Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 89, ISSUE 2, P329-339, February 2019

A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device

Published:October 24, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.026

      Background and Aims

      Several studies have compared EUS-guided FNA with fine-needle biopsy (FNB), but none have proven superiority. We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the performance of a commonly used 25-gauge FNA needle with a newly designed 20-gauge FNB needle.


      Consecutive patients with a solid lesion were randomized in this international multicenter study between a 25-gauge FNA (EchoTip Ultra) or a 20-gauge FNB needle (ProCore). The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy for malignancy and the Bethesda classification (non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, malignant). Technical success, safety, and sample quality were also assessed. Multivariable and supplementary analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.


      A total of 608 patients were allocated to FNA (n = 306) or FNB (n = 302); 312 pancreatic lesions (51%), 147 lymph nodes (24%), and 149 other lesions (25%). Technical success rate was 100% for the 25-gauge FNA and 99% for the 20-gauge FNB needle (P = .043), with no differences in adverse events. The 20-gauge FNB needle outperformed 25-gauge FNA in terms of histologic yield (77% vs 44%, P < .001), accuracy for malignancy (87% vs 78%, P = .002) and Bethesda classification (82% vs 72%, P = .002). This was robust when corrected for indication, lesion size, number of passes, and presence of an on-site pathologist (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-8.56; P = .004), and did not differ among centers (P = .836).


      The 20-gauge FNB needle outperformed the 25-gauge FNA needle in terms of histologic yield and diagnostic accuracy. This benefit was irrespective of the indication and was consistent among participating centers, supporting the general applicability of our findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02167074.)


