Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 77, ISSUE 1, P90-95, January 2013

Download started.


Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study

Published:August 06, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.004


      Endoscopic resection (ER) for large colonic lesions is a safe and effective outpatient treatment. Postprocedural pain creates concern for perforation and often results in postprocedure admission (PPA). Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation has been shown to reduce pain scores after routine colonoscopy, but an influence on more critical outcomes such as PPA has not been shown.


      To assess the outcomes of patients undergoing ER for large colonic lesions, comparing those having air versus those having CO2 insufflation.


      Prospective, observational, cohort study.


      Academic, high-volume, tertiary-care referral center.


      Consecutive patients referred for ER of sessile colorectal polyps ≥20 mm.


      ER with air or CO2.

      Main Outcome Measurements

      Rates of PPA, technical outcomes, complication rates.


      ER was performed on 575 lesions ≥20 mm, 228 with CO2 insufflation. Mean lesion size was 36.5 mm. Lesion and patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The use of CO2 was associated with a 62% decrease in the PPA rate from 8.9% to 3.4% (P = .01). This was mainly because of an 82% decrease in PPA for pain from 5.7% to 1.0% (P = .006). There were no significant difference in the rates of complications. Multiple logistical regression was performed. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of PPA (OR 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.95; P = .04) and PPA for pain (OR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78; P = .02) in the CO2 group remained significant.


      Single center, nonrandomized study.


      CO2 insufflation significantly reduces PPA after ER of large colonic lesions, primarily because of reduced PPA for pain. CO2 insufflation should be routinely used during ER of large colonic lesions.


      AMN (advanced mucosal neoplasia), CO2 (carbon dioxide), ER (endoscopic resection), PPA (postprocedure admission), SG (succinylated gelatin)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Zauber A.G.
        • Winawer S.J.
        • O'Brien M.J.
        • et al.
        Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 687-696
        • Bourke M.
        Endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: a practical guide.
        Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 13: 35-49
        • Moss A.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Williams S.J.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia.
        Gastroenterology. 2011; 140: 1909-1918
        • Soetikno R.M.
        • Kaltenbach T.
        • Rouse R.V.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 1027-1035
        • Saito Y.
        • Matsuda T.
        • Fujii T.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010; 20: 515-524
        • Swan M.P.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Alexander S.
        • et al.
        Large refractory colonic polyps: Is it time to change our practice?.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 1128-1136
        • Tanaka S.
        • Haruma K.
        • Oka S.
        • et al.
        Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54: 62-66
        • Ferrara F.
        • Luigiano C.
        • Ghersi S.
        • et al.
        Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps.
        Digestion. 2010; 82: 213-220
        • Bretthauer M.
        • Thiis-Evensen E.
        • Huppertz-Hauss G.
        • et al.
        NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy.
        Gut. 2002; 50: 604-607
        • Sumanac K.
        • Zealley I.
        • Fox B.M.
        • et al.
        Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: 190-194
        • Stevenson G.W.
        • Wilson J.A.
        • Wilkinson J.
        • et al.
        Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38: 564-567
        • Dellon E.S.
        • Hawk J.S.
        • Grimm I.S.
        • et al.
        The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 843-849
        • Moss A.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Metz A.J.
        A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2375-2382
        • Moss A.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Kwan V.
        • et al.
        Succinylated gelatin substantially increases en bloc resection size in colonic EMR: a randomized, blinded trial in a porcine model.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 589-595
        • Deyhle P.L.F.
        • Jenny S.
        • Fumagalli I.
        A method for endoscopic electroresection of sessile colonic polyps.
        Endoscopy. 1973; 5: 38-40
        • Repici A.
        • Hassan C.
        • De Paula Pessoa D.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review.
        Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 137-150
        • Puli S.R.
        • Kakugawa Y.
        • Gotoda T.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 4273-4277
        • Doniec J.M.
        • Mathias S.L.
        • Bodo S.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery?.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 340-348
        • Holt B.
        • Bassan M.
        • Trivedi S.
        • et al.
        The endoscopic mucosal resection defect—a prospective interrogation of 188 consecutive post resection defects for colonic lesions 20 mm or greater.
        Endoscopy. 2011; 43: A95
        • Swan M.P.
        • Bourke M.J.
        • Moss A.
        • et al.
        The target sign: an endoscopic marker for the resection of the muscularis propria and potential perforation during colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 79-85
        • Yasumasa K.
        • Nakajima K.
        • Endo S.
        • et al.
        Carbon dioxide insufflation attenuates parietal blood flow obstruction in distended colon: potential advantages of carbon dioxide insufflated colonoscopy.
        Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 587-594
        • Peiris M.
        • Bulmer D.C.
        • Baker M.D.
        • et al.
        Human visceral afferent recordings: preliminary report.
        Gut. 2011; 60: 204-208
        • Leffler D.A.
        • Kheraj R.
        • Garud S.
        • et al.
        The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy.
        Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1752-1757