Before you implement a new technique or technology in your unit: a strategic perspective of endoscopy

Published:August 03, 2022DOI:
      Endoscopy has evolved rapidly in the past decades because of significant increases in the number of endoscopy units, development of specific tools and accessories, ease of access (eg, open-access endoscopy), and high-quality prospective data showing good long-term patient-oriented outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility. Concomitantly, leaders of the scientific community have continuously pushed the envelope and expanded the indications and possibilities of digestive endoscopy. Where therapy is concerned, the development of innovative techniques is driven by a superior risk-to-benefit profile when compared with the more invasive classic approaches (eg, surgery). For a new technique to be widely adopted, it needs to fulfill certain criteria, such as time-tested proof of desirable outcome, availability of instruments, and stakeholder endorsement.


      ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Pimentel-Nunes P.
        • Pioche M.
        • Albéniz E.
        • et al.
        Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement.
        Endoscopy. 2019; 51: 980-992
        • Draganov P.V.
        • Wang A.Y.
        • Othman M.O.
        • et al.
        AGA Institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 16-25
        • Pimentel-Nunes P.
        • Dinis-Ribeiro M.
        • Ponchon T.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.
        Endoscopy. 2015; 47: 829-854
        • Oyama T.
        • Yahagi N.
        • Ponchon T.
        • et al.
        How to establish endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21: 11209-11220
        • Friedel D.
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        Introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West.
        World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 10: 225-238
        • Probst A.
        • Ebigbo A.
        • Märkl B.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 222-232
        • Geroski P.A.
        Models of technology diffusion.
        Res Policy. 2000; 29: 603-625
        • Rogers E.M.
        Diffusion of innovations.
        5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003
        • David Y.
        • Hyman W.A.
        Issues associated with off label use of medical devices.
        in: The 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2007: 3556-3558 (Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:3556-8)
        • Gulliford M.
        • Naithani S.
        • Morgan M.
        What is “continuity of care”?.
        J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006; 11: 248-250
        • Choi J.H.
        • Kim E.S.
        • Lee Y.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of quality of life and worry of cancer recurrence between endoscopic and surgical treatment for early gastric cancer.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82: 299-307