Advertisement

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2018

Published:March 27, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.020
      The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy’s Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board reviewed original endoscopy-related articles published during 2018 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other leading medical and gastroenterology journals. Votes from each individual member were tallied to identify a consensus list of 10 topic areas of major advances in GI endoscopy. Individual board members summarized important findings published in these 10 areas of adenoma detection, bariatric endoscopy, EMR/submucosal dissection/full-thickness resection, artificial intelligence, expandable metal stents for palliation of biliary obstruction, pancreatic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents, endoscope reprocessing, Barrett’s esophagus, interventional EUS, and GI bleeding. This document summarizes these “Top 10” endoscopic advances of 2018.

      Abbreviations:

      ADR (adenoma detection rate), AI (artificial intelligence), ATP (adenosine triphosphate), BE (Barrett’s esophagus), CAD (computer-aided diagnosis), CSEMS (covered self-expanding metal stent), EFTR (endoscopic full-thickness resection), ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), EUS-BD (EUS-guided biliary drainage), FCSEMS (fully covered self-expanding metal stent), LAMS (lumen-apposing metal stent), NBI (narrow-band imaging), RCT (randomized controlled trial), USEMS (uncovered self-expanding metal stent), WON (walled-off necrosis)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fuccio L.
        • Frazzoni L.
        • Hassan C.
        • et al.
        Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 589-597
        • Shi X.
        • Tian D.
        • Ye X.
        • et al.
        Is water exchange superior to water immersion in detecting adenomas during colonoscopies? Results from a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
        Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 30679-30693
        • Zhang Z.
        • Wu Y.
        • Sun G.
        • et al.
        Bayesian network meta-analysis: efficacy of air insufflation, CO2 insufflation, water exchange, and water immersion in colonoscopy.
        Dig Endosc. 2018; 30: 321-331
      1. Jia H, Koo M, Hsieh YH, et al. Factors associated with adenoma detection in propofol-sedated patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

        • Facciorusso A.
        • Del Prete V.
        • Buccino R.V.
        • et al.
        Comparative efficacy of colonoscope distal attachment devices in increasing rates of adenoma detection: a network meta-analysis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16: 1209-1219
        • Williet N.
        • Tournier Q.
        • Vernet C.
        • et al.
        Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 846-860
        • Desai M.
        • Bilal M.
        • Hamade N.
        • et al.
        Increasing adenoma detection rates in the right side of the colon comparing retroflexion with a second forward view: a systematic review.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 89: 453-459
        • Shirin H.
        • Shpak B.
        • Epshtein J.
        • et al.
        G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 545-553
        • Chiang A.L.
        • Steiner G.
        • Thompson C.C.
        The Association of Bariatric Endoscopy as @ABEBariatric: an initial 9-month experience of establishing a professional society social media presence.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 136-138
        • Vyas D.
        • Deshpande K.
        • Pandya Y.
        Advances in endoscopic balloon therapy for weight loss and its limitations.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23: 7813-7817
        • Balejko E.
        • Balejko J.
        • Plust D.
        Assessment of the effect of dietary modifications and bioenteric intragastric balloon treatment on the changes of some morphological and biochemical parameters in obese patients.
        Ann Nutr Metab. 2018; 73: 290-301
        • Tate C.M.
        • Geliebter A.
        Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: FDA safety updates.
        Adv Ther. 2018; 35: 1-4
        • Alsabah S.
        • Al Haddad E.
        • Ekrouf S.
        • et al.
        The safety and efficacy of the procedureless intragastric balloon.
        Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; 14: 311-317
        • Alqahtani A.
        • Al-Darwish A.
        • Mahmoud A.E.
        • et al.
        Short-term outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in 1000 consecutive patients.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 1132-1138
        • Schulman A.R.
        • Kumar N.
        • Thompson C.C.
        Transoral outlet reduction: a comparison of purse-string with interrupted stitch technique.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1222-1228
        • Kumbhari V.
        • Lehmann S.
        • Schlichting N.
        • et al.
        Gastric mucosal devitalization is safe and effective in reducing body weight and visceral adiposity in a porcine model.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 175-184
        • Hadefi A.
        • Huberty V.
        • Lemmers A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
        Dig Dis. 2018; 36: 322-324
        • Caiazzo R.
        • Branche J.
        • Daoudi M.
        • et al.
        Increased postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) production after endoscopic gastrointestinal bypass using the Cousin lumen-apposing stent in a porcine model.
        Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 14-21
        • Klein A.
        • Tate D.J.
        • Jayasekeran V.
        • et al.
        Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: 604-613
        • Papastergiou V.
        • Paraskeva K.D.
        • Fragaki M.
        • et al.
        Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.
        Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 403-411
        • Yamada S.
        • Hatta W.
        • Shimosegawa T.
        • et al.
        Different risk factors between early and late cancer recurrences in patients without additional surgery after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 950-960
      2. Zhao B, Zhang J, Zhang J, et al. Risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis for early gastric cancer patients who underwent non-curative endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

