Background and Aims
Abbreviations:ADR (adenoma detection rate), CRC (colorectal cancer), CSSDR (clinically significant serrated polyp detection rate), CSSP (clinically significant serrated polyp), HP (hyperplastic polyp), HR (hazard ratio), NHCR (New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry), PCCRC (postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer), SSP (sessile serrated polyp), TSA (traditional serrated adenomas)
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1298-1306
- Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1795-1803
- Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.BMC Cancer. 2018; 18: 465
- Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 1296-1308
- Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63: S16-S28
- Colorectal cancer screening for the serrated pathway.Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2020; 30: 457-478
- Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps.Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 852-861.e4
- Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps.Gut. 2015; 64: 929-936
Pai RK, Mäkinen MJ, Rosty C. Colorectal serrated lesions and polyps. In: Nagtegaal ID, Arends MJ, Odze RD, Lam AK (eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: ARC Press; 2019. p. 163-169.
- Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 617-623
- The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 870-877
- Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9: 42-46
- High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75: 515-520
- Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12: 1119-1126
- Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 1188-1194
- AGA clinical practice update on strategies to improve quality of screening and surveillance colonoscopy: expert review.Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 701-711
- Factors associated with classification of hyperplastic polyps as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps on morphologic review.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018; 52: 524-529
- Interobserver agreement among pathologists in the differentiation of sessile serrated from hyperplastic polyps.Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 452-454
- A polyp worth removing: a paradigm for measuring colonoscopy quality and performance of novel technologies for polyp detection.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021; 55: 733-739
- Increased risk of metachronous large serrated polyps in individuals with 5- to 9-mm proximal hyperplastic polyps: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 387-393
- Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 334-340
- Association between improved adenoma detection rates and interval colorectal cancer rates after a quality improvement program.Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 355-364
- World Endoscopy Organization consensus statements on post-colonoscopy and post-imaging colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology. 2018; 155: 909-925
- Circumstances in which colonoscopy misses cancer.Frontline Gastroenterol. 2010; 1: 52-58
- Colonoscopist performance and colorectal cancer risk after adenoma removal to stratify surveillance: two nationwide observational studies.Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 1067-1074
- Serrated polyp detection by the fecal immunochemical test: an imperfect FIT.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15: 880-882
- Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 417-426
- Withdrawal time: Is nine the new six?.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 20: e22-e24
- Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107 (quiz 1314, 1330): 1315-1329
- Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study.Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 984-992
- Detection of clinically relevant serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy: results from seven cooperating centers within the German colorectal screening program.Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 993-1000
- Significant variation in the detection rates of proximal serrated polyps among academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons in a single tertiary care center.Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 64: 2614-2621
- Detection of serrated polyps: How do endoscopists rate?.Endoscopy. 2018; 50: 950-952
- Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9: E610-E620
- Increased risk of colorectal cancer development among patients with serrated polyps.Gastroenterology. 2016; 150: 895-902
- Impact of colonoscopy bowel preparation quality on follow-up interval recommendations for average-risk patients with normal screening colonoscopies: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 54: 356-364
- Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80: 463-470
- Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on World Endoscopy Organization system of analysis.Gastroenterology. 2020; 158: 1287-1299
- Clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics of interval colorectal carcinomas favor origin from missed or incompletely excised precursors.Mod Pathol. 2019; 32: 666-674
DISCLOSURE: Dr Meester received financial support from the National Institutes of Health. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
See CME section, p. 373.
SEAM funding was received from the Department of Medicine at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center. The contents of this work do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Anderson at [email protected] .