Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 77, ISSUE 4, P617-623, April 2013

Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time

Published:January 14, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.018


      Insufficient detection of proximal serrated polyps (PSP) might explain the occurrence of a proportion of interval carcinomas in colonoscopy surveillance programs.


      To compare PSP detection among endoscopists and to identify patient-related and endoscopist-related factors associated with PSP detection.


      Prospective study in unselected patients.


      Colonoscopy screening program for colorectal cancer at two academic medical centers.


      Asymptomatic consecutive screening participants (aged 50-75 years).


      Colonoscopies were performed by 5 experienced endoscopists. All detected polyps were removed. Multiple colonoscopy quality indicators were prospectively recorded.

      Main Outcome Measurements

      We compared PSP detection among endoscopists by calculating odds ratios (OR) with logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression also was used to identify patient features and colonoscopy factors associated with PSP detection.


      A total of 1354 patients underwent a complete screening colonoscopy: 1635 polyps were detected, of which 707 (43%) were adenomas and 685 (42%) were serrated polyps, including 215 PSPs. In 167 patients (12%) 1 or more PSPs were detected. The PSP detection rate differed significantly among endoscopists, ranging from 6% to 22% (P < .001). Longer withdrawal time (OR 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.16) was significantly associated with better PSP detection, whereas patient age, sex, and quality of bowel preparation were not.


      Limited number of highly experienced endoscopists.


      The PSP detection rate differs among endoscopists. Longer withdrawal times are associated with better PSP detection, but patient features are not. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR1888.)


      PSP (proximal serrated polyp)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Rex D.K.
        • Johnson D.A.
        • Anderson J.C.
        • et al.
        American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 739-750
        • Lakoff J.
        • Paszat L.F.
        • Saskin R.
        • et al.
        Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 1117-1121
        • Baxter N.N.
        • Goldwasser M.A.
        • Paszat L.F.
        • et al.
        Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150: 1-8
        • Kambara T.
        • Simms L.A.
        • Whitehall V.L.
        • et al.
        BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum.
        Gut. 2004; 53: 1137-1144
        • Minoo P.
        • Baker K.
        • Goswami R.
        • et al.
        Extensive DNA methylation in normal colorectal mucosa in hyperplastic polyposis.
        Gut. 2006; 55: 1467-1474
        • Spring K.J.
        • Zhao Z.Z.
        • Karamatic R.
        • et al.
        High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy.
        Gastroenterology. 2006; 131: 1400-1407
        • Jass J.R.
        • Baker K.
        • Zlobec I.
        • et al.
        Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer.
        Histopathology. 2006; 49: 121-131
        • Leggett B.
        • Whitehall V.
        Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.
        Gastroenterology. 2010; 138: 2088-2100
        • Hiraoka S.
        • Kato J.
        • Fujiki S.
        • et al.
        The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer.
        Gastroenterology. 2010; 139 (1510): 1503-1510
        • Schreiner M.A.
        • Weiss D.G.
        • Lieberman D.A.
        Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia.
        Gastroenterology. 2010; 139: 1497-1502
        • Kahi C.J.
        • Hewett D.G.
        • Norton D.L.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9: 42-46
        • de Wijkerslooth T.R.
        • de Haan M.C.
        • Stoop E.M.
        • et al.
        Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.
        BMC Gastroenterol. 2010; 10: 47
        • Stoop E.M.
        • de Haan M.C.
        • de Wijkerslooth T.R.
        • et al.
        Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: 55-64
        • Rex D.K.
        • Petrini J.L.
        • Baron T.H.
        • et al.
        Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63: S16-S28
        • Rostom A.
        • Jolicoeur E.
        Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59: 482-486
        • Schlemper R.J.
        • Riddell R.H.
        • Kato Y.
        • et al.
        The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.
        Gut. 2000; 47: 251-255
        • Ferlitsch M.
        • Reinhart K.
        • Pramhas S.
        • et al.
        Sex-specific prevalence of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancer in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy.
        JAMA. 2011; 306: 1352-1358
        • Froehlich F.
        • Wietlisbach V.
        • Gonvers J.J.
        • et al.
        Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 378-384
        • Kim J.H.
        • Kim Y.S.
        • Cheon J.H.
        • et al.
        Influence of the insertion time and number of polyps on miss rate in colonoscopy.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46: 634-639
        • Barclay R.L.
        • Vicari J.J.
        • Doughty A.S.
        • et al.
        Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2533-2541
        • Pellise M.
        • Fernandez-Esparrach G.
        • Cardenas A.
        • et al.
        Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
        Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 1062-1068
        • Rastogi A.
        • Early D.S.
        • Gupta N.
        • et al.
        Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 593-602
        • Subramanian V.
        • Mannath J.
        • Hawkey C.J.
        • et al.
        High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2011; 43: 499-505
        • Hewett D.G.
        • Rex D.K.
        Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 775-781
        • Sanaka M.R.
        • Deepinder F.
        • Thota P.N.
        • et al.
        Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 1659-1664
        • Radaelli F.
        • Meucci G.
        • Sgroi G.
        • et al.
        Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 1122-1130
        • Lee J.M.
        • Cheon J.H.
        • Park J.J.
        • et al.
        Effects of hyosine N-butyl bromide on the detection of polyps during colonoscopy.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2010; 57: 90-94
        • British Society of Gastroenterology
        BSG Guidelines on Safety and Sedation during Endoscopic Procedures.
        • van Putten P.G.
        • Hol L.
        • Van Dekken H.
        • et al.
        Inter-observer variation in the histological diagnosis of polyps in colorectal cancer screening.
        Histopathology. 2011; 58: 974-981
        • Kaminski M.F.
        • Regula J.
        • Kraszewska E.
        • et al.
        Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1795-1803
        • Rex D.K.
        Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 33-36
        • Boparai K.S.
        • Mathus-Vliegen E.M.
        • Koornstra J.J.
        • et al.
        Increased colorectal cancer risk during follow-up in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a multicentre cohort study.
        Gut. 2010; 59: 1094-1100
        • Terdiman J.P.
        • McQuaid K.R.
        Surveillance guidelines should be updated to recognize the importance of serrated polyps.
        Gastroenterology. 2010; 139: 1444-1447