        • Kinoshita S.
        • Uraoka T.
        • Nishizawa T.
        • et al.
        The role of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with ulcerative colitis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1079-1084
        • Andrisani G.
        • Soriani P.
        • Manno M.
        • et al.
        Colo-rectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with the over-the-scope device (FTRD®): A multicenter Italian experience.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2019; 51: 375-381
        • Schmidt A.
        • Beyna T.
        • Schumacher B.
        • et al.
        Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications.
        Gut. 2018; 67: 1280-1289
        • Urban G.
        • Tripathi P.
        • Alkayali T.
        • et al.
        Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 1069-1078
        • Chen P.J.
        • Lin M.C.
        • Lai M.J.
        • et al.
        Accurate classification of diminutive colorectal polyps using computer-aided analysis.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 154: 568-575
        • Mori Y.
        • Kudo S.E.
        • Misawa M.
        • et al.
        Real-time use of artificial intelligence in identification of diminutive polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 357-366
        • Zhu Y.
        • Wang Q.C.
        • Xu M.D.
        • et al.
        Application of convolutional neural network in the diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer based on conventional endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 806-815
        • Hirasawa T.
        • Aoyama K.
        • Tanimoto T.
        • et al.
        Application of artificial intelligence using a convolutional neural network for detecting gastric cancer in endoscopic images.
        Gastric Cancer. 2018; 21: 653-660
        • Horie Y.
        • Yoshio T.
        • Aoyama K.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic outcomes of esophageal cancer by artificial intelligence using convolutional neural networks.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 25-32
        • Jang S.
        • Stevens T.
        • Parsi M.
        • et al.
        Association of covered metallic stents with cholecystitis and stent migration in malignant biliary stricture.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1061-1070
        • Conio M.
        • Mangiavillano B.
        • Caruso A.
        • et al.
        Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stent for palliation of primary malignant extrahepatic biliary strictures: a randomized multicenter study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 283-291
        • Hammad T.
        • Khan M.A.
        • Alastal Y.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stents in management of pancreatic fluid collections: are they better than plastic stents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 63: 289-301
      3. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, et al. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

        • Chen Y.I.
        • Barkun A.N.
        • Adam V.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing lumen-apposing metal stents with plastic stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 267-276
      4. Yan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, et al. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

        • Mudireddy P.R.
        • Sethi A.
        • Siddiqui A.A.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided drainage of postsurgical fluid collections using lumen-apposing metal stents: a multicenter study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1256-1262
        • Tsuchiya T.
        • Teoh A.Y.B.
        • Itoi T.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1138-1146
        • Amateau S.K.
        • Lim C.H.
        • McDonald N.M.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis with lumen-apposing metal stent: feasibility, safety, and efficacy.
        Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 1445-1451
        • Bartles R.L.
        • Leggett J.E.
        • Hove S.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of single versus double high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes using standard automated reprocessing.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 306-313
        • Higa J.T.
        • Choe J.
        • Tombs D.
        • et al.
        Optimizing duodenoscope reprocessing: rigorous assessment of a culture and quarantine protocol.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 223-229
        • Quan E.
        • Mahmood R.
        • Naik A.
        • et al.
        Use of adenosine triphosphate to audit reprocessing of flexible endoscopes with an elevator mechanism.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 1272-1277
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Girotra M.
        • Huang R.J.
        • et al.
        Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 601-611
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Huang R.J.
        • Banerjee S.
        Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 124-132
        • Dulai G.S.
        • Guha S.
        • Kahn K.L.
        • et al.
        Preoperative prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.
        Gastroenterology. 2002; 122: 26-33
        • Ross-Innes C.S.
        • Debiram-Beecham I.
        • O'Donovan M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study.
        PLoS Med. 2015; 12: e1001780
      5. Kadri SR, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ 341:c4372.

        • Moinova H.R.
        • LaFramboise T.
        • Lutterbaugh J.D.
        • et al.
        Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus.
        Sci Transl Med. 2018; 10
        • Iyer P.G.
        • Taylor W.R.
        • Johnson M.L.
        • et al.
        Highly discriminant methylated DNA markers for the non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1156-1166
        • Codipilly D.C.
        • Chandar A.K.
        • Singh S.
        • et al.
        The effect of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 154: 2068-2086
        • Visrodia K.
        • Zakko L.
        • Singh S.
        • et al.
        Cryotherapy for persistent Barrett's esophagus after radiofrequency ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1396-1404
        • Park J.K.
        • Woo Y.S.
        • Noh D.H.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 277-282
        • Paik W.H.
        • Lee T.H.
        • Park D.H.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 987-997
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Navaneethan U.
        • Hasan M.
        • et al.
        Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 9-17
        • Anderloni A.
        • Fugazza A.
        • Troncone E.
        • et al.
        Single-stage EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 69-76
        • Mohan B.P.
        • Shakhatreh M.
        • Garg R.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 238-246
        • Mok S.R.S.
        • Diehl D.L.
        • Johal A.S.
        • et al.
        A prospective pilot comparison of wet and dry heparinized suction for EUS-guided liver biopsy (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 919-925
        • Samarasena J.B.
        • Huang J.Y.
        • Tsujino T.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.
        VideoGIE. 2018; 3: 361-363
        • Bukhari M.
        • Kowalski T.
        • Nieto J.
        • et al.
        An international, multicenter, comparative trial of EUS-guided gastrogastrostomy-assisted ERCP versus enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 486-494
        • Oh D.
        • Song T.J.
        • Cho D.H.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 289-298
        • Oakland K.
        • Guy R.
        • Uberoi R.
        • et al.
        Acute lower GI bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes in the first nationwide audit.
        Gut. 2018; 67: 654-662
        • Pittayanon R.
        • Rerknimitr R.
        • Barkun A.
        Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in patients with malignant GI bleeding treated with a novel endoscopically delivered hemostatic powder.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 994-1002
        • Akutsu D.
        • Narasaka T.
        • Kobayashi K.
        • et al.
        Newly developed endoscopic detachable snare ligation therapy for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: a multicenter phase II trial (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 370-377
        • Schmidt A.
        • Golder S.
        • Goetz M.
        • et al.
        Over-the-scope clips are more effective than standard endoscopic therapy for patients with recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcers.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 674-686
        • Brandler J.
        • Baruah A.
        • Zeb M.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of over-the-scope clips in management of high-risk gastrointestinal bleeding.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16: 690-696
        • Cook D.
        • Guyatt G.
        Prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal bleeding in hospitalized patients.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 2506-2516
        • Abougergi M.S.
        • Peluso H.
        • Saltzman J.R.
        Thirty-day readmission among patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and effects on outcomes.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 38-46