Advertisement

Endoscopic simulators

      The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, by performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the “related articles” feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McCashland T.
        • Brand R.
        • Lyden E.
        • et al.
        The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 3129-3132
        • Bini E.J.
        • Firoozi B.
        • Choung R.J.
        • et al.
        Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 8-16
        • Markman H.D.
        A new system for teaching proctosigmoidoscopic morphology.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 1969; 52: 65-69
        • Heinkel V.K.
        • Kimmig J.M.
        Megenphantome zur ausbiling in der gastrokamera-magenuntersuchung.
        Z Gastroenterol. 1971; 9 ([German]): 331
        • Classen M.
        • Ruppin H.
        Practical training using a new gastrointestinal phantom.
        Endoscopy. 1974; 6: 127-131
        • Nelson D.B.
        • Bosco J.J.
        • Curtis W.D.
        • et al.
        Technology status evaluation report: endoscopy simulators.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 790-792
        • Hochberger J.
        • Neumann M.
        • Hohenberger W.
        • et al.
        Neuer Endoskopie-Trainer für die therapeutische flexible Endoskopie.
        Z Gastroenterol. 1997; 35 ([German]): 722-723
        • Hochberger J.
        • Neumann M.
        • Maiss J.
        • et al.
        Erlanger Ausbildungssimulator für die interventionelle Endoskopie(EASIE): Eine neue Perspektive für die qualitdtsorientierte praktische Ausbildung.
        Endoskopie heute. 1998; 4 ([German]): 23-25
        • Maiss J.
        • Hildebrand V.
        • Bayer J.
        • et al.
        miniEASIE – Ein neues, auf die Belange der interventionellen endoskopie reduziertes trainingsmodell.
        Endoskopie heute. 1999; 12 ([German]): 53
        • Hochberger J.
        • Matthes K.
        • Maiss J.
        • et al.
        Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 204-215
        • Sedlack R.E.
        • Baron T.H.
        • Downing S.M.
        • et al.
        Validation of a colonoscopy simulation model for skills assessment.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 64-74
        • Neumann M.
        • Mayer G.
        • Ell C.
        • et al.
        The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
        Endoscopy. 2000; 32: 906-910
        • Sedlack R.E.
        Simulation in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        in: Loyd G.E. Lake C.L. Greenberg R.B. Practical healthcare simulations. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia2004: 459-474
        • May A.
        • Nachbar L.
        • Schneider M.
        • et al.
        Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.
        Endoscopy. 2005; 37: 66-70
        • Matthes K.
        • Cohen J.
        The neo-papilla: a new modification of porcine ex-vivo simulators for ERCP training.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64 (with videos): 570-576
        • Williams C.B.
        • Baillie J.
        • Gillies D.F.
        • et al.
        Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 36: 49-54
        • Noar M.D.
        Robotics interactive endoscopy simulation of ERCP/sphincterotomy and EGD.
        Endoscopy. 1992; 24: 539-541
        • Koch A.D.
        • Haringsma J.
        • Schoon E.J.
        • et al.
        A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience.
        Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 735-738
        • Gerson L.B.
        • Van Dam J.
        Technology review: the use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60: 992-1001
        • Leung J.
        • Lee J.
        • Rojany M.
        • et al.
        Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65: 1056-1062
        • Ferlitsch A.
        • Glauninger P.
        • Gupper A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Endoscopy. 2002; 34: 698-702
        • Moorthy K.
        • Munz Y.
        • Jiwanji M.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 328-333
        • Di Guilio E.
        • Fregonese D.
        • Casetti T.
        • et al.
        Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60: 196-200
        • Hochberger J.
        • Matthes K.
        • Maiss J.
        • et al.
        Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 204-215
        • Haycock A.
        • Youd P.
        • Bassett P.
        • et al.
        Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 835-845
        • Maiss J.
        • Pratt F.
        • Wiesnet J.
        • et al.
        The complementary Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis - the French training project: a prospective trial.
        Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 18: 1217-1225
        • May A.
        • Nachbar L.
        • Schneider M.
        • et al.
        Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.
        Endoscopy. 2005; 37: 66-70
        • Bittner J.
        • Mellinger J.
        • Imam T.
        • et al.
        Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for ERCP.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 357-364
        • Sedlack R.
        • Petersen B.
        • Binmoeller K.
        • et al.
        A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 886-890
        • Neumann M.
        • Mayer G.
        • Ell C.
        • et al.
        The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
        Endoscopy. 2000; 32: 906-910
        • Kim S.
        • Spencer G.
        • Makar G.
        • et al.
        Lack of a discriminatory function for endoscopy skills on a computer-based simulator.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; : 3008-3015
        • Sedlack R.E.
        • Kolars J.C.
        Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 750-751
        • Sedlack R.E.
        • Kolars J.C.
        Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 214-218
        • Grantcharov T.P.
        • Carstensen L.
        • Schulze S.
        Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator.
        JSLS. 2005; 9: 130-133
        • Mahmood T.
        • Darzi A.
        A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator.
        Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 1583-1589
        • Eversbusch A.
        • Grantcharov T.P.
        Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1514-1518
        • Mahmood T.
        • Darzi A.
        The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1224-1230
        • Clark J.A.
        • Volchok J.A.
        • Hazey J.W.
        • et al.
        Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program.
        Curr Surg. 2005; 62: 59-63
        • Cohen J.
        • Cohen S.A.
        • Vora K.C.
        • et al.
        Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the impact of virtual reality simulator training on the acquisition of competency in colonoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64: 361-368
        • Sedlack R.E.
        • Kolars J.C.
        • Alexander J.A.
        Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2: 348-352
        • Haycock A.
        • Koch A.
        • Familiari P.
        • et al.
        Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 298-307
        • Datta V.
        • Mandalia M.
        • Mackay S.
        • et al.
        The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer.
        Surg Endosc. 2002; 16: 1459-1463
        • MacDonald J.
        • Ketchum J.
        • Williams R.G.
        • et al.
        A lay person versus a trained endoscopist: can the PreOp endoscopy simulator detect a difference?.
        Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 896-898
        • Sedlack R.E.
        • Kolars J.C.
        • Alexander J.A.
        Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2: 348-352
        • Gerson L.B.
        • Van Dam J.
        A prospective randomized trial comparing a virtual reality simulator to bedside teaching for training in sigmoidoscopy.
        Endoscopy. 2003; 35: 569-575
        • Issenberg B.S.
        • Gordon M.S.
        • Gordon D.L.
        • et al.
        Simulation and new learning technologies.
        Medical Teacher. 2001; 23: 16-23