Advertisement
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Advanced SearchSave search
Original article Clinical endoscopy| Volume 93, ISSUE 4, P880-887.e1, April 01, 2021

Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation by manual versus self-sizing circumferential balloon catheters for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus: a multicenter comparative cohort study

Published:July 30, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.056
Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation by manual versus self-sizing circumferential balloon catheters for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus: a multicenter comparative cohort study
Previous ArticleProspective development and validation of a volumetric laser endomicroscopy computer algorithm for detection of Barrett’s neoplasia
Next ArticleSalvage endoscopic resection after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a Western experience

      Background and Aims

      Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred ablative modality for treating dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. The recently introduced self-sizing circumferential ablation catheter eliminates the need for a sizing balloon. Although it enhances efficiency, outcomes have not been compared with the previous manual-sizing catheter. We evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of these 2 ablation systems in a large, multicenter cohort.

      Methods

      Patients undergoing RFA at 3 tertiary care centers from 2005 to 2018 were included. Circumferential RFA was performed in a standard fashion, followed by focal RFA as needed. Outcomes were compared between the self-sizing and manual-sizing groups. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events, including strictures, perforation, and bleeding. Secondary outcomes were procedure time and treatment efficacy, as assessed by rates and time to complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM).

      Results

      Three hundred eighteen patients were included, 90 (28.3%) treated with the self-sizing catheter and 228 (71.7%) with the manual-sizing catheter. Twenty-one patients (6.6%) developed strictures (8 [8.9%] in the self-sizing group and 13 [5.7%] in the manual-sizing group, P = .32). Of the self-sizing strictures, 75% occurred at the 12J dose before widespread adoption of the current 10J treatment standard. One patient developed bleeding, and no perforations were encountered. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the self-sizing group. No significant differences were observed in rates of and time to CE-D and CE-IM.

      Conclusions

      These findings suggest that both systems are comparable in safety and efficacy. The use of the self-sizing system may enhance the efficiency of RFA for treating dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

      Abbreviations:

