Advertisement

Gender dynamics in education and practice of gastroenterology

Published:August 25, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.08.022

      Background and Aims

      With an increasing number of women joining procedural fields, including gastroenterology, optimizing the work environment for learning, teaching, and clinical practice is essential to the well-being of both physicians and their patients. We queried female and male gastroenterologists on their beliefs toward the endoscopy suite environment, as well as their experiences in learning and teaching endoscopic skills.

      Methods

      We distributed a web-based survey to 403 gastroenterology fellows and practicing gastroenterologists at 12 academic institutions and 3 large private practices. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to compare the responses of female and male gastroenterologists.

      Results

      The overall response rate was 32% (n = 130); 54 women and 61 men completed the survey in its entirety and were included in the analysis (15 respondents did not meet the inclusion criteria). Baseline demographics were comparable between the groups. Overall, fewer women than men were trained using tactile instruction (41% vs 67%; P = .004). Of those trained using tactile instruction, 60.3%, with no gender differences, felt it was also important for endoscopic learning. More women reported experiencing gender bias toward themselves during training (57.4% vs 13.1%; P = .001) as well as in their current careers (50.0% vs 9.8%; P = .001). When queried on treatment of gastroenterologists by endoscopy staff, 75.9% of women reported that men were treated more favorably, whereas 70.5% of men felt that both male and female gastroenterologists were treated equally.

      Conclusions

      Inequities exist with regard to the experience of men and women in gastroenterology, and specific challenges for women may have an impact on their career choices and ability to safely and effectively learn, teach, and practice endoscopy.

      Graphical abstract

      Abbreviation:

      SD (standard deviation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Table B-3: Total U.S. Medical School Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Sex, 2014-2015 through 2018-2019.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2020)
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Active physicians by sex and specialty.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2020)
        • Parks A.L.
        • Redberg R.F.
        Women in medicine and patient outcomes: equal rights for better work?.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 161
        • Rotenstein L.S.
        • Berman R.A.
        • Katz J.T.
        • et al.
        Making the voices of female trainees heard.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 339-340
        • Giner R.
        • Spanish Hepatologist Women Group
        Spanish women hepatologists: breaking the glass ceiling?.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 622-623
        • Friedman S.
        DDS perspective: reflections of a woman in gastroenterology.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 64: 2706-2708
        • Asgari M.M.
        • Carr P.L.
        • Bates C.K.
        Closing the gender wage gap and achieving professional equity in medicine.
        JAMA. 2019; 321: 1665-1666
        • Diamond S.J.
        • Thomas Jr., C.R.
        • Desai S.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in publication productivity, academic rank, and career duration among U.S. academic gastroenterology faculty.
        Acad Med. 2016; 91: 1158-1163
        • Tomer G.
        • Xanthakos S.
        • Kim S.
        • et al.
        Perceptions of gender equality in work-life balance, salary, promotion, and harassment: results of the NASPGHAN task force survey.
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015; 60: 481-485
        • Rabinowitz L.G.
        • Anandasabapathy S.
        • Sethi A.
        • et al.
        Addressing gender in gastroenterology: opportunities for change.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 155-161
        • Fitzgerald C.A.
        • Smith R.N.
        • Luo-Owen X.
        • et al.
        Screening for harassment, abuse, and discrimination among surgery residents: an EAST multicenter trial.
        Am Surg. 2019; 85: 456-461
        • Pololi L.H.C.J.
        • Brennan R.T.
        • Dottolo A.L.
        • et al.
        experiencing the culture of academic medicine: gender matters, a national study.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 201-207
        • Nayyar A.
        • Scarlet S.
        • Strassle P.D.
        • et al.
        A national survey of sexual harassment among surgeons.
        Academic Surgical Congress, 2019 (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2020)
        • Sharma M.
        Applying feminist theory to medical education.
        Lancet. 2019; 393: 570-578
        • Chong V.H.
        Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18: 3590-3594
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Petruff C.
        • Ramsey W.H.
        Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: 170-173
        • Menees S.B.
        • Inadomi J.M.
        • Korsnes S.
        • et al.
        Women patients' preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62: 219-223
        • Shah D.K.
        • Karasek V.
        • Gerkin R.D.
        • et al.
        Sex preferences for colonoscopists and GI physicians among patients and health care professionals.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 122-127 e2
        • Wallis C.J.
        • Ravi B.
        • Coburn N.
        • et al.
        Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study.
        BMJ. 2017; 359: j4366
        • Greenwood B.N.
        • Carnahan S.
        • Huang L.
        Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115: 8569
        • Tsugawa Y.
        • Jena A.B.
        • Figueroa J.F.
        • et al.
        Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 206-213
        • Carr P.L.
        • Raj A.
        • Kaplan S.E.
        • et al.
        Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey.
        Acad Med. 2018; 93: 1694-1699
        • Cambridge University Press
        Cambridge dictionary.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2020
      1. Rabinowitz LG, Grinspan LT, Kim MK. Gender in the endoscopy suite. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. Epub 2020;5:132-4.

