Advertisement

Evaluating learning curves and competence in colorectal EMR among advanced endoscopy fellows: a pilot multicenter prospective trial using cumulative sum analysis

Published:September 19, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.023

      Background and Aims

      Data on colorectal EMR (C-EMR) training are lacking. We aimed to evaluate C-EMR training among advanced endoscopy fellows (AEFs) by using a standardized assessment tool (STAT).

      Methods

      This multicenter prospective study used a STAT to grade AEF training in C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. Cumulative sum analysis was used to establish learning curves and competence for cognitive and technical components of C-EMR and overall performance. Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying failure rates. AEFs completed a self-assessment questionnaire to assess their comfort level with performing C-EMR at the completion of their fellowship.

      Results

      Six AEFs (189 C-EMRs; mean per AEF, 31.5 ± 18.5) were included. Mean polyp size was 24.3 ± 12.6 mm, and mean procedure time was 22.6 ± 16.1 minutes. Learning curve analyses revealed that less than 50% of AEFs achieved competence for key cognitive and technical C-EMR endpoints. All 6 AEFs reported feeling comfortable performing C-EMR independently at the end of their training, although only 2 of them achieved competence in their overall performance. The minimum threshold to achieve competence in these 2 AEFs was 25 C-EMRs.

      Conclusions

      A relatively low proportion of AEFs achieved competence on key cognitive and technical aspects of C-EMR during their 12-month fellowship. The relatively low number of C-EMRs performed by AEFs may be insufficient to achieve competence, in spite of their self-reported readiness for independent practice. These pilot data serve as an initial framework for competence threshold, and suggest the need for validated tools for formal C-EMR training assessment.

      Abbreviations:

      AEF (advanced endoscopy fellow), ASGE (American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), C-EMR (colorectal EMR), CUSUM (cumulative sum), EMR-STAT (EMR standardized assessment tool)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yang D.
        • Othman M.
        • Draganov P.V.
        Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett’s esophagus and colorectal neoplasia.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 1019-1028
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Bourke M.J.
        Selection of EMR and ESD for laterally spreading lesions of the colon.
        Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018; 16: 376-385
        • Jayanna M.
        • Burgess N.G.
        • Singh R.
        • et al.
        Cost analysis of laterally spreading colorectal lesions.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 271-278
        • Ma C.
        • Teriaky A.
        • Sheh S.
        • et al.
        Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps: a 10-year national analysis.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114: 1802-1810
        • Dang H.
        • de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel W.H.
        • van der Zwaan S.M.S.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic or surgical tumor resection.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 533-544
        • Ferlitsch
        • Moss A.
        • Hassan C.
        • et al.
        Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 270-297
        • Bhurwal A.
        • Bartel M.J.
        • Heckman M.G.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic mucosal resection: learning curve for large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 959-968
        • Rajendran A.
        • Pannick S.
        • Thomas-Gibson S.
        • et al.
        Systematic literature review of learning curves for colorectal polyp resection techniques in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Colorectal Dis. Epub 2020 Jan 11;
        • Yang D.
        • Wagh M.S.
        • Draganov P.V.
        The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 1016-1025
        • Faulx A.L.
        • Lightdale J.R.
        • Acosta R.D.
        • et al.
        Guideline for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 273-281
        • Wani S.
        • Keswani R.N.
        • Petersen B.
        • et al.
        Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1371-1382
        • Wani S.
        • Hall M.
        • Wang A.Y.
        • et al.
        Variation in learning curves and competence for ERCP among advanced endoscopy trainees by using cumulative sum analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 711-719
        • Wani S.
        • Keswani R.
        • Hall M.
        • et al.
        A prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among advanced endoscopy trainees: the rapid assessment of trainee endoscopy skills study.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15: 1758-1767
        • Wani S.
        • Keswani R.N.
        • Han S.
        • et al.
        Competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, from training through independent practice.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 1483-1494
        • Kaltenbach T.
        • Anderson J.C.
        • Burke C.A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions—recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 486-519
      1. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58: S3-S43
        • Kudo S.
        • Lamber R.
        • Allen J.I.
        • et al.
        Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68: S3-S47
        • Monkemuller K.
        • Neumann H.
        • Fry L.C.
        • et al.
        Polypectomy techniques for difficult colon polyps.
        Dig Dis. 2008; 26: 342-346
        • Pidala M.J.
        • Cusick M.V.
        The difficult colorectal polyp.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2017; 97: 515-527
        • Klein A.
        • Bourke M.J.
        How to perform high-quality endoscopic mucosal resection during colonoscopy.
        Gastroenterology. 2017; 152: 466-471
        • Nett A.
        • Binmoeller K.
        Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2019; 29: 659-673
        • Han S.
        • Obuch J.C.
        • Keswani R.N.
        • et al.
        Effect of individualized feedback on learning curves in EGD and colonoscopy: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 882-893
        • Lipman G.
        • Markar S.
        • Gupta A.
        • et al.
        Learning curves and the influence of procedural volume for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett’s.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 543-550
        • Bolsin S.
        • Colson M.
        The use of the cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2000; 12: 433-438
        • Rex D.K.
        • Shaukat A.
        • Wallace M.B.
        Optimal management of malignant polyps, from endoscopic assessment and resection to decisions about surgery.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 1428-1437
        • Castela J.
        • Mao de Ferro S.
        • Rosa I.
        • et al.
        Real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in the routine clinical practice using the NICE and WASP classifications in a nonacademic setting.
        GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019; 26: 314-323
        • Moon N.
        • Aryan M.
        • Khan W.
        • et al.
        Effect of referral pattern and histopathology grade on surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 702-711
        • Dilly C.K.
        • Sewell J.L.
        How to give feedback during endoscopy training.
        Gastroenterology. 2017; 153: 632-636
        • Thurasingam A.I.
        • MacDonald J.
        • Shaw I.S.
        Insights into endoscopy training: a qualitative study of learning experience.
        Med Teach. 2006; 27: 453-459
        • Gupta S.
        • Alladina J.
        • Heaton K.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of an intervention to improve resident-fellow teaching interactions on the wards.
        BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16: 276
        • Pimentel-Nunes P.
        • Pioche M.
        • Albeniz E.
        • et al.
        Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement.
        Endoscopy. 2019; 51: 980-992
        • Mahmood T.
        • Darzi A.
        The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.
        Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1224-1230
        • Choi J.M.
        • Lee C.
        • Park J.H.
        • et al.
        Complete resection of colorectal adenomas: what are the important factors in fellow training?.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60: 1579-1588

      Linked Article

      • Validated training tools are needed for assessing competency in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection
        Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 93Issue 3
        • Preview
          We read with great interest the study by Yang et al1 evaluating competency in the performance of colorectal EMR (C-EMR) among 6 advanced endoscopy fellows (AEFs). The competency outcome measured was defined by a novel EMR standardized assessment tool (EMR-STAT), and the study’s primary finding was that a small percentage of the studied trainees achieved competence in the technical and cognitive aspects of C-EMR. Given the lack of published studies on C-EMR training, we laud the authors for carrying out this study.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF