Skip to Main Content
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT



Property Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes
Advertisement
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Submit
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Log in
    • Submit
    • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Claim
Skip menu
  • Articles
    • Cover Image - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Volume 97, Issue 6
    • Latest

      • Articles in Press
      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
  • Publish
    • For Authors

      • Submit Article
        External Link
      • Guide for Authors
      • Aims & Scope
      • Open Access Information
        External Link
      • Researcher Academy
        External Link
      • Figure Color Scheme
  • Topics
    • Collections

      • Artificial Intelligence
      • COVID-19
      • Graphical Abstracts
  • Multimedia
      • Audio Monthly Podcasts
      • Audio Quarterly Podcasts
      • Author Interviews
      • Spanish Podcast
      • VideoGIE
      • Videos
  • CMEDirect Link
  • About
    • Society

      • About
      • Editorial Board
      • ASGE
        External Link
    • Journal Information

      • Aims & Scope
      • Editor Biographies
      • Permissions
      • Reprints
        External Link
      • Abstracting & Indexing
      • Conflicts of Interest
    • Companion Journals

      • VideoGIE
        External Link
      • iGIE
        External Link
    • Access

      • Subscribe
      • Activate Online Access
      • ASGE Members Log In
        External Link
  • Contact
    • Contact

      • Contact Us
      • Career Opportunities
        External Link
      • Advertise with Us
        External Link
      • Go to Product Catalog
        External Link
    • Follow Us

      • New Content Alerts
      • Twitter
        External Link
      • Facebook
        External Link
      • YouTube
        External Link
      • Journal Blog
        External Link
Advanced search
Advanced search

Please enter a term before submitting your search.

Ok

Login to your account

Show
Forgot password?
Don’t have an account?
Create a Free Account

If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password

If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password

Cancel
x

Filter:

Filters applied

  • Graphical Abstracts
  • EditorialRemove Editorial filter
  • Review ArticleRemove Review Article filter
  • 2018 - 2023Remove 2018 - 2023 filter
Clear all

Article Type

  • Research Article292

Author

  • Adler, Douglas G6
  • Mohan, Babu P6
  • Repici, Alessandro6
  • Chandan, Saurabh5
  • Hassan, Cesare5
  • Facciorusso, Antonio4
  • Ramai, Daryl4
  • Frazzoni, Leonardo3
  • Fuccio, Lorenzo3
  • Gkolfakis, Paraskevas3
  • Khan, Shahab R3
  • Abu Dayyeh, Barham K2
  • Anderloni, Andrea2
  • Antonelli, Giulio2
  • Bazerbachi, Fateh2
  • Carrara, Silvia2
  • Draganov, Peter V2
  • Forbes, Nauzer2
  • Iyer, Prasad G2
  • McCarty, Thomas R2
  • Ponnada, Suresh2
  • Tringali, Alberto2
  • Aepli, Patrick1
  • Afecto, Edgar1
  • Agnew, Paul1

Journal

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy38

Keyword

  • CI20
  • confidence interval20
  • RCT12
  • randomized controlled trial10
  • RR9
  • CRC8
  • colorectal cancer7
  • odds ratio7
  • OR7
  • risk ratio7
  • endoscopic submucosal dissection5
  • ESD5
  • GRADE5
  • NOS5
  • ADR4
  • IBD4
  • inflammatory bowel disease4
  • AE3
  • AI3
  • Barrett's esophagus2
  • BE2
  • CPT2
  • DCE2
  • EAC2
  • EFTR2

Access Filter

  • Open Access

Graphical Abstracts

38 Results
Subscribe to collection
  • Export
    • PDF
    • Citation

Please select at least one article in order to proceed.

Ok
FilterHide Filter
  • Editorial

    Automated artificial intelligence scoring systems for the endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis: How far are we from clinical application?

