Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 84, ISSUE 3, P424-433.e2, September 2016

EUS Needle Identification Comparison and Evaluation study (with videos)

Published:February 09, 2016DOI:

      Background and Aims

      EUS-guided FNA or biopsy sampling is widely practiced. Optimal sonographic visualization of the needle is critical for image-guided interventions. Of the several commercially available needles, bench-top testing and direct comparison of these needles have not been done to reveal their inherent echogenicity. The aims are to provide bench-top data that can be used to guide clinical applications and to promote future device research and development.


      Descriptive bench-top testing and comparison of 8 commonly used EUS-FNA needles (all size 22 gauge): SonoTip Pro Control (Medi-Globe); Expect Slimline (Boston Scientific); EchoTip, EchoTip Ultra, EchoTip ProCore High Definition (Cook Medical); ClearView (Conmed); EZ Shot 2 (Olympus); and BNX (Beacon Endoscopic), and 2 new prototype needles, SonoCoat (Medi-Globe), coated by echogenic polymers made by Encapson. Blinded evaluation of standardized and unedited videos by 43 EUS endoscopists and 17 radiologists specialized in GI US examination who were unfamiliar with EUS needle devices.


      There was no significant difference in the ratings and rankings of these needles between endosonographers and radiologists. Overall, 1 prototype needle was rated as the best, ranking 10% to 40% higher than all other needles (P < .01). Among the commercially available needles, the EchoTip Ultra needle and the ClearView needle were top choices. The EZ Shot 2 needle was ranked statistically lower than other needles (30%-75% worse, P < .001).


      All FNA needles have their inherent and different echogenicities, and these differences are similarly recognized by EUS endoscopists and radiologists. Needles with polymeric coating from the entire shaft to the needle tip may offer better echogenicity.


      NICE (Needle Identification Comparison and Evaluation), NICE-E (NICE endosonographers), NICE-R (NICE radiologists), SED (shaft echo-definition), TED (tip echo-definition)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Vilmann P.
        • Jacobsen G.K.
        • Henriksen F.W.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38: 172-173
        • Vilmann P.
        • Hancke S.
        • Henriksen F.W.
        • et al.
        Endosonographically-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
        Endoscopy. 1993; 25: 523-527
        • Vilmann P.
        • Hancke S.
        A new biopsy handle instrument for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 43: 238-242
        • Adler D.G.
        • Conway J.D.
        • Coffie J.M.
        • et al.
        • ASGE Technology Committee
        EUS accessories.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66: 1076-1081
        • Wani S.
        • Muthusamy V.R.
        • Komanduri S.
        EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 939-959
        • Kaul V.
        • Adler D.G.
        • Conway J.D.
        • et al.
        • ASGE Technology Committee
        Interventional EUS.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 1-4
        • Hopkins R.E.
        • Bradley M.
        In-vitro visualization of biopsy needles with ultrasound: a comparative study of standard and echogenic needles using an ultrasound phantom.
        Clin Radiol. 2001; 56: 499-502
        • Sviggum H.P.
        • Ahn K.
        • Dilger J.A.
        • et al.
        Needle echogenicity in sonographically guided regional anesthesia: blinded comparison of 4 enhanced needles and validation of visual criteria for evaluation.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32: 143-148
        • Schafhalter-Zoppoth I.
        • McCulloch C.E.
        • Gray A.T.
        Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004; 29: 480-488
        • Culp W.C.
        • McCowan T.C.
        • Goertzen T.C.
        • et al.
        Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled, and polymeric-coated needles.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000; 11: 351-358
        • Nichols K.
        • Wright L.B.
        • Spencer T.
        • et al.
        Changes in ultrasonographic echogenicity and visibility of needles with changes in angles of insonation.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14: 1553-1557
        • Wiesmann T.
        • Bornträger A.
        • Zoremba M.
        • et al.
        Compound imaging technology and echogenic needle design: effects on needle visibility and tissue imaging.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 38: 452-455
        • Hocking G.
        • Hebard S.
        • Mitchell C.H.
        A review of the benefits and pitfalls of phantoms in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011; 36: 162-170
        • Culjat M.O.
        • Goldenberg D.
        • Tewari P.
        • et al.
        A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010; 36: 861-873
        • Mesurolle B.
        • Helou T.
        • El-Khoury M.
        • et al.
        Tissue harmonic imaging, frequency compound imaging, and conventional imaging: use and benefit in breast sonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1041-1051
        • Mesurolle B.
        • Bining H.J.S.
        • El Khoury M.
        • et al.
        Contribution of tissue harmonic imaging and frequency compound imaging in interventional breast sonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25: 845-855
        • Reusz G.
        • Sarkany P.
        • Gal J.
        • et al.
        Needle-related ultrasound artifacts and their importance in anaesthetic practice.
        Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112: 794-802