Advertisement

Evaluating the impact of frailty on periprocedural adverse events and mortality among patients with GI bleeding

Published:March 19, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.021

      Background and Aims

      Frailty is a known predictor of mortality and adverse events in the inpatient setting; however, it has not been studied as a modality to assess risk among patients undergoing endoscopy for GI bleeding (GIB). We aimed to determine the association between frailty status and risk of adverse events in hospitalized patients with GIB who underwent endoscopy.

      Methods

      We performed a cohort study using the 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample database, using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes to identify adult patients with GIB who underwent endoscopic procedures within 2 days of admission and the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to classify patients as frail or nonfrail. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the predictors of periprocedural adverse events, and marginal standardization analysis was performed to assess for possible interaction between age and frailty.

      Results

      A total of 757,920 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 44.4% (336,895) were identified as frail and 55.6% (421,025) as nonfrail; 49.2% of frail patients had composite periprocedural adverse events compared with 25.5% of nonfrail patients (P < .001). Frail patients notably had more cardiovascular (32.1% vs 17.1%, P < .001), pulmonary (18.5% vs 4.3%, P < .001), GI (10.1% vs 6.1%, P < .001), and infectious (9.9% vs .7%, P < .001) adverse events compared with nonfrail patients. Frail patients also had higher all-cause inpatient mortality rates (4.8% vs .5%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, positive frailty status was associated with a 2.13 times increased likelihood of having composite periprocedural adverse events.

      Conclusions

      In hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopy for GIB, frailty status is associated with increased periprocedural adverse events including all-cause mortality. The use of frailty assessments can thus further guide clinical decision-making when considering endoscopy and risk of adverse events in adult patients with GI hemorrhage.

      Abbreviations:

      CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index), GIB (GI bleeding), HFRS (Hospital Frailty Risk Score), ICD (International Classification of Diseases), LGIB (lower GI bleeding), NIS (National Inpatient Sample), aOR (adjusted odds ratio), OR (odds ratio), UGIB (upper GI bleeding)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peery A.F.
        • Crockett S.D.
        • Murphy C.C.
        • et al.
        Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: 254-272
        • Cho S.H.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Kim Y.J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes and role of urgent endoscopy in high-risk patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16: 370-377
        • Lieber S.R.
        • Heller B.J.
        • Howard C.W.
        • et al.
        Complications associated with anesthesia services in endoscopic procedures among patients with cirrhosis.
        Hepatology. 2020; 72: 2109-2118
        • Camus M.
        • Jensen D.M.
        • Ohning G.V.
        • et al.
        Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 50: 52-58
        • Blatchford O.
        • Murray W.R.
        • Blatchford M.
        A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 1318-1321
        • Charlson M.E.
        • Pompei P.
        • Ales K.L.
        • et al.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
        • Aoki T.
        • Nagata N.
        • Shimbo T.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a risk scoring system for severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 1562-1570
        • Shafaghi A.
        • Gharibpoor F.
        • Mahdipour Z.
        • et al.
        Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
        Roman J Intern Med. 2019; 57: 322-333
        • Tapaskar N.
        • Jones B.
        • Mei S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of clinical prediction tools and identification of risk factors for adverse outcomes in acute lower GI bleeding.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 1005-1013
        • Kosowicz R.L.
        • Strate L.L.
        Predicting outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: more work ahead.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 1014-1016
        • Clegg A.
        • Young J.
        • Iliffe S.
        • et al.
        Frailty in elderly people.
        Lancet. 2013; 381: 752-762
        • Mosquera C.
        • Spaniolas K.
        • Fitzgerald T.L.
        Impact of frailty on surgical outcomes: the right patient for the right procedure.
        Surgery. 2016; 160: 272-280
        • Kim D.H.
        • Kim C.A.
        • Placide S.
        • et al.
        Preoperative frailty assessment and outcomes at 6 months or later in older adults undergoing cardiac surgical procedures: a systematic review.
        Ann Intern Med. 2016; 165: 650-660
        • Murali-Krishnan R.
        • Iqbal J.
        • Rowe R.
        • et al.
        Impact of frailty on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.
        Open Heart. 2015; 2: e000294
        • Al Abbas A.I.
        • Borrebach J.D.
        • Pitt H.A.
        • et al.
        Development of a novel pancreatoduodenectomy-specific risk calculator: an analysis of 10,000 patients.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; (Epub 2020 Jul 15)
        • Robinson T.N.
        • Walston J.D.
        • Brummel N.E.
        • et al.
        Frailty for surgeons: review of a National Institute on Aging conference on frailty for specialists.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221: 1083-1092
        • Walston J.
        • Robinson T.N.
        • Zieman S.
        • et al.
        Integrating frailty research into the medical specialties—report from a U13 conference.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65: 2134-2139
        • Taleban S.
        • Toosizadeh N.
        • Junna S.
        • et al.
        Frailty assessment predicts acute outcomes in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 63: 3272-3280
        • Toosizadeh N.
        • Mohler J.
        • Najafi B.
        Assessing upper extremity motion: an innovative method to identify frailty.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63: 1181-1186
        • Fried L.P.
        • Tangen C.M.
        • Walston J.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.
        J Gerontol Ser A. 2001; 56: M146-M157
        • Woo J.
        • Yu R.
        • Wong M.
        • et al.
        Frailty screening in the community using the FRAIL scale.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16: 412-419
        • Gilbert T.
        • Neuburger J.
        • Kraindler J.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 1775-1782
        • Kwok C.S.
        • Achenbach S.
        • Curzen N.
        • et al.
        Relation of frailty to outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019; 21: 811-818
        • Hannah T.C.
        • Neifert S.N.
        • Caridi J.M.
        • et al.
        Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score for predicting adverse outcomes in degenerative spine surgery cohorts.
        Neurosurgery. 2020; 87: 1223-1230
        • Smith R.J.
        • Reid D.A.
        • Santamaria J.D.
        Frailty is associated with reduced prospect of discharge home after in-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Intern Med J. 2019; 49: 978-985
        • Kochar B.
        • Cai W.
        • Cagan A.
        • et al.
        Pre-treatment frailty is independently associated with increased risk of infections after immunosuppression in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
        Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 2104-2111
        • Kochar B.
        • Cai W.
        • Cagan A.
        • et al.
        Frailty is independently associated with mortality in 11 001 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
        Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2020; 52: 311-318
      1. HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). 2012 [dataset]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.

