Background and Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Abbreviations:
EDR (endoscopically determined recurrence), HDR (histologically determined recurrence), LSL (laterally spreading lesion), RRA (residual or recurrent adenoma), SC1 (first surveillance colonoscopy after EMR), SERT (Sydney EMR recurrence tool)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Gastrointestinal EndoscopyReferences
- Cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 271-272
- Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 668-676
- Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 344-349
- Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study.Gut. 2014; 64: 57-65
- Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy. 2014; 46: 388-402
- Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.Endoscopy. 2013; 45: 842-864
- Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology. 2012; 143: 844-857
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gut. 2015; 65: 806-820
- Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia.Gastroenterology. 2011; 140: 1909-1918
- Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 90-95
- Wide field endoscopic resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia: current status and future directions.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10: 969-979
ERBE VIO 300 D, Product Information Guide. http://www.erbe-med.com/de/medical-technology/public/Products/Electrosurgery/Units-and-modules/VIO---300-D.707. Accessed September 7, 2016.
- A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon.Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2375-2382
Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, et al. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Bick BL, Ponugoti PL, Rex DK. High yield of synchronous lesions in referred patients with large lateral spreading colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
- Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 583-595
- The desired balance between treatment and curability in treatment planning for early gastric cancer.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 308-310
Desomer L, Tutticci N, Tate DJ, et al. A standardized imaging protocol is accurate in detecting recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
- Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55: 371-375
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE: D. Tate received a scholarship from the Westmead Medical Research Foundation. These funds were not used for this study. The Cancer Institute New South Wales provided funding for a research nurse and data manager to assist with the administration of the study. There was no influence from the Institution regarding study design or conduct, data collection, management, analysis or interpretation, preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
See CME section; p. 677.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Bourke at [email protected]