Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 84, ISSUE 6, P933-940, December 2016

Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions

      Background and Aims

      Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at a late stage. Little is known about the incidental finding of early-stage PDAC. The aim of the current study was to determine the etiology of small solid pancreatic lesions (≤15 mm) to optimize clinical management.

      Methods

      Inclusion criterion for the retrospective study analysis was the incidental finding of primarily undetermined small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm in 394 asymptomatic patients. Final diagnoses were based on histology or cytology obtained by imaging-guided biopsy (and at least 12-month follow-up) and/or surgery. Contrast-enhanced US or contrast-enhanced EUS was performed in 219 patients.

      Results

      The final diagnoses of 394 patients were as follows: 146 PDACs, 156 neuroendocrine tumors, 28 metastases into the pancreas from other primary sites, and 64 various other etiologies. Contrast-enhanced US allowed differential diagnosis of PDAC and non-PDAC in 189 of 219 patients (86%).

      Conclusions

      Approximately 40% of patients with small solid pancreatic lesions had very early stage PDAC. Approximately 60% of small solid pancreatic lesions ≤15 mm are not PDAC and, therefore, do not require radical surgery. Without preoperative diagnosis, an unacceptably large proportion of patients would be exposed to radical surgery with significant morbidity and mortality.

      Abbreviations:

      EUS-FNA (EUS-guided FNA, fine needle aspiration), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PDAC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), PAMUS (pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ferlay J.
        • Soerjomataram I.
        • Dikshit R.
        • et al.
        Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
        Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E359-E386
        • Yu J.
        • Blackford A.L.
        • Dal Molin M.
        • et al.
        Time to progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from low-to-high tumour stages.
        Gut. 2015; 64: 1783-1789
        • D'Onofrio M.
        • Zamboni G.A.
        • Malago R.
        • et al.
        Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Is the enhancement pattern at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography a pre-operative prognostic factor?.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35: 1929-1937
      1. Network NCC. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Onkology (NCCN Guidelines): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp; 2015. Accessed November 10, 2015.

        • Liles J.S.
        • Katz M.H.
        Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
        Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014; 14: 919-929
        • Matsuoka L.
        • Selby R.
        • Genyk Y.
        The surgical management of pancreatic cancer.
        Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2012; 41: 211-221
        • Aso A.
        • Ihara E.
        • Osoegawa T.
        • et al.
        Key endoscopic ultrasound features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma smaller than 20 mm.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49: 332-338
        • Wang W.
        • Shpaner A.
        • Krishna S.G.
        • et al.
        Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78: 73-80
        • Tanaka M.
        • Fernandez-Del Castillo C.
        • Adsay V.
        • et al.
        International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas.
        Pancreatology. 2012; 12: 183-197
        • Piscaglia F.
        • Nolsoe C.
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • et al.
        The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications.
        Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: 33-59
        • Gleason M.X.
        • Mdzinarishvili T.
        • Are C.
        • et al.
        Prognostic estimator of survival for patients with localized and extended pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
        Cancer Inform. 2013; 12: 103-114
        • Scialpi M.
        • Cagini L.
        • Pierotti L.
        • et al.
        Detection of small (≤ 2 cm) pancreatic adenocarcinoma and surrounding parenchyma: correlations between enhancement patterns at triphasic MDCT and histologic features.
        BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14: 16
        • Chari S.T.
        Detecting early pancreatic cancer: problems and prospects.
        Semin Oncol. 2007; 34: 284-294
        • Ishikawa O.
        • Ohigashi H.
        • Imaoka S.
        • et al.
        Minute carcinoma of the pancreas measuring 1 cm or less in diameter—collective review of Japanese case reports.
        Hepato-gastroenterology. 1999; 46: 8-15
        • Yasuda I.
        • Iwashita T.
        • Doi S.
        • et al.
        Role of EUS in the early detection of small pancreatic cancer.
        Dig Endosc. 2011; 23: 22-25
        • van Heerde M.J.
        • Biermann K.
        • Zondervan P.E.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of autoimmune pancreatitis and other benign disorders in pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy of the pancreatic head.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57: 2458-2465
        • Seufferlein T.
        • Bachet J.B.
        • Van Cutsem E.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
        Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: vii33-vii40
        • Seufferlein T.
        • Porzner M.
        • Becker T.
        • et al.
        S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer.
        Z Gastroenterol. 2013; 51: 1395-1440
        • Tempero M.A.
        • Arnoletti J.P.
        • Behrman S.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010; 8: 972-1017
        • Asbun H.J.
        • Conlon K.
        • Fernandez-Cruz L.
        • et al.
        When to perform a pancreatoduodenectomy in the absence of positive histology? A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.
        Surgery. 2014; 155: 887-892
        • Saif M.W.
        Pancreatic neoplasm in 2011: an update.
        JOP. 2011; 12: 316-321
        • Krishna N.B.
        • Tummala P.
        • Mehan C.D.
        • et al.
        Small and potentially resectable focal pancreatic lesions noted on CT/MRI scans in nonjaundiced patients: likelihood of neoplasia and utility of EUS.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 793-800
        • Haba S.
        • Yamao K.
        • Bhatia V.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
        J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48: 973-981
        • Falconi M.
        • Bartsch D.K.
        • Eriksson B.
        • et al.
        ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors.
        Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 95: 120-134
      2. Network NCC. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Neurodendocrine Tumors. In: Network NCC: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed November 10, 2015.

