Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Abbreviations:
CIR (cecal intubation rate), DIP (drop in performance), JETS (Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training System), KPI (key performance indicator), PCC (provision colonoscopy certification), PDR (polyp detection rate), SAE (serious adverse event)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Gastrointestinal EndoscopyReferences
- Quality assurance of training.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 397-407
- Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death.Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 98-105
- Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1298-1306
- Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening.BMJ. 2008; 336: 480-483
- UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.Gut. 2016; 65: 1923-1929
- Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5: 309-334
- Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 410-416
- Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 355-366
- Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 319-324
- An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database.Gut. 2014; 63: 1746-1754
- JAG trainee certification process: colonoscopy (provisional and full).(Available at:) (Accessed January 15, 2018)
- Changes in scoring of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) forms and the impact on competence assessment.Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 770-778
- The validity and reliability of a direct observation of procedural skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 591-597
- Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 2355-2361
- UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.Gut. 2016; 65: 1923-1929
Biswas S, Alrubaiy L, China L, et al. Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BSG trainees’ national survey and strategic planning for the future. Frontline Gastroenterol. Epub 2017 Sept 23.
- Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology. 2011; 140: 65-72
- A new composite measure of colonoscopy: the performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI).Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 40-51
- The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK.Gut. 2013; 62: 242
- The learning curve to achieve satisfactory completion rates in upper GI endoscopy: an analysis of a national training database.Gut. 2017; 66: 1022-1030
- Ensuring competence in endoscopy.(Available at:) (Accessed January 15, 2018)
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE: The following author disclosed financial relationships relevant to this publication: K. Siau: Research fellow on behalf of the Joint Advisory Group; R.M. Valori, Co-Director, AnderVal Ltd; P. Dunckley, Advisory Committee, Joint Advisory Group. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
See CME section; p. 625.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Siau [email protected]
Identification
Copyright
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- The path to quality colonoscopy continues after graduationGastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 89Issue 3
- PreviewThe effort over the past decade to improve quality in colonoscopy was marked by several essential steps forward. These included definition of quality indicators,1,2 the development and validation of objective skills assessment tools such as the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy assessment of competency in endoscopy tool, the direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS),3,4 and the investment in infrastructure to track and benchmark performance for key indicators such as the GI quality improvement consortium (GIQuIC)5 and the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy - Endoscopy Training System eportfolio in the United Kingdom.
- Full-Text
- Preview