      BE (Barrett’s esophagus), CE-D (complete eradication of dysplasia), CE-IM (complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia), cRFA (circumferential radiofrequency ablation), RFA (radiofrequency ablation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shaheen N.J.
        • Sharma P.
        • Overholt B.F.
        • et al.
        Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2277-2288
        View in Article
        • Fleischer D.E.
        • Overholt B.F.
        • Sharma V.K.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: 5-year outcomes from a prospective multicenter trial.
        Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 781-789
        View in Article
        • Shaheen N.J.
        • Overholt B.F.
        • Sampliner R.E.
        • et al.
        Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia.
        Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 460-468
        View in Article
        • Shaheen N.J.
        • Falk G.W.
        • Iyer P.G.
        • et al.
        ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 30-50
        View in Article
        • Weusten B.
        • Bisschops R.
        • Coron E.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 191-198
        View in Article
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Sharma V.K.
        • Bergman J.J.
        • et al.
        Radiofrequency ablation for total Barrett's eradication: a description of the endoscopic technique, its clinical results and future prospects.
        Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 1033-1040
        View in Article
        • Dunkin B.J.
        • Martinez J.
        • Bejarano P.A.
        • et al.
        Thin-layer ablation of human esophageal epithelium using a bipolar radiofrequency balloon device.
        Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 125-130
        View in Article
        • Belghazi K.
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Sondermeijer C.
        • et al.
        A single-step sizing and radiofrequency ablation catheter for circumferential ablation of Barrett's esophagus: results of a pilot study.
        United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018; 6: 990-999
        View in Article
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Bergman J.J.
        Safety signal for the simple double ablation regimen when using the Barrx 360 Express radiofrequency ablation balloon catheter.
        Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 614
        View in Article
        • Belghazi K.
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Koch A.D.
        • et al.
        Self-sizing radiofrequency ablation balloon for eradication of Barrett's esophagus: results of an international multicenter randomized trial comparing 3 different treatment regimens.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90: 415-423
        View in Article
        • Qumseya B.J.
        • Wani S.
        • Desai M.
        • et al.
        Adverse events after radiofrequency ablation in patients with barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 1086-1095
        View in Article
        • Okoro N.I.
        • Tomizawa Y.
        • Dunagan K.T.
        • et al.
        Safety of prior endoscopic mucosal resection in patients receiving radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10: 150-154
        View in Article
        • Phoa K.N.
        • Pouw R.E.
        • Bisschops R.
        • et al.
        Multimodality endoscopic eradication for neoplastic Barrett oesophagus: results of an European multicentre study (EURO-II).
        Gut. 2016; 65: 555-562
        View in Article
        • Acosta R.D.
        • Abraham N.S.
        • Chandrasekhara V.
        • et al.
        The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 3-16
        View in Article
        • Desai M.
        • Saligram S.
        • Gupta N.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety outcomes of multimodal endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 482-495
        View in Article
        • Guthikonda A.
        • Cotton C.C.
        • Madanick R.D.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes following recurrence of intestinal metaplasia after successful treatment of Barrett's esophagus with radiofrequency ablation.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 87-94
        View in Article
        • Haidry R.J.
        • Dunn J.M.
        • Butt M.A.
        • et al.
        Radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection for dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: outcomes of the UK National Halo RFA Registry.
        Gastroenterology. 2013; 145: 87-95
        View in Article
        • Phoa K.N.
        • Pouw R.E.
        • van Vilsteren F.G.I.
        • et al.
        Remission of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study.
        Gastroenterology. 2013; 145: 96-104
        View in Article
        • Gupta M.
        • Iyer P.G.
        • Lutzke L.
        • et al.
        Recurrence of esophageal intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus: results from a US Multicenter Consortium.
        Gastroenterology. 2013; 145: 79-86
        View in Article
        • Kahn A.
        • Al-Qaisi M.
        • Kommineni V.T.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal outcomes of radiofrequency ablation versus surveillance endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia.
        Dis Esophagus. 2017; 31: 1-8
        View in Article
        • Sami S.S.
        • Ravindran A.
        • Kahn A.
        • et al.
        Timeline and location of recurrence following successful ablation in Barrett's oesophagus: an international multicentre study.
        Gut. 2019; 68: 1379-1385
        View in Article
        • Sawas T.
        • Iyer P.G.
        • Alsawas M.
        • et al.
        Higher rate of Barrett's detection in the first year after successful endoscopic therapy: meta-analysis.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 959-971
        View in Article
        • Hur C.
        • Miller M.
        • Kong C.Y.
        • et al.
        Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality.
        Cancer. 2013; 119: 1149-1158
        View in Article
        • van Soest E.M.
        • Dieleman J.P.
        • Siersema P.D.
        • et al.
        Increasing incidence of Barrett's oesophagus in the general population.
        Gut. 2005; 54: 1062-1066
        View in Article

      Article Info

      Publication History

      Published online: July 30, 2020
      Accepted: July 26, 2020
      Received: January 9, 2020

      Footnotes

      DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: A. Kahn, C. L. Leggett, F.C. Ramirez: Research support from NinePoint Medical. M. B. Wallace: Consultant for Virgo Inc, Cosmo/Aries Pharmaceuticals, Anx Robotica (2019), Covidien, GI Supply, Endokey, Endostart, and Boston Scientific; research support from Fujifilm, Boston Scientific, Olympus, Medtronic, Ninepoint Medical, and Cosmo/Aries Pharmaceuticals; stock or stock options from Virgo Inc; general support from Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, and Cook Medical. K. K. Wang: Research support from Erbe, EndoRotor, and Fujifilm. P. G. Iyer: Research support from Exact Sciences, C2 Therapeutics, and Intromedic Inc; consultant for Medtronic, Symple Surgical, and CSA Medical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.

      If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Iyer at [email protected]

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.056

      Copyright

      © 2021 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX