; P = .00013; nonexperts, 3.04 ± 0.94 vs 2.78 ± 1.03; P < .0001). For all nonexperts, the visibility scores of the BLI bright mode were significantly
higher than those of WL; however, these scores were significantly higher in only 2
experts. For experts, the mean visibility scores of the BLI bright mode was significantly
higher than those of WL for flat polyps, neoplastic polyps, and polyps located on
the left side of the colon and the rectum.
Limitations
Small sample size and review of videos.
Conclusions
Our study showed that polyps were more easily visible with the BLI bright mode compared
with WL. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000013770.)
Abbreviations:
BLI (blue laser imaging), FICE (flexible spectral imaging color enhancement), IEE (image-enhanced endoscopy), NBI (narrow-band imaging), WL (white light)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Gastrointestinal EndoscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 525-532
- Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 343-352
- Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001; 11: 519-535
- Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications.World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 1688-1695
- Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 2711-2716
- A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.Gut. 2008; 57: 1406-1412
- Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy–a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 280-286
- Narrow band imaging (NBI) for adenoma detection in high risk patients: a randomized, controlled trial.Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14: e771-e778
- Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5).Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2383-2388
- Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 734-741
- Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate?–a pilot study.Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 1926-1932
- The ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of invasion depth of colorectal neoplasms.J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49: 73-80
- The ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps.Dig Endosc. 2014; 26: 250-258
Miyaki R, Yoshida S, Tanaka S, et al. A computer system to be used with laser-based endoscopy for quantitative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
- Present and future status of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and blue laser imaging technology.Dig Endosc. 2014; 26: 105-115
- The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon–November 30 to December 1, 2002.Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58: S3-S43
- Hamilton S.R. Aaltonen L.A. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. IARC Press, Lyon, France2010: 104-109
- Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 631-636
- A meta-analysis for evaluating the accuracy of endoscopy with narrow band imaging in detecting colorectal adenomas.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27: 882-887
- Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies.BMC Gastroenterol. 2011; 11: 100
- Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia.Dig Endosc. 2013; 25: 16-20
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: April 04, 2015
Accepted:
January 12,
2015
Received:
June 10,
2014
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE: Dr Itoh received support from AstraZeneca Co, Ltd, Eisai Co, Ltd; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; MSD KK; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co, Ltd; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; FUJIFILM Medical Co, Ltd; Merck Serono Co; and Bristol-Myers KK. Dr Yagi received support from AstraZeneca Co, Ltd; Eisai Co, Ltd; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; MSD KK; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co, Ltd; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; Fujifilm Medical Co, Ltd; and Merck Serono Co. Dr Naito received support from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (J132003243) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (J132003379 and J132003384). All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Yoshida at [email protected] .
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