        • D'Onofrio M.
        • Biagioli E.
        • Gerardi C.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) for the differentiation of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ultraschall Med. 2014; 35: 515-521
        • Lee E.S.
        • Lee J.M.
        Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 7864-7877
        • Eloubeidi M.A.
        • Decker G.A.
        • Chandrasekhara V.
        • et al.
        • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee
        The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 17-28
        • D'Onofrio M.
        • Crosara S.
        • Signorini M.
        • et al.
        Comparison between CT and CEUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
        Ultraschall Med. 2013; 34: 377-381
        • Khashab M.A.
        • Yong E.
        • Lennon A.M.
        • et al.
        EUS is still superior to multidetector computerized tomography for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 691-696
        • D'Onofrio M.
        • Barbi E.
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS).
        Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: 630-638
        • Muller M.F.
        • Meyenberger C.
        • Bertschinger P.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.
        Radiology. 1994; 190: 745-751
        • Shrikhande S.V.
        • Barreto S.G.
        • Goel M.
        • et al.
        Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.
        HPB (Oxford). 2012; 14: 658-668
        • DeWitt J.
        • Devereaux B.
        • Chriswell M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.
        Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 753-763
        • DeWitt J.
        • Devereaux B.M.
        • Lehman G.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4: 717-725
        • Agarwal B.
        • Abu-Hamda E.
        • Molke K.L.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 844-850
        • Hewitt M.J.
        • McPhail M.J.
        • Possamai L.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 319-331
        • Chen G.
        • Liu S.
        • Zhao Y.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
        Pancreatology. 2013; 13: 298-304
        • Chen J.
        • Yang R.
        • Lu Y.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138: 1433-1441
        • Puli S.R.
        • Bechtold M.L.
        • Buxbaum J.L.
        • et al.
        How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
        Pancreas. 2013; 42: 20-26
        • Katanuma A.
        • Maguchi H.
        • Yane K.
        • et al.
        Factors predictive of adverse events associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58: 2093-2099
        • Wang K.X.
        • Ben Q.W.
        • Jin Z.D.
        • et al.
        Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 283-290
        • Jenssen C.
        • Alvarez-Sanchez M.V.
        • Napoleon B.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18: 4659-4676
        • Jenssen C.
        • Hocke M.
        • Fusaroli P.
        • et al.
        EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), part IV—EUS-guided interventions: general aspects and EUS-guided sampling (long version).
        Ultraschall Med. 2016; 37: E33-E76
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • Ignee A.
        • Frey H.
        Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique.
        Z Gastroenterol. 2005; 43: 1219-1223
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • Braden B.
        • Hocke M.
        • et al.
        Improved characterisation of solitary solid pancreatic tumours using contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008; 134: 635-643
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • Ignee A.
        • Braden B.
        • et al.
        Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 590-597
        • Hocke M.
        • Cui X.W.
        • Domagk D.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic cystic lesions: the value of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound to influence the clinical pathway.
        Endosc Ultrasound. 2014; 3: 123-130
        • Dietrich C.F.
        • Hocke M.
        • Gallotti A.
        • et al.
        Solid pancreatic tumors.
        in: D'Onofrio M. Ultrasonography of the pancreas. Springer-Verlag Italia, 2012: 95-112
        • Mork H.
        • Ignee A.
        • Schuessler G.
        • et al.
        Analysis of neuroendocrine tumour metastases in the liver using contrast enhanced ultrasonography.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42: 652-662