Background and Aims
Abbreviations:ADR (adenoma detection rate), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists), GIQuIC (GI Quality Improvement Consortium), USMSTF (U.S. Multi-Society Task Force)
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 378-384
- Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58: 76-79
- Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 781-794
- Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 1131-1153
- Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 543-562
- Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology. 2012; 143: 844-857
- The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 2680-2685
- Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28: 73-81
- The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations.Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 2058-2062
- Yield and practice patterns of surveillance colonoscopy among older adults: an analysis of the GI Quality Improvement Consortium.Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114: 1811-1819
- U.S. Census Regions.(Available at:)https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdfDate accessed: July 15, 2020
- Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58: 2151-2155
- Impact of colonoscopy bowel preparation quality on follow-up interval recommendations for average-risk patients with normal screening colonoscopies: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 54: 356-364
- Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.Gastroenterology. 2006; 130: 1872-1885
- Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.Gastroenterology. 2003; 124: 544-560
- Endoscopist specialty predicts the likelihood of recommending cessation of colorectal cancer screening in older adults.Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1862-1871
- Factors associated with shorter colonoscopy surveillance intervals for patients with low-risk colorectal adenomas and effects on outcome.Gastroenterology. 2017; 152: 1933-1943
- Underuse and overuse of colonoscopy for repeat screening and surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 436-444
- Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 264-271
- The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73: 1207-1214
- Physician non-adherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.Gastroenterology. 2015; 149: 938-951
- The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 620-625
- Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing.Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 2667
- What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109 (quiz 1724): 1714-1723
DISCLOSURE: The following author received research support for this study from the National Cancer Institute (R21 CA227776), The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Cancer Research Fellows Program, the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (5P30CA023108) to the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, and The Dartmouth Clinical and Translational Science Institute (award no. UL1TR001086) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health: A. H. Calderwood. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
See CME section, p. 372.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Calderwood at [email protected]