Advertisement
Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 84, ISSUE 6, P924-929, December 2016

A retrospective study on the safety, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic effects of endoscopic unroofing for small gastric subepithelial tumors

  • Werner Dolak
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Werner Dolak, MD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Andrea Beer
    Affiliations
    Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ivan Kristo
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Barbara Tribl
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Reza Asari
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Maximilian Schöniger-Hekele
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Fritz Wrba
    Affiliations
    Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sebastian F. Schoppmann
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michael Trauner
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
  • Andreas Püspök
    Affiliations
    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
    Search for articles by this author
Published:April 21, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.019

      Background and Aims

      Accurate diagnosis of small gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) is essential to assess their malignant potential. Endoscopic unroofing has been reported to yield sufficient tissue samples for histologic evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, diagnostic yield, and potential therapeutic effects of this technique over time.

      Methods

      This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data identified patients who underwent endoscopic unroofing at the Medical University of Vienna from January 2003 to December 2012. Demographic data, indications for endoscopic unroofing, intraprocedural adverse events, hospital stay, histologic results, and follow-up procedures were reviewed.

      Results

      A total of 14 patients (7 men; 7 women; median age, 70 years; range, 51-95 years) underwent endoscopic unroofing of 14 gastric SETs with a mean diameter of 26 ± 13 mm at EUS. In 9 of 14 cases, endoscopic unroofing was done exclusively for diagnostic purposes; in the remaining cases, it was performed with therapeutic intent because of bleeding from the gastric SETs. Unroofing was technically successful in 13 of 14 cases and revealed 8 cases of GI stromal tumor (GIST) and 1 case each of leiomyoma, fibroid polyp, glomus tumor, pancreatic rest, and nondiagnostic material at histology. Intraprocedural bleeding was the only adverse event (4 cases) and could be managed endoscopically. A follow-up EUS was available (median, 8 months) for 10 of the 14 patients. Notably, most patients showed complete regression of their gastric SETs after unroofing (on white light and EUS), including the glomus tumor, the leiomyoma, and 6 of the 8 cases of GIST.

      Conclusions

      Endoscopic unroofing was safe and had a very favorable diagnostic yield in this study. Unexpectedly, it led to complete regression in most gastric SETs. Although it is not an oncologically curative treatment, endoscopic unroofing can be a valuable option to treat local adverse events in patients unfit for surgical therapy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02587923.)

      Abbreviations:

      APC (argon plasma coagulation), ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), EUS-FNA (EUS-guided FNA), FTER (full-thickness endoscopic resection), GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor), SET (subepithelial tumor), STER (submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hwang J.H.
        • Kimmey M.B.
        The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass.
        Gastroenterology. 2004; 126: 301-307
        • Seo S.W.
        • Hong S.J.
        • Han J.P.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of a scoring system for the differential diagnosis of common gastric subepithelial tumors based on endoscopic ultrasonography.
        J Dig Dis. 2013; 14: 647-653
        • ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group
        Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
        Ann Oncol. 2014; 25: iii21-iii26
        • Iorio N.
        • Sawaya R.A.
        • Friedenberg F.K.
        The biology, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
        Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 39: 1376-1386
        • Buscaglia J.M.
        • Nagula S.
        • Jayaraman V.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic yield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower GI tract.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 1147-1152
        • Watson R.R.
        • Binmoeller K.F.
        • Hamerski C.M.
        • et al.
        Yield and performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosing upper GI tract stromal tumors.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56: 1757-1762
        • Lee I.L.
        • Lin P.Y.
        • Tung S.Y.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.
        Endoscopy. 2006; 38: 1024-1028
        • Zhou P.H.
        • Yao L.Q.
        • Qin X.Y.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria.
        Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 2926-2931
        • Wilhelm D.
        • von Delius S.
        • Burian M.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous use of laparoscopy and endoscopy for minimally invasive resection of gastric subepithelial masses—analysis of 93 interventions.
        World J Surg. 2008; 32: 1021-1028
        • Sun S.
        • Ge N.
        • Wang C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic band ligation of small gastric stromal tumors and follow-up by endoscopic ultrasonography.
        Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 574-578
        • Lee S.H.
        • Park J.H.
        • Park D.H.
        • et al.
        Endoloop ligation of large pedunculated submucosal tumors (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 556-560
        • Mimura T.
        • Kuramoto S.
        • Hashimoto M.
        • et al.
        Unroofing for lymphangioma of the large intestine: a new approach to endoscopic treatment.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 46: 259-263
        • Lee C.K.
        • Chung I.K.
        • Lee S.H.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic partial resection with the unroofing technique for reliable tissue diagnosis of upper GI subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria on EUS (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 188-194
        • Miettinen M.
        • Lasota J.
        Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites.
        Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006; 23: 70-83
        • Binmoeller K.F.
        • Shah J.N.
        • Bhat Y.M.
        • et al.
        Suck-ligate-unroof-biopsy by using a detachable 20-mm loop for the diagnosis and therapy of small subepithelial tumors (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79: 750-755
        • DeMatteo R.P.
        • Lewis J.J.
        • Leung D.
        • et al.
        Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.
        Ann Surg. 2000; 231: 51-58