Background
Objective
Design
Setting
Main Outcome Measurements
Results
Limitations
Conclusions
Abbreviation:
ASGE (American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Gastrointestinal EndoscopyReferences
- A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 446-454
- Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data.Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 535-539
- Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: S283-S290
- Analyzing ERCP practice by a modified degree of difficulty scale: a multicenter database analysis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 2480-2481
- Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.Postgrad Med J. 2003; 79: 467-470
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc (in press).
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: noncardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc (in press).
- How many times have you done this procedure, doctor?.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 522-523
Available at: www.GIQuIC.com. Accessed December, 2010.
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
See CME section; p. 1015
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr. Cotton at [email protected]