Advertisement

Evaluation of a robotic arm-assisted endoscope to facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)

Published:November 18, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.014

      Background and Aims

      Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered technically difficult and challenging using a conventional flexible endoscope, mainly due to the lack of proper countertraction to expose the submucosal dissection plane. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a traction method using a dexterous robotic arm in ex vivo gastric ESD.

      Methods

      ESD was performed in a total of 45 procedures using a portable endoscopic tool handler (PETH) (n = 30) and using the conventional method (n = 15) at various locations in the stomach. For each procedure, the performance data were recorded, including the total procedure time (minutes), incision time (minutes), dissection speed (mm2/minute), and blind dissection rate (%), to enable a comparison of the 2 ESD methods.

      Results

      The total procedure time was significantly shorter with PETH-ESD than in conventional ESD (23 vs 36 minutes, P = .011). This result is mainly attributed to the dissection speed, which was significantly faster, by more than 2.5 times, using the PETH (122.3 ± 76.5 vs 47.5 ± 26.9 mm2/minute, P < .001). The blind dissection rate was greatly decreased in PETH-ESD (0 vs 20%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the incision time (6.1 ± 5.0 vs 5.5 ± 2.9 min, P = .612).

      Conclusions

      The countertraction method using the PETH significantly improved the dissection speed and reduced blind dissection by enhancing direct visualization of the submucosal plane. With the advantages of multidirectional traction, fine tension control, and regrasping, this new device is expected to improve the performance of ESD and further facilitate advanced endoscopic procedures.

      Abbreviations:

      ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), PETH (portable endoscopic tool handler)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Liggi M.
        • Cadoni S.
        • Gallittu P.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic mucosal resection and hybrid techniques for large nonpedunculated colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
        Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 343-352
        • Park Y.-M.
        • Cho E.
        • Kang H.-Y.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 2666-2677
        • Sakamoto N.
        • Osada T.
        • Shibuya T.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 1370-1374
        • Li C.-H.
        • Chen P.-J.
        • Chu H.-C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection with the pulley method for early-stage gastric cancer (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 163-167
        • Imaeda H.
        • Hosoe N.
        • Ida Y.
        • et al.
        Novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection by using external forceps for early rectal cancer (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 1253-1257
        • Matsumoto K.
        • Nagahara A.
        • Ueyama H.
        • et al.
        Development and clinical usability of a new traction device “medical ring” for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 3444-3451
        • Teoh A.Y.B.
        • Chiu P.W.Y.
        • Hon S.F.
        • et al.
        Ex vivo comparative study using the Endolifter® as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during endoscopic submucosal dissection.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1422-1427
        • Suzuki S.
        • Gotoda T.
        • Kobayashi Y.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of a traction method using dental floss and a hemoclip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score matching analysis (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 337-346
        • Matsuzaki I.
        • Hattori M.
        • Hirose K.
        • et al.
        Magnetic anchor–guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1576-1580
        • Yoshida M.
        • Takizawa K.
        • Suzuki S.
        • et al.
        Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1231-1240
        • Phillip S.G.
        • Thompson C.C.
        • Jirapinyo P.
        • et al.
        Suture pulley countertraction method reduces procedure time and technical demand of endoscopic submucosal dissection among novice endoscopists learning endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective randomized ex vivo study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 177-184
        • Fuchs K.-H.
        • Breithaupt W.J.
        Transgastric small bowel resection with the new multitasking platform EndoSAMURAI™ for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 26: 2281-2287
        • Thompson C.C.
        • Ryou M.
        • Soper N.J.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 121-125
        • Diana M.
        • Chung H.
        • Liu K.-H.
        • et al.
        Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model.
        Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 4130-4135
        • Swanstrom L.L.
        • Kozarek R.
        • Pasricha P.J.
        • et al.
        Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 9: 1129-1137
        • Légner A.
        • Diana M.
        • Halvax P.
        • et al.
        Endoluminal surgical triangulation 2.0: a new flexible surgical robot. Preliminary pre-clinical results with colonic submucosal dissection.
        Int J Med Robot. 2017; 13e1819
        • Chiu P.W.Y.
        • Phee S.J.
        • Wang Z.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by overstitch: a preclinical study.
        Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 319-324
      1. Vrielink TJO, Zhao M, Darzi A, et al. ESD CYCLOPS: a new robotic surgical system for GI surgery. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), p. 150-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8462698.

        • Wang T.E.
        • Wang H.Y.
        • Lin C.C.
        • et al.
        Simulating a target lesion for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in an ex vivo pig model.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 398-402
        • Horii J.
        • Goto O.
        • Shimoda M.
        • et al.
        Which part of a porcine stomach is suitable as an animal training model for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?.
        Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 188-193