      FNB (fine-needle biopsy), ROSE (rapid on-site pathology evaluation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Iglesias-Garcia J.
        • Dominguez-Munoz J.E.
        • Abdulkader I.
        • et al.
        Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 1705-1710
        • Kim G.H.
        • Cho Y.K.
        • Kim E.Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49: 347-354
        • Iwashita T.
        • Nakai Y.
        • Samarasena J.B.
        • et al.
        High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
        Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2013; 77: 909-915
        • Laragh A.
        • Iglesias-Garcia J.
        • Poley J.W.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 3733-3738
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hebert-Magee S.
        • Trevino J.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 321-327
        • Inoue T.
        • Okumura F.
        • Mizushima T.
        • et al.
        Assessment of factors affecting the usefulness and diagnostic yield of core biopsy needles with a side hole in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
        Gut Liver. 2016; 10: 51-57
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hawes R.
        • Varadarajulu S.
        A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
        Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 339-349
        • Hucl T.
        • Wee E.
        • Anuradha S.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study.
        Endoscopy. 2013; 45: 792-798
        • Altai A.
        • Beuvon F.
        • Grabar S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
        United European Gastroenterol J. 2015; 3: 343-352
        • Dwyer J.
        • Pantanowitz L.
        • Ohori N.P.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
        Cancer Cytopathol. 2016; 124: 110-121
        • Kamata K.
        • Kitano M.
        • Yasukawa S.
        • et al.
        Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.
        Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 632-638
        • Aadam A.A.
        • Wani S.
        • Amick A.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.
        Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4: E497-E505
        • Lee B.S.
        • Cho C.M.
        • Jung M.K.
        • et al.
        Comparison of histologic core portions acquired from a core biopsy needle and a conventional needle in solid mass lesions: a prospective randomized trial.
        Gut Liver. 2017; 11: 559-566
        • Lee Y.N.
        • Moon J.H.
        • Kim H.K.
        • et al.
        Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
        Endoscopy. 2014; 46: 1056-1062
        • Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo J.
        • Ragunath K.
        • Wireko M.
        • et al.
        Multicentre randomised trial comparing EUS guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA B) in sampling solid pancreatic mass lesions: preliminary results from the ProCore trial.
        Gut. 2015; 64: A213
        • Othman M.O.
        • Abdelfatah M.M.
        • Padilla O.
        • et al.
        The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles.
        Diagn Cytopathol. 2017; 45: 426-432
        • Vanbiervliet G.
        • Napoléon B.
        • Saint Paul M.C.
        • et al.
        Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
        Endoscopy. 2014; 46: 1063-1070
        • Wang J.
        • Wu X.
        • Yin P.
        • et al.
        Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
        Trials. 2016; 17: 198
        • Cheng B.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Chen Q.
        • et al.
        Analysis of fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of pancreatic and abdominal masses: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16: 1314-1321
        • Polkowski M.
        • Jenssen C.
        • Kaye P.
        • et al.
        Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 989-1006
        • Pocock S.J.
        Clinical trials: a practical approach.
        John Wiley, Chichester1983
        • Meyer J.M.
        • Ginsburg G.S.
        The path to personalized medicine.
        Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002; 6: 434-438
        • Bournet B.
        • Gayral M.
        • Torrisani J.
        • et al.
        Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 10758-10768
        • Jameson J.L.
        • Longo D.L.
        Precision medicine--personalized, problematic, and promising.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2229-2234
        • Zhu P.
        • Sun S.
        Endoscopic ultrasound pin-points the precision medicine for pancreatic cancer.
        Endosc Ultrasound. 2016; 5: 1-3
        • Van Riet P.A.
        • Cahen D.L.
        • Poley J.W.
        • Bruno M.J.
        Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey.
        Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4: E360-E370
        • Affolter K.E.
        • Schmidt R.L.
        • Matynia A.P.
        • et al.
        Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58: 1026-1034
        • Carrara S.
        • Anderloni A.
        • Jovani M.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized study comparing 25-G and 22-G needles of a new platform for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid masses.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2016; 48: 49-54
        • Madhoun M.F.
        • Wani S.B.
        • Rastogi A.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2013; 45: 86-92
        • Xu M.M.
        • Jia H.Y.
        • Yan L.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of two different size needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e5802
        • Saxena P.
        • El Zein M.
        • Stevens T.
        • et al.
        Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
        Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 497-504
        • Pitman M.B.
        • Centeno B.A.
        • Ali S.Z.
        • et al.
        Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.
        Cytojournal. 2014; 11: 3
        • Bosman F.T.
        • Carneiro F.
        • Hruban R.H.
        • Theise N.D.
        WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.
        4th ed. IARC Press, Lyon2010
        • Fletcher C.D.
        • Berman J.J.
        • Corless C.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach.
        Hum Pathol. 2002; 33: 459-465
        • Iwashita T.
        • Yasuda I.
        • Mukai T.
        • et al.
        Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 177-185
        • Park S.W.
        • Chung M.J.
        • Lee S.H.
        • et al.
        Prospective study for comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition using 25- and 22-gauge core biopsy needles in solid pancreatic masses.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0154401
        • Facciorusso A.
        • Stasi E.
        • Di Maso M.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: a meta-analysis.
        United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5: 846-853
        • Molenberghs G.
        • Verbeke G.
        Linear mixed models for longitudinal data.
        Springer, New York2009
        • Jhala N.
        • Jhala D.
        Definitions in tissue acquisition: core biopsy, cell block, and beyond.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014; 24: 19-27
        • Ribeiro A.
        • Vazquez-Sequeiros E.
        • Wiersema L.M.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53: 485-491
        • Layfield L.J.
        • Ehya H.
        • Filie A.C.
        • et al.
        Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.
        Cytojournal. 2014; 11: 4
        • Diaz Del Arco C.
        • Esteban Lopez-Jamar J.M.
        • Ortega Medina L.
        • et al.
        Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: correlation between Ki-67 index in cytological samples and clinical behavior.
        Diagn Cytopathol. 2017; 45: 29-35
        • Arena M.
        • Eusebi L.H.
        • Pellicano R.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound core needle for diagnosing of solid pancreatic lesions: is rapid on- site evaluation really necessary?.
        Minerva Med. 2017; 108: 547-553
        • Fabbri C.
        • Fuccio L.
        • Fornelli A.
        • et al.
        The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 225-230
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hebert-Magee S.
        • Navaneethan U.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology: results of a randomised trial.
        Gut. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-31515
        • Dumonceau J.M.
        • Polkowski M.
        • Larghi A.
        • et al.
        Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.
        Endoscopy. 2011; 43: 897-912
        • Polkowski M.
        • Gerke W.
        • Jarosz D.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study.
        Endoscopy. 2009; 41: 329-334
        • Polkowski M.
        • Larghi A.
        • Weynand B.
        • et al.
        Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline.
        Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 190-206
        • Kong F.
        • Zhu J.
        • Kong X.
        • et al.
        Rapid on-site evaluation does not improve endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration adequacy in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0163056
        • Kappelle W.F.W.
        • Van Leerdam M.E.
        • Schwartz M.P.
        • et al.
        Rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes does not increase diagnostic yield: a randomized, multicenter trial.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 677-685
        • Rodrigues-Pinto E.
        • Jalaj S.
        • Grimm I.S.
        • et al.
        Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 1040-1046
        • Nayar M.K.
        • Paranandi B.
        • Dawwas M.F.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 1017-1024
        • DiMaio C.J.
        • Kolb J.M.
        • Benias P.C.
        • et al.
        Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study.
        Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4: E974-E979
        • Jovani M.
        • Abidi W.M.
        • Lee L.S.
        Novel fork-tip needles versus standard needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid masses of the upper GI tract: a matched cohort study.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017; 52: 784-787
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hebert-Magee S.
        • Hasan M.K.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: Initial assessment.
        Dig Endosc. 2017; 29: 338-346