x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Graphical Abstracts
- Mohan, Babu PRemove Mohan, Babu P filter
- 2018 - 2023Remove 2018 - 2023 filter
Author
- Adler, Douglas G6
- Chandan, Saurabh5
- Facciorusso, Antonio3
- Kassab, Lena L3
- Khan, Shahab R3
- Ponnada, Suresh3
- Ramai, Daryl3
- Gkolfakis, Paraskevas2
- Anderloni, Andrea1
- Asokkumar, Ravishankar1
- Chandna, Shaun1
- Daugherty, Evan1
- Deliwala, Smit S1
- Draganov, Peter V1
- Enofe, Ikponmwosa1
- Garg, Rajat1
- Iyer, Prasad G1
- Jayaraj, Mahendran1
- Katzka, David A1
- Kochhar, Gursimran S1
- Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh1
- Kumar, Anand1
- Maida, Marcello1
- Mozell, Daniel1
Graphical Abstracts
7 Results
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 97Issue 3p415–421.e5Published online: November 14, 2022- Daryl Ramai
- Ikponmwosa Enofe
- Smit S. Deliwala
- Daniel Mozell
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 96Issue 2p208–222.e14Published online: April 9, 2022- Babu P. Mohan
- Shahab R. Khan
- Evan Daugherty
- Saurabh Chandan
- Suresh Ponnada
- Antonio Facciorusso
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Current adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopy in individuals positive for a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are ≥45% in men and ≥35% in women. These are based on weak, low-quality evidence. We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled ADR in FIT-positive colonoscopy. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 95Issue 1p60–71.e12Published online: September 16, 2021- Antonio Facciorusso
- Daryl Ramai
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Shahab R. Khan
- Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 10Several methods with variable efficacy have been proposed for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP. We assessed the comparative efficacy of different strategies for difficult biliary cannulation through a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect treatment comparisons. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 94Issue 6p1021–1029.e10Published online: September 1, 2021- Babu P. Mohan
- Gregory Toy
- Lena L. Kassab
- Suresh Ponnada
- Saurabh Chandan
- Sheeva Parbhu
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is typically treated by endoscopic thermal therapies. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has been reported in the treatment of GAVE with encouraging results. However, EBL is not widely used to this end. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 94Issue 3p471–482.e9Published online: December 28, 2020- Saurabh Chandan
- Shahab R. Khan
- Anand Kumar
- Babu P. Mohan
- Daryl Ramai
- Lena L. Kassab
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 12Major limitations with conventional EMR (C-EMR) include high rates of polyp recurrence and low en-bloc resection rates, especially for lesions >20 mm in size. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has emerged as an alternate technique for en-bloc resection of larger lesions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of the 2 techniques. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Risk of progression in Barrett’s esophagus indefinite for dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 91Issue 1p3–10.e3Published online: August 14, 2019- Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
- Babu P. Mohan
- Mahendran Jayaraj
- Kenneth K. Wang
- David A. Katzka
- Andrew Ross
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 20Risk of progression in Barrett's esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has been established. However, the natural history of BE with indefinite dysplasia (BE-IND) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled risk of progression to HGD and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE-IND. - Systematic review and meta-analysis
Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 89Issue 2p238–246.e3Published online: October 31, 2018- Babu P. Mohan
- Mohammed Shakhatreh
- Rajat Garg
- Suresh Ponnada
- Douglas G. Adler
Cited in Scopus: 76EUS-guided liver biopsy (LB) is an emerging technique over conventional percutaneous (PC) or transjugular (TJ) approaches. Recent studies have reported that EUS-guided LB may have a better safety profile than PC LB or TJ LB without compromising diagnostic yield, and the outcomes are varied with respect to the types of biopsy needles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic yield, specimen adequacy, and adverse events associated with EUS-guided LB.