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Vol. 97Issue 2p347–349Published online: December 9, 2022
    • Alberto Murino
    • Alessandro Rimondi
    Cited in Scopus: 0
    Commentary on preceding article
    • Preview Hide Preview
    • Download PDF
    • Export Citation
      Artificial intelligence (AI) is going to drastically change our approach to diagnostic endoscopy. In contrast to its human counterpart, AI can manage an exceptional amount of data simultaneously, does not get fatigued, and can be highly effective and efficient. In the past couple of years, we have witnessed a literal blossom of AI systems applied to digestive endoscopy. Industries have been leading this first part of AI application, with the launch of real-time automated polyp detection and characterization systems to screening colonoscopy.
      Automated artificial intelligence scoring systems for the endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis: How far are we from clinical application?
    • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      Impact of second-generation transoral incisionless fundoplication on atypical GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Vol. 97Issue 3p394–406.e2Published online: November 16, 2022
      • Muhammad Haseeb
      • Jeremy R. Glissen Brown
      • Umar Hayat
      • Camden Bay
      • Paul A. Bain
      • Pichamol Jirapinyo
      • and others
      Cited in Scopus: 0
      Online Extra
      • Preview Hide Preview
      • Download PDF
      • Export Citation
        Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) using the EsophyX device (EndoGastric Solutions, Inc, Redmond, Wash, USA) is a minimally invasive endoscopic fundoplication technique. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of TIF for atypical GERD symptoms in patients with chronic or refractory GERD.
        Impact of second-generation transoral incisionless fundoplication on atypical GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

        Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
        Vol. 97Issue 3p415–421.e5Published online: November 14, 2022
        • Daryl Ramai
        • Ikponmwosa Enofe
        • Smit S. Deliwala
        • Daniel Mozell
        • Antonio Facciorusso
        • Paraskevas Gkolfakis
        • and others
        Cited in Scopus: 3
        Online ExtraAuthor interview series
        • Preview Hide Preview
        • Download PDF
        • Export Citation
          Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development.
          Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
        • Editorial

          Reduction in mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion is likely due to careful patient selection

          Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
          Vol. 96Issue 6p954–955Published online: October 21, 2022
          • Paul Agnew
          • Tony C.K. Tham
          Cited in Scopus: 0
          Commentary on preceding article
          • Preview Hide Preview
          • Download PDF
          • Export Citation
            The insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is an invaluable tool to gain long-term nutritional support for patients who cannot meet their nutritional needs for any of several reasons, with a vast volume of data showing that for certain conditions this procedure can improve patient outcomes. Unfortunately, PEG tube insertion has several adverse events, such as aspiration pneumonia, bleeding, infection, leakage, and tube dysfunction or displacement. Minor adverse events can be common and under-reported; more major adverse events arise in approximately 3% of PEG tube insertions.
          • Systematic review and meta-analysis

            Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis

            Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
            Vol. 96Issue 5p712–720.e7Published online: July 5, 2022
            • Jay Bapaye
            • Saurabh Chandan
            • Le Yu Naing
            • Ahmed Shehadah
            • Smit Deliwala
            • Varun Bhalla
            • and others
            Cited in Scopus: 3
            Online ExtraCME examination articleAuthor interview series
            • Preview Hide Preview
            • Download PDF
            • Export Citation
              Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is a common condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic hemostasis remains the mainstay of therapy and is mainly aimed at effective hemostasis and prevention of rebleeding. Lesions with high-risk stigmata can have rebleeding rates of as high as 26.3%. Rebleeding is associated with increased mortality and reduced success rates of endoscopic retreatment. The over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) is a device with widespread endoscopic indications including hemostasis for nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB).
              Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis
            • Review article

              Robotics in therapeutic endoscopy (with video)

              Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
              Vol. 96Issue 3p402–410Published online: June 3, 2022
              • YongYan Cui
              • Christopher C. Thompson
              • Philip Wai Yan Chiu
              • Seth A. Gross
              Cited in Scopus: 1
              Online video
              • Preview Hide Preview
              • Download PDF
              • Export Citation
              • Video
              Since its inception, endoscopy has evolved from a solely diagnostic procedure to an expanding therapeutic field within gastroenterology. The incorporation of robotics in gastroenterology initially addressed shortcomings of flexible endoscopes in natural orifice transluminal endoscopy. Developing therapeutic endoscopic robotic platforms now offer operators improved ergonomics, visualization, dexterity, precision, and control and the possibility of increasing proficiency and standardization of complex endoscopic procedures including endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and endoscopic suturing.
              Robotics in therapeutic endoscopy (with video)
            • Systematic review and meta-analysis

              Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials

              Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
              Vol. 96Issue 5p721–731.e2Published online: June 3, 2022
              • Nauzer Forbes
              • Sunil Gupta
              • Levi Frehlich
              • Zhao Wu Meng
              • Yibing Ruan
              • Sheyla Montori
              • and others
              Cited in Scopus: 4
              Online Extra
              • Preview Hide Preview
              • Download PDF
              • Export Citation
                After EMR, prophylactic clipping is often performed to prevent clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and other adverse events (AEs). Prior evidence syntheses have lacked sufficient power to assess clipping in relevant subgroups or in nonbleeding AEs. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials assessing the efficacy of clipping to prevent AEs after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm.
                Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials
              • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                Vol. 96Issue 2p208–222.e14Published online: April 9, 2022
                • Babu P. Mohan
                • Shahab R. Khan
                • Evan Daugherty
                • Saurabh Chandan
                • Suresh Ponnada
                • Antonio Facciorusso
                • and others
                Cited in Scopus: 0
                Online Extra
                • Preview Hide Preview
                • Download PDF
                • Export Citation
                  Current adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopy in individuals positive for a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are ≥45% in men and ≥35% in women. These are based on weak, low-quality evidence. We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled ADR in FIT-positive colonoscopy.
                  Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                  Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

                  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                  Vol. 95Issue 6p1067–1077.e15Published online: February 3, 2022
                  • Paraskevas Gkolfakis
                  • Stefano Francesco Crinò
                  • Georgios Tziatzios
                  • Daryl Ramai
                  • Apostolis Papaefthymiou
                  • Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
                  • and others
                  Cited in Scopus: 31
                  Online ExtraCME examination article
                  • Preview Hide Preview
                  • Download PDF
                  • Export Citation
                    Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
                    Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis
                  • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                    Diagnostic and therapeutic yields of early capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy in the setting of overt GI bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis

                    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                    Vol. 95Issue 4p610–625.e9Published online: December 20, 2021
                    • Maria Manuela Estevinho
                    • Rolando Pinho
                    • Carlos Fernandes
                    • Adélia Rodrigues
                    • Ana Ponte
                    • Ana Catarina Gomes
                    • and others
                    Cited in Scopus: 7
                    Online ExtraCME examination article
                    • Preview Hide Preview
                    • Download PDF
                    • Export Citation
                      Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) are essential in obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) management. However, the best timing for such procedures remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to compare, for the first time, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, detection of active bleeding and vascular lesions, recurrent bleeding, and mortality of “early” versus “nonearly” SBCE and DAE.
                      Diagnostic and therapeutic yields of early capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy in the setting of overt GI bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
                    • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                      Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                      Vol. 95Issue 2p216–224.e18Published online: October 7, 2021
                      • Russell D. Dolan
                      • Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
                      • Thomas R. McCarty
                      • Christopher C. Thompson
                      • Hiroyuki Aihara
                      Cited in Scopus: 12
                      Online Extra
                      • Preview Hide Preview
                      • Download PDF
                      • Export Citation
                        Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel endoscopic technique for the resection of GI lesions not amenable to standard endoscopic therapy. The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate EFTR for the resection of colorectal lesions.
                        Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                        Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis

                        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                        Vol. 95Issue 1p60–71.e12Published online: September 16, 2021
                        • Antonio Facciorusso
                        • Daryl Ramai
                        • Paraskevas Gkolfakis
                        • Shahab R. Khan
                        • Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
                        • Konstantinos Triantafyllou
                        • and others
                        Cited in Scopus: 13
                        Online ExtraCME examination article
                        • Preview Hide Preview
                        • Download PDF
                        • Export Citation
                          Several methods with variable efficacy have been proposed for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP. We assessed the comparative efficacy of different strategies for difficult biliary cannulation through a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect treatment comparisons.
                          Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis
                        • Review article

                          Beyond the SCENIC route: updates in chromoendoscopy and dysplasia screening in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

                          Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                          Vol. 95Issue 1p30–37Published online: August 4, 2021
                          • Loren Galler Rabinowitz
                          • Nikhil A. Kumta
                          • James F. Marion
                          Cited in Scopus: 11
                          Author interview series
                          • Preview Hide Preview
                          • Download PDF
                          • Export Citation
                            Patients with Crohn’s disease affecting the colon and ulcerative colitis are known to be at increased risk for the development of dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC).1,2 Unlike patients with sporadic CRC, patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who develop malignancy do so through different pathophysiologic mechanisms and with foreshortened time frames.3,4 Furthermore, the gross appearance of dysplasia exhibits greater morphologic range in IBD patients, with subtler, flat lesions being commonplace.
                            Beyond the SCENIC route: updates in chromoendoscopy and dysplasia screening in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
                          • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                            Pancreatic cyst fluid glucose in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                            Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                            Vol. 94Issue 4p698–712.e6Published online: May 5, 2021
                            • Thomas R. McCarty
                            • Rajat Garg
                            • Tarun Rustagi
                            Cited in Scopus: 26
                            Online ExtraCME examination article
                            • Preview Hide Preview
                            • Download PDF
                            • Export Citation
                              Recently, low levels of intracystic glucose acquired with EUS-guided pancreatic cyst fluid sampling have been shown to help to differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous cystic neoplasms. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of pancreatic cyst fluid glucose compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for pancreatic cystic lesions.
                              Pancreatic cyst fluid glucose in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                            • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                              Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis

                              Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                              Vol. 94Issue 3p471–482.e9Published online: December 28, 2020
                              • Saurabh Chandan
                              • Shahab R. Khan
                              • Anand Kumar
                              • Babu P. Mohan
                              • Daryl Ramai
                              • Lena L. Kassab
                              • and others
                              Cited in Scopus: 14
                              Online ExtraAuthor interview seriesCME examination article
                              • Preview Hide Preview
                              • Download PDF
                              • Export Citation
                                Major limitations with conventional EMR (C-EMR) include high rates of polyp recurrence and low en-bloc resection rates, especially for lesions >20 mm in size. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has emerged as an alternate technique for en-bloc resection of larger lesions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of the 2 techniques.
                                Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis
                              • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis

                                Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                Vol. 93Issue 2p378–389Published online: October 14, 2020
                                • Alyssa Y. Choi
                                • Zain Moosvi
                                • Sagar Shah
                                • Mary Kathryn Roccato
                                • Andrew Y. Wang
                                • Christopher M. Hamerski
                                • and others
                                Cited in Scopus: 17
                                CME examination article
                                • Preview Hide Preview
                                • Download PDF
                                • Export Citation
                                  Underwater EMR (UEMR) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional EMR (CEMR) for the resection of colorectal polyps. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare UEMR and CEMR for the resection of colorectal polyps with respect to efficacy and safety.
                                  Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis
                                • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                  Endoscopic full-thickness suturing plus argon plasma mucosal coagulation versus argon plasma mucosal coagulation alone for weight regain after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                                  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                  Vol. 92Issue 6p1164–1175.e6Published online: July 18, 2020
                                  • Veeravich Jaruvongvanich
                                  • Kornpong Vantanasiri
                                  • Passisd Laoveeravat
                                  • Reem H. Matar
                                  • Eric J. Vargas
                                  • Daniel B. Maselli
                                  • and others
                                  Cited in Scopus: 13
                                  Online ExtraAuthor interview series
                                  • Preview Hide Preview
                                  • Download PDF
                                  • Export Citation
                                    Endoscopic transoral outlet reduction (TORe) has been used to manage weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the efficacy and safety of the two most commonly used techniques: full-thickness suturing plus argon plasma mucosal coagulation (ft-TORe) and argon plasma mucosal coagulation alone (APMC-TORe).
                                    Endoscopic full-thickness suturing plus argon plasma mucosal coagulation versus argon plasma mucosal coagulation alone for weight regain after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                                  • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                    Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                                    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                    Vol. 93Issue 1p77–85.e6Published online: June 26, 2020
                                    • Cesare Hassan
                                    • Marco Spadaccini
                                    • Andrea Iannone
                                    • Roberta Maselli
                                    • Manol Jovani
                                    • Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar
                                    • and others
                                    Cited in Scopus: 162
                                    Online Extra
                                    • Preview Hide Preview
                                    • Download PDF
                                    • Export Citation
                                      One-fourth of colorectal neoplasia are missed at screening colonoscopy, representing the main cause of interval colorectal cancer. Deep learning systems with real-time computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) showed high accuracy in artificial settings, and preliminary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported favorable outcomes in the clinical setting. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize available RCTs on the performance of CADe systems in colorectal neoplasia detection.
                                      Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                                    • Review article

