Original article Experimental endoscopy| Volume 77, ISSUE 1, P102-107, January 2013

Download started.


Comparative study of NOTES alone versus NOTES guided by a new image registration system for navigation in the mediastinum: a study in a porcine model


      Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) mediastinoscopy (MED) through the esophagus has proved to be feasible in the animal model. However, injury of the adjacent pleura and pneumothorax has been reported as a frequent adverse event when using a blind access.


      To assess the utility and safety of a CT-based image registration system (IRS) for navigation in the mediastinum.


      Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 30 Yorkshire pigs. Thirty-minute MEDs were performed: 15 MEDs were performed with IRS guidance (MED-IRS), and 15 MEDs were performed with a blind access.


      Animal research laboratory.


      In both groups, the mediastinum was accessed through a 10-cm submucosal tunnel in the esophageal wall. Timed exploration was performed with identification of 8 mediastinal structures.

      Main Outcome Measurements

      Technical feasibility, adverse events, and the number of mediastinal structures identified.


      Thirty animals weighing 31.5 ± 3.5 kg were included in this study. MED was not possible in 2 animals in the “MED with blind access” group but was possible in all MEDs performed with IRS. The mean number of identified organs was slightly higher in “with IRS-MED” (6.13 ± 1.3) than with MED with blind access (4.7 ± 2.3; P = .066). Moreover, the right atrium and vena cava were identified in more cases with IRS-MED than in MED with blind access (13 vs 3 and 15 vs 11, P = .000 and P = .03, respectively). There were 3 (23%) adverse events with IRS-MED and 4 (27%) with “MED with blind access” (P = not significant), with pneumothorax being the most frequent (2 and 3, respectively).


      Nonsurvival animal study.


      This study demonstrates that the IRS system appears feasible in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery MED and suggests that IRS guidance might be useful for selected procedures.


      3D (3-dimensional), IRS (image registration system), MED (mediastinoscopy), NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Turner B.G.
        • Gee D.W.
        • Cizginer S.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic transesophageal mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection by using mediastinal and thoracic approaches (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 831-835
        • Fritscher-Ravens A.
        • Patel K.
        • Ghanbari A.
        • et al.
        Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the mediastinum: long-term survival animal experiments in transesophageal access, including minor surgical procedures.
        Endoscopy. 2007; 39: 870-875
        • Leschber G.
        • Sperling D.
        • Klemm W.
        • et al.
        Does video-mediastinoscopy improve the results of conventional mediastinoscopy?.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 33: 289-293
        • Yan T.D.
        • Black D.
        • Bannon P.G.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 16: 2152-2165
        • Krasna M.J.
        • Deshmukh S.
        • McLaughlin J.S.
        Complications of thoracoscopy.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61: 1066-1069
        • Fritscher-Ravens A.
        • Cuming T.
        • Olagbaiye F.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic transesophageal vs. thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal lymph nodes: a prospective randomized trial in a long term animal survival model.
        Endoscopy. 2011; 43: 1090-1096
        • Woodward T.
        • McCluskey D.
        • Wallace M.B.
        • et al.
        Pilot study of transesophageal endoscopic surgery: NOTES esophagomyotomy, vagotomy, lymphadenectomy.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008; 18: 743-745
        • Fritscher-Ravens A.
        • Cuming T.
        • Eisenberger C.F.
        • et al.
        Randomized comparative long-term survival study of endoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal wall repair after NOTES mediastinoscopy in healthy and compromised animals.
        Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 468-474
        • von Delius S.
        • Wilhelm D.
        • Feussner H.
        • et al.
        Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: cardiopulmonary safety of transesophageal mediastinoscopy.
        Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 405-412
        • Gee D.W.
        • Willingham F.F.
        • Lauwers G.Y.
        • et al.
        Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy: a survival series in swine.
        Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 2117-2122
        • Fernández-Esparrach G.
        • San José Estépar R.
        • Guarner-Argente C.
        • et al.
        The role of a computed tomography-based image registered navigation system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a comparative study in a porcine model.
        Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 1096-1103
        • San José Estépar R.
        • Stylopoulos N.
        • Ellis R.E.
        • et al.
        Towards scarless surgery: an endoscopic-ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures.
        Comput Aided Surg. 2007; 12: 311-324
        • Besl P.J.
        • McKay H.D.
        A method for registration of 3-D shapes.
        IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 1992; 12: 239-256
        • Yoshizumi F.
        • Yasuda K.
        • Kawaguchi K.
        • et al.
        Submucosal tunneling using endoscopic submucosal dissection for peritoneal access and closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study.
        Endoscopy. 2009; 41: 707-711
        • Fritscher-Ravens A.
        • Cuming T.
        • Jacobsen B.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and safety of endoscopic full-thickness esophageal wall resection and defect closure: a prospective long-term survival animal study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 1314-1320
        • Fritscher-Ravens A.
        • Ghanbari A.
        • Cuming T.
        • et al.
        Comparative study of NOTES alone vs. EUS-guided NOTES procedures.
        Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 925-930
        • Abi-Jaoudeh N.
        • Gossop N.
        • Dake M.
        • et al.
        Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent graft deployment: a pilot study in swine.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 21: 888-895
        • Muller S.A.
        • Maier-Hein L.
        • Tekbas A.
        • et al.
        Navigated liver biopsy using a novel soft tissue navigation system versus CT-guided liver biopsy in a porcine model: a prospective randomized trial.
        Acad Radiol. 2010; 17: 1282-1287
        • Billé A.
        • Pelosi E.
        • Skanjeti A.
        • et al.
        Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009; 36: 440-445