Advertisement
Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 88, ISSUE 5, P787-794, November 2018

Impact of fellow training level on adverse events and operative time for common pediatric GI endoscopic procedures

  • Jacob A. Mark
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Jacob A. Mark, MD, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B290, Aurora, CO 80045.
    Affiliations
    Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert E. Kramer
    Affiliations
    Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Background and Aims

      Previous studies on pediatric endoscopic training have not examined in detail if adverse events (AEs) are affected by the fellow’s training level. We aimed to determine whether trainee presence and educational level increase AEs or operative time (OT) for pediatric intestinal endoscopy.

      Methods

      This was a prospective observational study of AEs for all endoscopic procedures and retrospective analysis of OT (time of endoscope insertion until removal) for a sample of specified procedures at a tertiary children’s hospital. AEs were categorized by severity grades: 1, home management; 2, outpatient evaluation; 3, hospitalization and/or repeat endoscopy; 4, surgery and/or intensive care unit admission; and 5, death.

      Results

      A total of 15,886 procedures (6257 with trainee) including 1627 therapeutic procedures (733 with trainee) were analyzed for AEs. Four hundred thirteen total AEs (2.60%) and 213 AEs grade 2 to 4 (1.34%) were identified. Fellow presence at any training level did not increase AE rates for any procedures. Median OT for 3762 EGDs decreased from 17 to 11 minutes from the first quarter to the fourth quarter of first-year fellowship and then remained stable. EGDs without fellows were shorter (9 minutes, P < .0001) compared with any training level. Median times of 1291 colonoscopies with EGD decreased from 55 to 51 to 47 minutes for fellows in the first half, second half of first-year fellowship, and second and third year, respectively. Attendings alone were faster (37 minutes, P < .0001).

      Conclusions

      Current pediatric endoscopic training for is safe regardless of fellow training level. Trainee efficiency improves during and after fellowship.

      Abbreviations:

      AE (adverse event), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists), IQR (interquartile range), OT (operative time), Q (quarter of academic year), SD (standard deviation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Haubner L.Y.
        • Barry J.S.
        • Johnston L.C.
        • et al.
        Neonatal intubation performance: room for improvement in tertiary neonatal intensive care units.
        Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 1359-1364
        • Simoff M.J.
        Learning to look through the bronchoscope.
        Chest. 2015; 148: 301-303
        • Leong A.B.
        • Green C.G.
        • Kurland G.
        • et al.
        A survey of training in pediatric flexible bronchoscopy.
        Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014; 49: 605-610
        • Leichtner A.M.
        • Gillis L.A.
        • Gupta S.
        • et al.
        NASPGHAN guidelines for training in pediatric gastroenterology.
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013; 56: S1-S8
        • Blum M.G.
        • Powers T.W.
        • Sundaresan S.
        Bronchoscopy simulator effectively prepares junior residents to competently perform basic clinical bronchoscopy.
        Ann Thoracic Surg. 2004; 78: 287-291
        • Bagai A.
        • O’Brien S.
        • Al Lawati H.
        • et al.
        Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization.
        Circulation Cardiovasc Intervent. 2012; 5: 672-679
        • Nishisaki A.
        • Donoghue A.J.
        • Colborn S.
        • et al.
        Effect of just-in-time simulation training on tracheal intubation procedure safety in the pediatric intensive care unit.
        Anesthesiology. 2010; 113: 214-223
        • Lightdale J.R.
        • Newburg A.R.
        • Mahoney L.B.
        • et al.
        Fellow perceptions of training using computer-based endoscopy simulators.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 13-18
        • Kneebone R.L.
        • Nestel D.
        • Vincent C.
        • et al.
        Complexity, risk and simulation in learning procedural skills.
        Med Educ. 2007; 41: 808-814
        • Depew W.T.
        • Hookey L.C.
        • Vanner S.J.
        • et al.
        Opportunity costs of gastrointestinal endoscopic training in Canada.
        Can J Gastroenterol. 2010; 24: 733-738
        • Bielawska B.
        • Day A.G.
        • Lieberman D.A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12: 85-92
        • Thakkar K.
        • El-Serag H.B.
        • Mattek N.
        • et al.
        Complications of pediatric EGD: a 4-year experience in PEDS-CORI.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65: 213-221
        • Thakkar K.
        • El-Serag H.B.
        • Mattek N.
        • et al.
        Complications of pediatric colonoscopy: a five-year multicenter experience.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 515-520
        • Freeman M.L.
        • DiSario J.A.
        • Nelson D.B.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54: 425-434
        • Kramer R.E.
        • Narkewicz M.R.
        Adverse events following gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: classifications, characterizations, and implications.
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016; 62: 828-833
        • Anderson M.L.
        • Pasha T.M.
        • Leighton J.A.
        Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 3418
        • Wilder R.T.
        • Flick R.P.
        • Sprung J.
        • et al.
        Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort.
        Anesthesiology. 2009; 110: 796-804
        • Ing C.H.
        • DiMaggio C.J.
        • Malacova E.
        • et al.
        Comparative analysis of outcome measures used in examining neurodevelopmental effects of early childhood anesthesia exposure.
        Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 1319-1332
        • Cotton P.B.
        • Eisen G.M.
        • Aabakken L.
        • et al.
        A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.
        Gastrointest Endos. 2010; 71: 446-454
        • Papanikolaou I.S.
        • Karatzas P.S.
        • Varytimiadis L.T.
        • et al.
        Effective colonoscopy training techniques: strategies to improve patient outcomes.
        Adv Med Educ Practice. 2016; 7: 201-210
        • Davidson A.J.
        • Disma N.
        • de Graaff J.C.
        • et al.
        Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2016; 387: 239-250
      1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare claims processing manual: physicians/nonphysician practitioners. Available at: www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Downloads/clm104c12.pdf 2017. Accessed April 6, 2018.

        • Bleustein C.
        • Rothschild D.B.
        • Valen A.
        • et al.
        Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care.
        Am J Managed Care. 2014; 20: 393-400
        • Thornley P.
        • Al Beshir M.
        • Gregor J.
        • et al.
        Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: a prospective study.
        World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 8: 232-238