                                      Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis: a review of established techniques

                                      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                      Vol. 93Issue 1p34–46Published online: June 25, 2020
                                      • Mohamad Kareem Marrache
                                      • Mohamad I. Itani
                                      • Jad Farha
                                      • Lea Fayad
                                      • Sima L. Sharara
                                      • Anthony N. Kalloo
                                      • and others
                                      Cited in Scopus: 17
                                      • Preview Hide Preview
                                      • Download PDF
                                      • Export Citation
                                        Technologic advancements in the field of therapeutic endoscopy have led to the development of minimally invasive techniques to create GI anastomosis without requiring surgery. Examples of the potential clinical applications include bypassing malignant and benign gastric outlet obstruction, providing access to the pancreatobiliary tree in those who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and relieving pancreatobiliary symptoms in afferent loop syndrome. Endoscopic GI anastomosis is less invasive and less expensive than surgical approaches, result in improved outcomes, and therefore are more appealing to patients and providers.
                                        Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis: a review of established techniques
                                      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                        Covered versus uncovered metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                                        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                        Vol. 92Issue 6p1153–1163.e9Published online: June 17, 2020
                                        • Alberto Tringali
                                        • Deborah Costa
                                        • Andrea Anderloni
                                        • Silvia Carrara
                                        • Alessandro Repici
                                        • Douglas G. Adler
                                        Cited in Scopus: 8
                                        Online ExtraCME examination articleAuthor interview series
                                        • Preview Hide Preview
                                        • Download PDF
                                        • Export Citation
                                          Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are used for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Studies comparing covered SEMSs (C-SEMSs) and uncovered SEMSs (U-SEMSs) have led to inconclusive results. We compared efficacy and safety of C-SEMSs versus U-SEMSs in patients with GOO.
                                          Covered versus uncovered metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                                        • Review article

                                          The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging

                                          Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                          Vol. 92Issue 5p1016–1025Published online: June 2, 2020
                                          • Dennis Yang
                                          • Mihir S. Wagh
                                          • Peter V. Draganov
                                          Cited in Scopus: 19
                                          • Preview Hide Preview
                                          • Download PDF
                                          • Export Citation
                                            The landscape of advanced endoscopy continues to evolve as new technologies and techniques become available. Although postgraduate advanced endoscopy fellowships have traditionally centered on ERCP and diagnostic EUS, the breadth of training has increased over the years in response to the ever-growing demand for therapeutic endoscopy. The increasing diversity and complexity of emerging endoscopic techniques accompanied by the shift in focus toward competency-based medical education requires innovative changes to the curriculum that will ensure adequate training yet without compromising best patient practices.
                                            The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging
                                          • Review article

                                            A primer on artificial intelligence and its application to endoscopy

                                            Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                            Vol. 92Issue 4p813–820.e4Published online: May 6, 2020
                                            • Daljeet Chahal
                                            • Michael F. Byrne
                                            Cited in Scopus: 28
                                            Online ExtraAuthor interview series
                                            • Preview Hide Preview
                                            • Download PDF
                                            • Export Citation
                                              Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful and exciting new technology poised to impact many aspects of health care. In endoscopy, AI is now being used to detect and characterize benign and malignant GI lesions and assess malignant lesion depth of invasion. It will undoubtedly also find use in capsule endoscopy and inflammatory bowel disease. Herein, we provide the general endoscopist with a brief overview of AI and its emerging uses in our field. We also touch on the challenges of incorporating AI into clinical practice, such as workflow integration, data storage, and data privacy.
                                              A primer on artificial intelligence and its application to endoscopy
                                            • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                              Low-residual diet versus clear-liquid diet for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

                                              Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                              Vol. 92Issue 3p508–518.e3Published online: May 3, 2020
                                              • Xubing Zhang
                                              • Qingbin Wu
                                              • Mingtian Wei
                                              • Yanling Ding
                                              • Chaoyang Gu
                                              • Sheng Liu
                                              • and others
                                              Cited in Scopus: 10
                                              Online Extra
                                              • Preview Hide Preview
                                              • Download PDF
                                              • Export Citation
                                                The aim of this study was to compare a low-residual diet (LRD) with a clear-liquid diet (CLD) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
                                                Low-residual diet versus clear-liquid diet for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
                                              • Review article

                                                EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pathologist’s guide for the endoscopist

                                                Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                                Vol. 92Issue 2p252–258Published online: April 22, 2020
                                                • Charlotte Vestrup Rift
                                                • Bojan Kovacevic
                                                • Anders Toxværd
                                                • Pia Klausen
                                                • Carsten Palnæs Hansen
                                                • Peter Vilmann
                                                • and others
                                                Cited in Scopus: 9
                                                Author interview series
                                                • Preview Hide Preview
                                                • Download PDF
                                                • Export Citation
                                                  Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are often an incidental finding related to the increased use of cross-sectional imaging,1 and risk stratification and management are a challenge for the multidisciplinary team. EUS examination with FNA of cyst fluid for cytology serves as a cornerstone in the evaluation of PCLs with worrisome features.2 However, microscopic evaluation of cytology samples is a challenge for the pathologist, and the reported sensitivity for the differentiation between mucinous and nonmucinous cysts is as low as 54%.
                                                  EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pathologist’s guide for the endoscopist
                                                • Systematic review and meta-analysis

                                                  Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis

                                                  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                                                  Vol. 92Issue 5p1030–1040.e9Published online: April 21, 2020
                                                  • Kirles Bishay
                                                  • Natalia Causada-Calo
                                                  • Michael A. Scaffidi
                                                  • Catharine M. Walsh
                                                  • John T. Anderson
                                                  • Alaa Rostom
                                                  • and others
                                                  Cited in Scopus: 27
                                                  Online ExtraCME examination article
                                                  • Preview Hide Preview
                                                  • Download PDF
                                                  • Export Citation
                                                    Colonoscopy quality indicators such as adenoma detection rate (ADR) are surrogates for the effectiveness of screening-related colonoscopy. It is unclear whether endoscopist feedback on these indicators improves performance. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether associations exist between endoscopist feedback and colonoscopy performance.
                                                    Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis
                                                  Display
                                                  • 25
                                                  • 50
                                                  • 100
                                                  results per page
                                                  Page 1 of 2next
                                                  • Home
                                                  • Articles & Issues
                                                  • Articles In Press
                                                  • Current Issue
                                                  • List of Issues
                                                  • Supplements
                                                  • Multimedia
                                                  • Audio Monthly Podcasts
                                                  • Audio Quarterly Podcasts
                                                  • Author Interviews
                                                  • Spanish Podcast
                                                  • VideoGIE
                                                  • Videos
                                                  • CME
                                                  • Artificial Intelligence
                                                  • Graphical Abstracts
                                                  • For Authors
                                                  • About Open Access
                                                  • Author Information
                                                  • Figure Color Scheme
                                                  • Permission to Reuse
                                                  • Researcher Academy
                                                  • Submit Your Manuscript
                                                  • Journal Blog
                                                  • Journal Info
                                                  • About the Journal
                                                  • About Open Access
                                                  • Abstracting/Indexing
                                                  • Activate Online Access
                                                  • Career Opportunities
                                                  • Contact Information
                                                  • Conflicts of Interest
                                                  • Editor Biographies
                                                  • Editorial Board
                                                  • Info for Advertisers
                                                  • Pricing
                                                  • Reprints
                                                  • New Content Alerts
                                                  • Subscribe
                                                  • ASGE
                                                  • ASGE Information
                                                  • ASGE Website
                                                  • ASGE Members Log In
                                                  • More Periodicals
                                                  • Find a Periodical
                                                  • Go to Product Catalog
                                                  • ASGE
                                                  • Follow Us
                                                  • YouTube
                                                  • Twitter
                                                  • Facebook

                                                  The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.



                                                  We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
                                                  Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.

                                                  • Privacy Policy  
                                                  • Terms and Conditions  
                                                  • Accessibility  
                                                  • Help & Contact

                                                  RELX