Advertisement

GIE Editorial Board Top 10: advances in GI endoscopy in 2021

Published:August 06, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.004
      The 9-member Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performed a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2021 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals on endoscopy-related topics. Votes from each editorial board member were tallied to identify a consensus list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy over the calendar year of study, with a focus on 3 criteria: significance, novelty, and global impact on clinical practice. The 10 areas identified collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic topics: colonoscopy optimization, bariatric endoscopy, endoscopic needle sampling and drainage, peroral endoscopic myotomy, endoscopic defect closure, meeting systemic challenges in endoscopic training and practice, endohepatology, FNA versus fine-needle biopsy sampling, endoscopic mucosal and submucosal procedures, and cold snare polypectomy. Each board member contributed a summary of important articles relevant to 1 to 2 of the consensus topic areas, leading to a collective summary that is presented in this document of the “top 10” endoscopic advances of 2021.

      Abbreviations:

      ADR (adenoma detection rate), AI (artificial intelligence), ASGE (American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), CADe (computer-assisted detection), CADx (computer-assisted diagnosis), CSP (cold snare polypectomy), DMR (duodenal mucosal resurfacing), ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection), EUS-LB (EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling), FNB (fine-needle biopsy), GIE (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), IGB (intragastric balloon), POEM (peroral endoscopic myotomy), RCT (randomized controlled trial), SSL (sessile serrated lesion), WE (water exchange)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Desilets D.J.
        • Hwang J.H.
        • Kyanam Kabir Baig K.R.
        • et al.
        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2017.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 88: 1-8
        • Cohen J.
        • Desilets D.J.
        • Hwang J.H.
        • et al.
        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2018.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90: 35-43
        • Hwang J.H.
        • Jamidar P.
        • Kyanam Kabir Baig K.R.
        • et al.
        GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2019.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92: 241-251
        • Chua T.Y.
        • Kyanam Kabir Baig K.R.
        • Leung F.W.
        • et al.
        GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2020.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 441-451
        • Burnham J.F.
        Scopus database: a review.
        Biomed Digit Libr. 2006; 3: 1
        • Cadoni S.
        • Ishaq S.
        • Hassan C.
        • et al.
        Water-assisted colonoscopy: an international modified Delphi review on definitions and practice recommendations.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1411-1420
        • Tseng C.W.
        • Hsieh Y.H.
        • Koo M.
        • et al.
        Comparing right colon adenoma detection rate during water exchange and air insufflation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26: 35-44
        • Cheng C.L.
        • Kuo Y.L.
        • Hsieh Y.H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of right colon adenoma miss rates between water exchange and carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021; 55: 869-875
        • Shao P.P.
        • Bui A.
        • Romero T.
        • et al.
        Adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates of water exchange, Endocuff, and cap colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis with pooled data of randomized controlled trials.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 66: 1175-1188
        • Shao P.P.
        • Shao C.R.
        • Romero T.
        • et al.
        Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate of water exchange, Endocuff, and cap colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36: 3268-3277
        • Weigt J.
        • Repici A.
        • Antonelli G.
        • et al.
        Performance of a new integrated computer-assisted system (CADe/CADx) for detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia.
        Endoscopy. 2022; 54: 180-184
        • Tang C.P.
        • Lin T.L.
        • Hsieh Y.H.
        • et al.
        Polyp detection and false-positive rates by computer-aided analysis of withdrawal-phase videos of colonoscopy of the right-sided colon segment in a randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 95: 1198-1206
        • Xu L.
        • He X.
        • Zhou J.
        • et al.
        Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection.
        Cancer Med. 2021; 10: 7184-7193
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Calderwood A.H.
        • Karnes W.
        • et al.
        Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 95: 512-518
        • Abu Dayyeh B.K.
        • Maselli D.B.
        • Rapaka B.
        • et al.
        Adjustable intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial.
        Lancet. 2021; 398: 1965-1973
        • Muniraj T.
        • Day L.W.
        • Teigen L.M.
        • et al.
        AGA clinical practice guidelines on intragastric balloons in the management of obesity.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 1799-1808
        • Haidry R.J.
        • van Baar A.C.
        • Galvao Neto M.P.
        • et al.
        Duodenal mucosal resurfacing: proof-of-concept, procedural development, and initial implementation in the clinical setting.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90: 673-681
        • Rajagopalan H.
        • Cherrington A.D.
        • Thompson C.C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: 6-month interim analysis from the first-in-human proof-of-concept study.
        Diabetes Care. 2016; 39: 2254-2261
        • van Baar A.C.G.
        • Holleman F.
        • Crenier L.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: one year results from the first international, open-label, prospective, multicentre study.
        Gut. 2020; 69: 295-303
        • Mingrone G.
        • van Baar A.C.
        • Devière J.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial.
        Gut. 2022; 71: 254-264
        • Mehta A.
        • Shah S.
        • Dawod E.
        • et al.
        Impact of adjunctive pharmacotherapy with intragastric balloons for the treatment of obesity.
        Am Surg. Epub 2021 Aug 12;
        • Badurdeen D.
        • Hoff A.C.
        • Hedjoudje A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty plus liraglutide versus endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty alone for weight loss.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1316-1324
        • van Baar A.C.G.
        • Meiring S.
        • Smeele P.
        • et al.
        Duodenal mucosal resurfacing combined with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism to discontinue insulin in type 2 diabetes: a feasibility study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 111-120
        • DeWitt J.M.
        • Arain M.
        • Chang K.J.
        • et al.
        Interventional endoscopic ultrasound: current status and future directions.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 24-40
        • Teoh A.Y.B.
        • Leung C.H.
        • Tam P.T.H.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided gallbladder drainage versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity score analysis with 1-year follow-up data.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 577-583
        • Venkatachalapathy S.V.
        • James M.W.
        • Huggett M.T.
        • et al.
        Utility of palliative EUS-guided biliary drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents: a prospective multicenter feasibility study (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 321-328
        • Runge T.M.
        • Chiang A.L.
        • Kowalski T.E.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE): a retrospective multicenter study.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 611-618
        • Bronswijk M.
        • Vanella G.
        • van Malenstein H.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic versus EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: an international multicenter propensity score-matched comparison (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 526-536
        • Nguyen N.Q.
        • Hamerski C.M.
        • Nett A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using an oroenteric catheter-assisted technique: a retrospective analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 1246-1249
        • Jovani M.
        • Ichkhanian Y.
        • Parsa N.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the learning curve for EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for a single operator.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1088-1093
        • Glissen Brown J.R.
        • Perumpail R.B.
        • Duran J.F.
        • et al.
        Preloaded 22-gauge fine-needle system facilitates placement of a higher number of fiducials for image-guided radiation therapy compared with traditional backloaded 19-gauge approach.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 953-958
        • Hanada Y.
        • Pereira S.P.
        • Pogue B.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided verteporfin photodynamic therapy for pancreatic cancer.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 179-186
        • Dacha S.
        • Aihara H.
        • Anand G.S.
        • et al.
        Core curriculum for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 539-543
        • Li Q.L.
        • Wu Q.N.
        • Zhang X.C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 1405-1412
        • Jirapinyo P.
        • Sethi A.
        • Abu Dayyeh B.K.
        • et al.
        Devices and techniques for flexible endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticulum (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 3-13
        • Bapaye A.
        • Dashatwar P.
        • Dharamsi S.
        • et al.
        Single-session endoscopic fundoplication after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM+F) for prevention of post gastroesophageal reflux—1-year follow-up study.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 1114-1121
        • Vosoughi K.
        • Ichkhanian Y.
        • Benias P.
        • et al.
        Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for refractory gastroparesis: results from an international prospective trial.
        Gut. 2022; 71: 25-33
        • Wagh M.S.
        • Draganov P.V.
        How to approach a patient with a Zenker's diverticulum.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 10-14
        • Al Ghamdi S.S.
        • Farha J.
        • Moran R.A.
        • et al.
        Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy, or flexible or rigid septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a multicenter retrospective comparison.
        Endoscopy. 2022; 54: 345-351
        • Zhang Q.
        • Jin H.Y.
        • Shen Z.H.
        • et al.
        Novel through-the-scope twin clip for the closure of GI wounds: the first experimental survival study in pigs (with videos).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 850-858
        • Jung D.H.
        • Huh C.W.
        • Min Y.W.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the management of upper GI leaks and perforations: a multicenter retrospective study of factors associated with treatment failure (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 95: 281-290
        • Tashiro K.
        • Takeno S.
        • Kawano F.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic filling with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue of persistent fistula after esophagectomy.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 288-292
        • Nachira D.
        • Trivisonno A.
        • Costamagna G.
        • et al.
        Successful therapy of esophageal fistulas by endoscopic injection of emulsified adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 1026-1028
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kedia P.
        • Stavropoulos S.N.
        • et al.
