Advertisement
Oral abstract| Volume 85, ISSUE 5, SUPPLEMENT , AB57-AB58, May 2017

206 An International, Multicenter, Comparative Trial of Eus-Guided Gastrogastrostomy-Assisted Ercp Versus Enteroscopy-Assisted Ercp in Patients With Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Anatomy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.060
206 An International, Multicenter, Comparative Trial of Eus-Guided Gastrogastrostomy-Assisted Ercp Versus Enteroscopy-Assisted Ercp in Patients With Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Anatomy
Previous Article154 Computer-Aided Diagnosis Based on Endocytoscopy With Narrow-Band Imaging Allows Accurate Diagnosis of Diminutive Colorectal Lesions
Next Article207 The International Cooperative Study Evaluating the Effect of Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metallic Stents Compared With Plastic Stents for Resolution of Refractory Pancreatic Ductal Strictures and Pain Relief in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
      ERCP is challenging in patients with RYGB anatomy, with cannulation rates of enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (e-ERCP) reported at 40-70%. EUS-guided gastrogastric (GG) fistula creation is a promising novel technique to access the excluded stomach in order to facilitate conventional ERCP. While EUS-GG-ERCP potentially offers multiple advantages in these patients, it is currently unknown how this approach compares to e-ERCP.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Article info

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.060

      Copyright

      © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX