Advertisement

Impact of wet storage and other factors on biofilm formation and contamination of patient-ready endoscopes: a narrative review

Published:September 12, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.043
      The 2019 U.S. Food and Drug Administration report indicates that the clinical studies undertaken by the 3 main GI endoscope manufacturers demonstrate 5.4% of patient-ready duodenoscopes remain culture positive for high-concern organisms. The root causes of this persistent contamination are poorly understood. The objectives of this review include summarizing (1) the impact of inadequate manual cleaning and inadequate drying during storage on the formation of build-up biofilm in endoscope channels, (2) the impact of defoaming agents used during patient procedures on drying efficacy, (3) the data showing the importance of build-up biofilm on persistent microbial survival, and (4) the potential impact of implementation of a quality systems approach in GI endoscopy reprocessing.

      Abbreviations:

      AER (automated endoscope reprocessor), BBF (build-up biofilm), CDC-HICPAC (Centers for Disease Control-Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee), CFU (colony-forming unit), CRE (carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae), FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air), HLD (high-level disinfection), MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism), MIFU (manufacturer's instructions for use), PAA (peracetic acid), QS (quality system), SEM (scanning electron microscopy), TB (traditional biofilm), VBNC (viable but nonculturable)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bernhardt J.
        • Sasse S.
        • Ludwig K.
        • et al.
        Update in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES).
        Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017; 33: 346-351
        • Carbonne A.
        • Thiolet J.M.
        • Fournier S.
        • et al.
        Control of a multi-hospital outbreak of KPC producing Klebsiella pneumoniae type 2 in France, September to October 2009.
        Euro Surveill. 2010; 15
        • Aumeran C.
        • Poincloux L.
        • Souweine B.
        • et al.
        Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
        Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 895-899
        • Kovaleva J.
        • Peters F.T.
        • van der Mei H.C.
        • et al.
        Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26: 231-254
        • Epstein L.
        • Hunter J.C.
        • Arwady M.A.
        • et al.
        New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase- producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes.
        JAMA. 2014; 312: 1447-1455
        • Wendorf K.A.
        • Kay M.
        • Baliga C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated AmpC Escherichia coli outbreak.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 634-642
        • Ross A.S.
        • Baliga C.
        • Verma P.
        • et al.
        A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 477-483
        • Humphries R.M.
        • Yang S.
        • Kim S.
        • et al.
        Duodenoscope-related outbreak of a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae identified using advanced molecular diagnostics.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65: 1159-1166
        • McCafferty C.E.
        • Aghajani M.J.
        • Abi-Hanna D.
        • et al.
        An update on gastrointestinal endoscopy-associated infections and their contributing factors.
        Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018; 17: 36
        • Wang P.
        • Xu T.
        • Ngamruengphong S.
        • et al.
        Rates of infection after colonoscopy and osophagogastroduodenoscopy in ambulatory surgery centres in the USA.
        Gut. 2018; 67: 1626-1636
        • Zimmerman F.S.
        • Assous M.V.
        • Bdolah-Abram T.
        • et al.
        Duration of carriage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae following hospital discharge.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 190-194
        • Li X.
        • Ye H.
        Clinical and mortality risk factors in bloodstream infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
        Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017; : 6212910
        • Ny P.
        • Nieberg P.
        • Wong-Beringer A.
        Impact of carbapenem resistance on epidemiology and outcomes of nonbacteremic Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.
        Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43: 1076-1080
      1. FDA orders duodenoscope manufacturers to conduct postmarket surveillance studies in health care facilities. Oct 5, 2015.
        (Available at:)
        • FDA
        Statement from Jeff Shuren, MD, Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, on continued efforts to assess duodenoscope contamination risk. April 12, 2019.
        (Available at:)
        • Pajkos A.
        • Vickery K.
        • Cossart Y.E.
        Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to failure of cleaning and decontamination?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2004; 58: 224-229
        • Alfa M.J.
        • Sitter D.L.
        In-hospital evaluation of contamination of duodenoscopes: a quantitative assessment of the effect of drying.
        J Hosp Infect. 1991; 19: 89-98
        • Ren-Pei W.
        • Hui-Jun X.
        • Ke Q.
        • et al.
        Correlation between the growth of bacterial biofilm in flexible endoscopes and endoscope reprocessing methods.
        Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 1203-1206
        • Alfa M.J.
        • Singh H.
        • Nugent Z.
        • et al.
        Simulated-use polytetrafluorethylene biofilm model: repeated rounds of complete reprocessing lead to accumulation of organic debris and viable bacteria.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 1284-1290
        • Johani K.
        • Hu H.
        • Santos L.
        • et al.
        Determination of bacterial species present in biofilm contaminating the channels of clinical endoscopes.
        Infect Dis Health. 2018; 23: 189-196
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Girotra M.
        • Huang R.J.
        • et al.
        Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 601-611.e1
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Huang R.J.
        • Banerjee S.
        Comparison of automated and manual drying in the eliminating residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 124-132.e2
        • Barakat M.T.
        • Huang R.J.
        • Banerjee S.
        Simethicone is retained in endoscopes despite reprocessing: impact of its use on working channel fluid retention and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence values (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 115-123
      2. Olympus Evis Exera II TJF Type Q180V Reprocessing Manual 2015 (Version RC2409 01).
        (Available at:)
        • Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee (PIDAC)
        Annex A. Minimizing the risk of bacterial transmission from patient to patient when using duodenoscopes.
        Annexed to: Best practices for cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of medical equipment/devices in all health care settings. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario), Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario. 2016; (Available at:)
        • Public Health Agency of Canada
        Infection prevention and control guideline for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy. Ottawa, ON: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada; 2010.
        (Available at:)
        • Canadian Standards Association
        CSA Z314.8-18. Canadian Medical Device Reprocessing.
        National Standard of Canada, Toronto, ON: CSA Group. 2018; (Available at:)
        https://store.csagroup.org/
        Date accessed: March 26, 2019
      3. ANSI/AAMI ST91:2015 Flexible and semi-rigid endoscope processing in health care facilities. 2015.
        (Available at:)
        • Beilenhoff U.
        • Neumann C.S.
        • Rey J.F.
        • et al.
        ESGE-ESGENA guideline: cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 939-957
        • Beilenhoff U.
        • Biering H.
        • Blum R.
        • et al.
        GENCA/GESA/AGEA Infection Control in Endoscopy. 2010.
        (Available at:)
        • Beilenhoff U.
        • Biering H.
        • Blum R.
        • et al.
        Prevention of multidrug-resistant infections from contaminated duodenoscopes: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA).
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49 (1098-6)
        • AORN
        Guideline at a glance: processing flexible endoscopes.
        AORN J. 2016; 104: 610-615
      4. Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (SGNA). Standards of infection prevention in reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. 2016. Available at: www.SGNA.org. Accessed March 29, 2019.

        • British Society of Gastroenterology
        Guidance for decontamination of equipment for gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2017.
        (Available at:)
        • Petersen B.T.
        • Cohen J.
        • Hambrick III, R.D.
        • et al.
        • Reprocessing Guideline Task Force
        Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 282-294.e1
        • Ofstead C.L.
        • Wetzler H.P.
        • Heymann O.L.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal assessment of reprocessing effectiveness for colonoscopes and gastroscopes: results of visual inspections, biochemical markers, and microbial cultures.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: e26-e33
        • Perumpail R.B.
        • Marya N.B.
        • McGinty B.L.
        • et al.
        Endoscope reprocessing: comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 1083-1089
        • Gerding D.N.
        • Peterson L.R.
        • Vennes J.A.
        Cleaning and disinfection of fiberoptic endoscopes: evaluation of glutaraldehyde exposure time and forced-air drying.
        Gastroenterology. 1982; 83: 613-618
        • Saviuc P.
        • Picot-Guéraud R.
        • Sing J.S.C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the quality of reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 1017-1023
        • Ofstead C.L.
        • Wetzler H.P.
        • Johnson E.A.
        • et al.
        Simethicone residue remains inside gastrointestinal endoscopes despite reprocessing.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: 1237-1240
        • Ofstead C.L.
        • Heymann O.L.
        • Quick M.R.
        • et al.
        Residual moisture and waterborne pathogens inside flexible endoscopes: evidence from a multisite study of endoscope drying effectiveness.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 689-696
        • Thaker A.M.
        • Muthusamy V.R.
        • Sedarat A.
        • et al.
        Duodenoscope reprocessing practice patterns in U.S. endoscopy centers: a survey study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 316-322
        • Singh H.
        • Duerksen D.R.
        • Schultz G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of an overnight non-culture test for detection of viable Gram-negative bacteria in endoscope channels.
        Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7: E268-E273
        • Devereaux B.M.
        • Athan E.
        • Brown R.B.
        • et al.
        Australian infection control in endoscopy consensus statements on carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34: 650-658
        • Hall-Stoodley L.
        • Costerton J.W.
        • Stoodley P.
        Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.
        Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2: 95-108
        • Chobin N.
        Using instrument air in the decontamination area.
        Infection Control Today. 2017; (Available at:)
        • Pineau L.
        • De Philippe E.
        Evaluation of endoscope cleanliness after reprocessing: a clinical-use study [in German].
        Zentralsterilisation. 2013; 21 ([in German]): 22-27
        • Saliou P.
        • Cholet F.
        • Jezequel J.
        • et al.
        The use of channel-purge storage for gastrointestinal endoscopes reduces microbial contamination.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 1100-1102
        • Kutyla M.
        • O’Connor S.
        • Gurusamy S.
        • et al.
        influence of simethicone added to the rinse water during colonoscopies on polyp detection rates: results of an unintended cohort study.
        Digestion. 2018; 98: 217-221
        • Ofstead C.L.
        • Hopkins K.M.
        • Eiland J.E.
        • et al.
        Widespread clinical use of simethicone, insoluble lubricants, and tissue glue during endoscopy: a call to action for infection preventionists.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 666-670
        • Monrroy H.
        • Vargas J.I.
        • Glasinovic E.
        • et al.
        Use of N-acetylcysteine plus simethicone to improve mucosal visibility during upper GI endoscopy: a double blind, randomized, controlled study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 986-993
        • Liu X.
        • Guan C.T.
        • He S.
        • et al.
        Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study.
        Surg Endosc. 2018; 88: 3548-3556
      5. ECRI Alert A31187: Olympus—Flexible endoscopes: manufacturer recommends against use of simethicone/non-water soluble additives. 2018.
        (Available at:)
        www.ecri.org
        Date accessed: March 19, 2019
        • Benmassaoud A.
        • Parent J.
        CAG Position Statement: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Position Statement on the Impact of Simethicone on Endoscope Reprocessing.
        J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018; 1: 40-42
        • Bridier A.
        • del Pilar Sanchez-Vizuete M.
        • Le Coq D.
        • et al.
        Biofilms of a Bacillus subtilis hospital isolate protect Staphylococcus aureus from biocide action.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7e44506
        • Alfa M.J.
        • Ribeiro M.M.
        • da Costa Luciano C.
        • et al.
        A novel polytetrafluoroethylene-channel model, which simulates low levels of culturable bacteria in buildup biofilm after repeated endoscope reprocessing.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 86: 442-451
        • Zhong W.
        • Alfa M.
        • Howie R.
        • et al.
        Simulation of cyclic reprocessing buildup on reused medical devices.
        Comput Biol Med. 2009; 39: 568-577
      6. Alfa M, Labib M, Sohn S, et al. Buildup biofilm model: Stringent assessment for validation of cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels using novel NanoClean technology. Presented at the Kilmer conference, Dublin, Ireland, February 8, 2019. Available at: https://sfsap.org/kilmer. Accessed October 30, 2019.

        • Snyder G.M.
        • Wright S.B.
        • Smithey A.
        • et al.
        Randomized comparison of 3 high-level disinfection and sterilization procedures for duodenoscopes.
        Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 1018-1025
        • Rauwers A.W.
        • Voor In ’t holt A.F.
        • Buijs J.G.
        • et al.
        High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study.
        Gut. 2018; 67: 1637-1645
        • Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control, American Society for Microbiology
        Duodenoscope surveillance sampling & culturing. Reducing the risks of infection. 2018.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.fda.gov/media/111081/download
        Date accessed: October 30, 2019
        • Brandabur J.J.
        • Leggett J.E.
        • Wang L.
        • et al.
        Surveillance of guideline practices for duodenoscope and linear echoendoscope reprocessing in a large healthcare system.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 392-399.e3
        • Rutala W.A.
        • Webber D.J.
        Outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections associated with duodenoscopes: what can we do to prevent infections?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: e47-e51
        • Naryzhny I.
        • Silas D.
        • Chi K.
        Impact of ethylene oxide gas sterilization of duodenoscopes after a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae outbreak.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 259-262
        • Centers for Disease Control Advisory
        Immediate need to review procedures for cleaning, disinfecting and sterilizing reusable devices.
        Infection Control Today. 2015; (Available at:)
        • Centers for Disease Control
        Essential elements of a reprocessing program for flexible endoscopes – recommendations of the HICPAC. 2017.
        (Available at:)
        • Alfa M.J.
        • Fatima I.
        • Olson N.
        The ATP test is a rapid and reliable audit tool to assess manual cleaning adequacy of flexible endoscope channels.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 249-253
        • Calderwood A.H.
        • Lukejohn W.D.
        • Muthusamy R.
        • et al.
        Infection control during GI Endoscopy. Quality Assurance Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1167-1179