        • Abougergi M.S.
        • Travis A.C.
        • Saltzman J.R.
        Impact of day of admission on mortality and other outcomes in upper GI hemorrhage: a nationwide analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 228-235
        • Strate L.L.
        • Ayanian J.Z.
        • Kotler G.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for mortality in lower intestinal bleeding.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6 (1004-10)
        • Navaneethan U.
        • Njei B.
        • Venkatesh P.G.K.
        • et al.
        Timing of colonoscopy and outcomes in patients with lower GI bleeding: a nationwide population-based study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79: 297-306
        • Glasheen W.P.
        • Cordier T.
        • Gumpina R.
        • et al.
        Charlson Comorbidity Index: ICD-9 update and ICD-10 translation.
        Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019; 12: 188-197
        • Eckart A.
        • Hauser S.I.
        • Haubitz S.
        • et al.
        Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland: results of a prospective, observational study.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e026923
        • McAlister F.
        • van Walraven C.
        External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score and comparison with the hospital-patient one-year mortality risk score to predict outcomes in elderly hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28: 284
        • Negrón M.E.
        • Rezaie A.
        • Barkema H.W.
        • et al.
        Ulcerative colitis patients with Clostridium difficile are at increased risk of death, colectomy, and postoperative complications: a population-based inception cohort study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 691-704
        • Khan N.A.
        • Quan H.
        • Bugar J.M.
        • et al.
        Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 177-180
        • StataCorp
        Stata statistical software: release 16.
        StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX2019
        • Oakland K.
        Changing epidemiology and etiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
        Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019; 42-43: 101610
        • Pannach S.
        • Goetze J.
        • Marten S.
        • et al.
        Management and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs.
        J Gastroenterol. 2017; 52: 1211-1220
        • Bandeen-Roche K.
        • Seplaki C.L.
        • Huang J.
        • et al.
        Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States.
        J Gerontol Ser A. 2015; 70: 1427-1434
        • Richards S.J.G.
        • D'Souza J.
        • Pascoe R.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: a point prevalence observational study.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14e0219083
        • Saltzman J.R.
        • Tabak Y.P.
        • Hyett B.H.
        • et al.
        A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 1215-1224
        • Oakland K.
        • Jairath V.
        • Uberoi R.
        • et al.
        Derivation and validation of a novel risk score for safe discharge after acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a modelling study.
        Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2: 635-643
        • Strate L.L.
        • Orav E.J.
        • Syngal S.
        Early predictors of severity in acute lower intestinal tract bleeding.
        Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 838-843
        • Cooper G.S.
        • Chak A.
        • Lloyd L.E.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of diagnosis and procedural codes for patients with upper GI hemorrhage.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 423-426
        • Lanas A.
        • García-Rodríguez L.A.
        • Polo-Tomás M.
        • et al.
        The changing face of hospitalisation due to gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation.
        Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2011; 33: 585-591
        • Shah S.
        • Goldberg D.S.
        • Kaplan D.E.
        • et al.
        Patient frailty is independently associated with the risk of hospitalization for acute-on-chronic liver failure.
        Liver Transplant. 2021; 27: 16-26
        • Lau J.Y.W.
        • Yu Y.
        • Tang R.S.Y.
        • et al.
        Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1299-1308
        • Desai J.
        • Shah Y.
        • Patel K.
        • et al.
        Nationwide analysis of resource utilization and in-hospital outcomes in the obese patients with lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 54: 249-254