        AGA clinical practice update on endoscopic management of perforations in gastrointestinal tract: expert review.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 2252-2261
        • Jensen D.M.
        • Kovacs T.
        • Ghassemi K.A.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of over-the-scope clip as initial treatment of severe nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 2315-2323
        • Hussein M.
        • Alzoubaidi D.
        • Lopez M.F.
        • et al.
        Hemostatic spray powder TC-325 in the primary endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer-related bleeding: multicenter international registry.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 36-43
        • Vosko S.
        • Gupta S.
        • Shahidi N.
        • et al.
        Snare-tip soft coagulation is effective and efficient as a first-line modality for treating intraprocedural bleeding during Barrett's mucosectomy.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 511-516
        • Rabinowitz L.G.
        • Anandasabapathy S.
        • Sethi A.
        • et al.
        Addressing gender in gastroenterology: opportunities for change.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 155-161
        • Rabinowitz L.G.
        • Grinspan L.T.
        • Williams K.E.
        • et al.
        Gender dynamics in education and practice of gastroenterology.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1047-1056
        • Yu J.X.
        • Berzin T.M.
        • Enestvedt B.
        • et al.
        Gender disparities in advanced endoscopy fellowship.
        Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9: E338-E342
        • David Y.N.
        • Dixon R.E.
        • Kakked G.
        • et al.
        Gender-specific factors influencing gastroenterologists to pursue careers in advanced endoscopy: perceptions vs reality.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116: 539-550
        • David Y.N.
        • Dixon R.E.
        • Kakked G.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy and the working gastroenterologist: perceptions, realities, and systemic challenges.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 756-760
        • Khara H.S.
        • Suthar D.
        • Bergenstock M.
        • et al.
        Identifying gender barriers for colorectal cancer screening and assessing the need for a multigender endoscopy team: a prospective multicenter study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116: 1646-1656
        • Anglade P.
        • Ibrahim H.
        • Abdel-Razig S.
        Does provider gender matter in endoscopy? An international perspective.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1160-1168
        • Matharoo M.K.
        • Sethi A.
        • Charabaty A.
        Towards meaningful change: the future of gastroenterology belongs to women, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
        Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 6: 518-520
        • Rabinowitz L.G.
        • Rabinowitz D.G.
        Women on the frontline: a changed workforce and the fight against COVID-19.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96: 808-812
        • Annadurai V.
        • Blackett J.W.
        • Freedberg D.
        • et al.
        Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York.
        Dig Dis. 2021; 39: 663-672
        • Pacheco J.
        • Crispi F.
        • Alfaro T.
        • et al.
        Gender disparities in access to care for time-sensitive conditions during COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.
        BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 1802
        • Acuna-Villaorduna A.R.
        • Lin J.
        • Kim M.
        • et al.
        Racial/ethnic disparities in early-onset colorectal cancer: implications for a racial/ethnic-specific screening strategy.
        Cancer Med. 2021; 10: 2080-2087
        • Jones B.
        • Williams J.L.
        • Komanduri S.
        • et al.
        Racial disparities in adherence to quality indicators in Barrett's esophagus: an analysis using the GIQuIC National Benchmarking Registry.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116: 1201-1210
        • Pioche M.
        • Lambin T.
        • Rivory J.
        Let's urgently engage ourselves in "greening" endoscopy to address ecological issues!.
        Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9: E1752-E1753
        • Lipowska A.M.
        • Shergill A.K.
        Ergonomics of Endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2021; 31: 655-669
        • Campbell 3rd, E.V.
        • Muniraj T.
        • Aslanian H.R.
        • et al.
        Musculoskeletal pain symptoms and injuries among endoscopists who perform ERCP.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 66: 56-62
        • Park G.Y.
        Musculoskeletal pains and their risk factors in endoscopists.
        Clin Endosc. 2021; 54: 295-296
        • Markwell S.A.
        • Garman K.S.
        • Vance I.L.
        • et al.
        Individualized ergonomic wellness approach for the practicing gastroenterologist (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 248-259
        • Walsh C.M.
        • Qayed E.
        • Aihara H.
        • et al.
        Core curriculum for ergonomics in endoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1222-1227
        • Duong N.
        • Bollipo S.
        • Repaka A.
        • et al.
        When burn-out reaches a pandemic level in gastroenterology: a call for a more sustainable work-life balance.
        Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021; 12: 440-443
        • Pineda J.J.
        • Diehl D.L.
        • Miao C.L.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 360-365
        • Mohan B.P.
        • Shakhatreh M.
        • Garg R.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89: 238-246
        • Bazerbachi F.
        • Vargas E.J.
        • Matar R.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided core liver biopsy sampling using a 22-gauge fork-tip needle: a prospective blinded trial for histologic and lipidomic evaluation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90: 926-932
        • Mok S.R.S.
        • Diehl D.L.
        • Johal A.S.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles.
        Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7: E62-E71
        • Baran B.
        • Kale S.
        • Patil P.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 5546-5557
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Ward T.J.
        • Guirguis S.
        • et al.
        Radiology-guided percutaneous approach is superior to EUS for performing liver biopsies.
        Gut. 2021; 70: 2224
        • Hajifathalian K.
        • Chang K.J.
        • Sharaiha R.Z.
        Radiology-guided percutaneous approach is superior to EUS for performing liver biopsies.
        Gut. 2022; 71: 845
        • Madhok I.K.
        • Parsa N.
        • Nieto J.M.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.
        Clin Liver Dis. 2022; 26: 127-138
        • Aggarwal S.N.
        • Magdaleno T.
        • Klocksieben F.
        • et al.
        A prospective, head-to-head comparison of 2 EUS-guided liver biopsy needles in vivo.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1133-1138
        • Hashimoto R.
        • Lee D.P.
        • Samarasena J.B.
        • et al.
        Comparison of two specialized histology needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy: a pilot study.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 66: 1700-1706
        • Ching-Companioni R.A.
        • Johal A.S.
        • Confer B.D.
        • et al.
        Single-pass 1-needle actuation versus single-pass 3-needle actuation technique for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a randomized prospective trial (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 551-558
        • Zhang W.
        • Peng C.
        • Zhang S.
        • et al.
        EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 565-572
        • van Riet P.A.
        • Erler N.S.
        • Bruno M.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 411-423
        • Young Bang J.
        • Krall K.
        • Jhala N.
        • et al.
        Comparing needles and methods of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy to optimize specimen quality and diagnostic accuracy for patients with pancreatic masses in a randomized trial.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 825-835
        • Ashat M.
        • Klair J.S.
        • Rooney S.L.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial comparing the Franseen needle with the fork-tip needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 140-150
        • Crinò S.F.
        • Di Mitri R.
        • Nguyen N.Q.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 899-909
        • Oh D.
        • Kong J.
        • Ko S.W.
        • et al.
        A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study.
        Endoscopy. 2021; 53: 1122-1129
        • DiMaio C.J.
        • Kolb J.M.
        • Benias P.C.
        • et al.
        Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study.
        Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4: E974-E979
        • Draganov P.V.
        • Aihara H.
        • Karasik M.S.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection in North America: a large prospective multicenter study.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 2317-2327
        • Fleischmann C.
        • Probst A.
        • Ebigbo A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: results of 1000 neoplastic lesions from the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 1168-1178
        • Ngamruengphong S.
        • Ferri L.
        • Aihara H.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasia in a large cohort in North America.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 1611-1619
        • Codipilly D.C.
        • Dhaliwal L.
        • Oberoi M.
        • et al.
        Comparative outcomes of cap assisted endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 20: 65-73
        • Bordillon P.
        • Pioche M.
        • Wallenhorst T.
        • et al.
        Double-clip traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study of 599 consecutive cases (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 333-343
        • Pei Q.
        • Qiao H.
        • Zhang M.
        • et al.
        Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1038-1046
        • Ozeki Y.
        • Hirasawa K.
        • Ikeda R.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of water pressure endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors with submucosal fibrosis (with video).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 94: 607-617
        • Wang A.Y.
        • Hwang J.H.
        • Bhatt A.
        • et al.
        AGA clinical practice update on surveillance after pathologically curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia in the United States: commentary.
        Gastroenterology. 2021; 161: 2030-2040
        • Aihara H.
        • Dacha S.
        • Anand G.S.
        • et al.
        Core curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 1215-1221
        • McWhinney C.D.
        • Vemulapalli K.C.
        • El Rahyel A.
        • et al.
        Adverse events and residual lesion rate after cold endoscopic mucosal resection of serrated lesions ≥10 mm.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 93: 654-659
        • de Benito Sanz M.
        • Hernández L.
        • Garcia Martinez M.I.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
        Endoscopy. 2022; 54: 35-44
        • Kimoto Y.
        • Sakai E.
        • Inamoto R.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy without submucosal injection for large sessile serrated lesions: a prospective study.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 20: e132-e138
        • van Hattem W.A.
        • Shahidi N.
        • Vosko S.
        • et al.
        Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods.
        Gut. 2021; 70: 1691-1697