In the article, “Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor close to the dentate line,” in the August issue of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:444-50), there was a typographical error in Table 2. The complete corrected table appears below.
Endoscopic follow-up time = 24.4 ± 17.2 (range, 3-64) months.
TABLE 2Clinical outcomes and complications among the 14 study patients
| Duration of ESD procedure (minutes) | 99.3 ± 55.9 (30-240) |
| En bloc resection rate | 85.7% (12/14) |
| Complications | |
| Perforation | 0 (0%) |
| Postoperative bleeding | 4 (28.6%) |
| Others | |
| Anal pain | 1 (7.1%) |
| Proctostenosis | 1 (7.1%) |
| Local recurrence | 0 (0%) |
Number (%) of patients is shown unless otherwise indicated.
ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor close to the dentate lineGastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 76Issue 2