      2. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 49: 845-853
        • United States Agency for International Development
        Glossary of gender terms and concepts.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2020)
        • Waschke K.A.
        • Anderson J.
        • Macintosh D.
        • et al.
        Training the gastrointestinal endoscopy trainer.
        Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 30: 409-419
        • Harvin G.
        Review of musculoskeletal injuries and prevention in the endoscopy practitioner.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 48: 590-594
        • AlSabah S.
        • Al Haddad E.
        • Khwaja H.
        The prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries in bariatric surgeons.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 1818-1827
        • Adams D.M.
        • Fenton S.J.
        • Schirmer B.D.
        • et al.
        One size does not fit all: current disposable laparoscopic devices do not fit the needs of female laparoscopic surgeons.
        Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 2310-2313
        • Cohen D.L.
        • Naik J.R.
        • Tamariz L.J.
        • et al.
        The perception of gastroenterology fellows towards the relationship between hand size and endoscopic training.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2008; 53: 1902-1909
        • Woodward Z.J.
        • Rodriguez Z.
        • Degnin C.R.
        • et al.
        Gender disparities in fourth year gastroenterology fellowship program leadership in the United States [abstract].
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: AB269
        • Tringale K.R.
        • Marshall D.
        • Mackey T.K.
        • et al.
        Types and distribution of payments from industry to physicians in 2015.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 1774-1784
        • Tringale K.R.
        • Hattangadi-Gluth J.A.
        Types and distributions of biomedical industry payments to men and women physicians by specialty, 2015.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 421-423
        • Rabinowitz L.G.
        Recognizing blind spots - a remedy for gender bias in medicine?.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 2253-2255
        • Cahn P.S.
        Recognizing and reckoning with unconscious bias: a workshop for health professions faculty search committees.
        MedEdPORTAL. 2017; 13: 10544
        • Girod S.
        • Fassiotto M.
        • Grewal D.
        • et al.
        Reducing implicit gender leadership bias in academic medicine with an educational intervention.
        Acad Med. 2016; 91: 1143-1150
        • Brucker K.
        • Whitaker N.
        • Morgan Z.S.
        • et al.
        Exploring gender bias in nursing evaluations of emergency medicine residents.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2019; 26: 1266-1272
        • Kuhlmann E.
        • Ovseiko P.V.
        • Kurmeyer C.
        • et al.
        Closing the gender leadership gap: a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership in academic health centres in the European Union.
        Hum Resour Health. 2017; 15: 2
        • Enestvedt B.K.
        • DeVivo R.S.
        • Schmitt C.M.
        • et al.
        Increase in female faculty in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-sponsored programming over time.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 952-955

      Linked Article

      • Don’t fix the women, fix the system: recognizing and addressing implicit gender bias in gastroenterology training and practice
        Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 93Issue 5
        • Preview
          Amidst the collective national reckoning on sexual harassment, assault, and discrimination inspired by the #MeToo and #Times Up movements, there has been increased scrutiny of the role of unconscious bias, gendered societal expectations, and harassment in creating and perpetuating gender inequity in medicine. Strikingly, in one of the first surveys exploring gender harassment at a major academic medical center, >92% of female physicians and faculty reported having experienced gender harassment (including feeling mistreated, slighted, or ignored because of their gender, being the recipient of sexist remarks, or being put down or treated with condescension because of their gender) during their training or practice.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF