Advertisement

Impact of water exchange colonoscopy on endoscopy room efficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      Background and Aims

      Separate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed water exchange (WE) colonoscopy outperformed other techniques in minimizing insertion pain and optimizing adenoma detection rate. Longer insertion time required for removal of infused water, residual air, and feces might have hampered its wider adoption. We evaluate the impact of WE compared with air or carbon dioxide insufflation (GAS) on room turnaround efficiency measured by cecal intubation, withdrawal, and total procedure times.

      Methods

      With a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, we identified RCTs (published before March 18, 2018) that compared WE with GAS. We focused on parameters of turnaround efficiency and patient-centered outcomes.

      Results

      We analyzed 8371 subjects from 17 studies. Demographics and indications were comparable. Mean cecal intubation time (± standard deviation) was WE 12.5 ± 6.1 minutes versus GAS 11.1 ± 7.0 minutes, with a mean difference of 1.4 ± 3.4 minutes. Six studies showed significant differences in insertion time, with mean cecal intubation times of 11.6 ± 5.1 minutes for WE versus 7.7 ± 5.2 minutes for GAS, with a mean difference of 3.9 ± 1.1 minutes. Mean withdrawal time was similar. Mean total procedure time was WE 26.0 ± 9.7 versus GAS 24.2 ± 9.6, with a mean difference of 1.8 ± 6.2 minutes. All mean procedure times were significantly different. Patient-centered outcomes revealed that patients examined with WE had significantly lower real-time insertion pain score, less need for sedation, and higher willingness to repeat the procedure.

      Conclusions

      Based on parameters of procedural time, the impact of WE colonoscopy on endoscopy room turnaround yields an increase in total procedure time of about 2 minutes and is associated with significant improvement in specific patient-centered outcomes.

      Abbreviations:

      ADR (adenoma detection rate), CI (confidence interval), CrI (credible interval), GAS (air or carbon dioxide insufflation), RCT (randomized controlled trial), SD (standard deviation), WE (water exchange)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cadoni S.
        • Leung F.W.
        Water-assisted colonoscopy.
        Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017; 15: 135-154
        • Hsieh Y.-H.
        • Koo M.
        • Leung F.W.
        A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 1390-1400
        • Cadoni S.
        • Falt P.
        • Gallittu P.
        • et al.
        Water exchange is the least painful colonoscope insertion technique and increases completion of unsedated colonoscopy.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13: 1972-1980
        • Jia H.
        • Pan Y.
        • Guo X.
        • et al.
        Water exchange method significantly improves adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 568-576
        • Hsieh Y.-H.
        • Tseng C.-W.
        • Hu C.-T.
        • et al.
        Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 86: 192-201
        • Cadoni S.
        • Falt P.
        • Rondonotti E.
        • et al.
        Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 456-467
        • Zhang Z.
        • Wu Y.
        • Sun G.
        • et al.
        Bayesian network meta-analysis: efficacy of air insufflation, CO2 insufflation, water exchange, and water immersion in colonoscopy.
        Dig Endosc. 2018; 30: 321-331
        • Leung F.W.
        • Koo M.
        • Cadoni S.
        • et al.
        Water exchange produces significantly higher adenoma detection rate than water immersion: pooled data from 2 multisite randomized controlled trials.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. Epub 2018 Mar 2;
        • Wasan S.K.
        • Schroy 3rd, P.C.
        Water-assisted unsedated colonoscopy: Does the end justify the means?.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 551-553
        • Rex D.K.
        Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 1401-1403
        • de Groen P.C.
        Polyps, pain, and propofol: Is water exchange the panacea for all?.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 578-580
        • Rex D.K.
        • Schoenfeld P.S.
        • Cohen J.
        • et al.
        Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110: 72-90
        • Kaminski M.F.
        • Thomas-Gibson S.
        • Bugajski M.
        • et al.
        Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.
        United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5: 309-334
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0.
        The Cochrane Collaboration, Cambridge, UK2011
        • Leung J.W.
        • Mann S.K.
        • Siao-Salera R.
        • et al.
        A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 505-510
        • Leung F.W.
        • Harker J.O.
        • Jackson G.
        • et al.
        A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 693-700
        • Leung J.
        • Mann S.
        • Siao-Salera R.
        • et al.
        A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 103-110
        • Ramirez F.C.
        • Leung F.W.
        A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
        J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011; 1: 130-135
        • Luo H.
        • Zhang L.
        • Liu X.
        • et al.
        Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 767-773
        • Cadoni S.
        • Gallittu P.
        • Sanna S.
        • et al.
        A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy.
        Endoscopy. 2014; 46: 212-218
        • Garborg K.
        • Kaminski M.F.
        • Lindenburger W.
        • et al.
        Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
        Endoscopy. 2015; 47: 192-199
        • Cadoni S.
        • Sanna S.
        • Gallittu P.
        • et al.
        A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 557-566
        • Wang X.
        • Luo H.
        • Xiang Y.
        • et al.
        Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy—a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015; 50: 916-923
        • Arai M.
        • Okimoto K.
        • Ishigami H.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation during colonoscopy without sedation.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016; 31: 1217-1223
        • Cadoni S.
        • Falt P.
        • Gallittu P.
        • et al.
        Impact of carbon dioxide insufflation and water exchange on postcolonoscopy outcomes in patients receiving on-demand sedation: a randomized controlled trial.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 210-218
        • Azevedo R.
        • Leitão C.
        • Pinto J.
        • et al.
        Can water exchange improve patient tolerance in unsedated colonoscopy? A prospective comparative study.
        GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018; 25: 166-174
      1. Collins Dictionary. Available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com. Accessed March 26, 2018.

        • Ramirez F.C.
        • Leung F.W.
        The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist.
        J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011; 1: 97-101
        • Finn 3rd, R.T.
        • Boyd A.
        • Lin L.
        • et al.
        Bolus administration of fentanyl and midazolam for colonoscopy increases endoscopy unit efficiency and safety compared with titrated sedation.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15: 1419-1426
        • Cooper G.S.
        • Kou T.D.
        • Rex D.K.
        Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 551-556
        • Sipe B.W.
        • Rex D.K.
        • Latinovich D.
        • et al.
        Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55: 815-825
        • Ulmer B.J.
        • Hansen J.J.
        • Overley C.A.
        • et al.
        Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 1: 425-432
        • Day L.W.
        • Belson D.
        • Dessouky M.
        • et al.
        Optimizing efficiency and operations at a California safety-net endoscopy center: a modeling and simulation approach.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 762-773
        • Day L.W.
        • Belson D.
        Studying and incorporating efficiency into gastrointestinal endoscopy centers.
        Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015; 2015: 764153
        • Singh H.
        • Poluha W.
        • Cheang M.
        • et al.
        Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 4 (h): CD006268
        • McQuaid K.R.
        • Laine L.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 910-923
        • Zhao S.B.
        • Wan H.
        • Li Z.S.
        • et al.
        Is dynamic position changes an effective way to improve the adenoma detection rate?.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 1359-1361
        • Yen A.W.
        • Yung V.Y.
        • Leung J.W.
        • et al.
        Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection—a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon.
        J Interv Gastroenterol. 2015; 5: 3-9