Skip to Main Content
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT



Property Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes
Advertisement
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Submit
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Log in
    • Submit
    • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Claim
Skip menu
  • Articles
    • Cover Image - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Volume 97, Issue 6
    • Latest

      • Articles in Press
      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
    • Popular Articles

      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

        Comparative diagnostic performance of different techniques for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

          Facciorusso et al.
      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

        Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

          Gkolfakis et al.
      • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

        Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

          Hassan et al.
    • Latest Articles

  • Publish
    • For Authors

      • Submit Article
        External Link
      • Guide for Authors
      • Aims & Scope
      • Open Access Information
        External Link
      • Researcher Academy
        External Link
      • Figure Color Scheme
  • Topics
    • Collections

      • Artificial Intelligence
      • COVID-19
      • Graphical Abstracts
  • Multimedia
      • Audio Monthly Podcasts
      • Audio Quarterly Podcasts
      • Author Interviews
      • Spanish Podcast
      • VideoGIE
      • Videos
  • CMEDirect Link
  • About
    • Society

      • About
      • Editorial Board
      • ASGE
        External Link
    • Journal Information

      • Aims & Scope
      • Editor Biographies
      • Permissions
      • Reprints
        External Link
      • Abstracting & Indexing
      • Conflicts of Interest
    • Companion Journals

      • VideoGIE
        External Link
      • iGIE
        External Link
    • Access

      • Subscribe
      • Activate Online Access
      • ASGE Members Log In
        External Link
  • Contact
    • Contact

      • Contact Us
      • Career Opportunities
        External Link
      • Advertise with Us
        External Link
      • Go to Product Catalog
        External Link
    • Follow Us

      • New Content Alerts
      • Twitter
        External Link
      • Facebook
        External Link
      • YouTube
        External Link
      • Journal Blog
        External Link
Advanced search
Advanced search

Please enter a term before submitting your search.

Ok

Login to your account

Show
Forgot password?
Don’t have an account?
Create a Free Account

If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password

If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password

Cancel
x

Filter:

Filters applied

  • Graphical Abstracts
  • Review ArticleRemove Review Article filter
  • randomized controlled trialRemove randomized controlled trial filter
  • 2022 - 2023Remove 2022 - 2023 filter
Clear all

Article Type

  • Research Article6

Author

  • Albéniz, Eduardo1
  • Arvanitakis, Marianna1
  • Bapaye, Jay1
  • Bhalla, Varun1
  • Bourke, Michael J1
  • Carrara, Silvia1
  • Chandan, Saurabh1
  • Chathuranga, Dileepa1
  • Chebaa, Benjamin R1
  • Crinò, Stefano Francesco1
  • Deliwala, Smit1
  • Dunbar, Kerry B1
  • Facciorusso, Antonio1
  • Feagins, Linda A1
  • Forbes, Nauzer1
  • Frehlich, Levi1
  • Fusaroli, Pietro1
  • Gkolfakis, Paraskevas1
  • Gupta, Sunil1
  • Hassan, Cesare1
  • Heitman, Steven J1
  • Lisotti, Andrea1
  • Mangiavillano, Benedetto1
  • Meng, Zhao Wu1
  • Montori, Sheyla1

Journal

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy3

Keyword

  • CI3
  • confidence interval3
  • RCT3
  • RR3
  • adverse event2
  • AE2
  • GRADE2
  • Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation2
  • risk ratio2
  • CSPEB1
  • EUS-guided tissue acquisition1
  • EUS-TA1
  • FNB1
  • IPD1
  • LNPCP1
  • NVUGIB1
  • OR1
  • OTSC1
  • PPS1
  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses1
  • PRISMA1
  • ROSE1
  • STD1
  • SUCRA1

Access Filter

  • Open Access

Graphical Abstracts

3 Results
Subscribe to collection
  • Export
    • PDF
    • Citation

Please select at least one article in order to proceed.

Ok
FilterHide Filter
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Vol. 96Issue 5p712–720.e7Published online: July 5, 2022
    • Jay Bapaye
    • Saurabh Chandan
    • Le Yu Naing
    • Ahmed Shehadah
    • Smit Deliwala
    • Varun Bhalla
    • and others
    Cited in Scopus: 3
    Online ExtraCME examination articleAuthor interview series
    • Preview Hide Preview
    • Download PDF
    • Export Citation
      Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is a common condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic hemostasis remains the mainstay of therapy and is mainly aimed at effective hemostasis and prevention of rebleeding. Lesions with high-risk stigmata can have rebleeding rates of as high as 26.3%. Rebleeding is associated with increased mortality and reduced success rates of endoscopic retreatment. The over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) is a device with widespread endoscopic indications including hemostasis for nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB).
      Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis
    • Systematic review and meta-analysis

      Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials

      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Vol. 96Issue 5p721–731.e2Published online: June 3, 2022
      • Nauzer Forbes
      • Sunil Gupta
      • Levi Frehlich
      • Zhao Wu Meng
      • Yibing Ruan
      • Sheyla Montori
      • and others
      Cited in Scopus: 5
      Online Extra
      • Preview Hide Preview
      • Download PDF
      • Export Citation
        After EMR, prophylactic clipping is often performed to prevent clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and other adverse events (AEs). Prior evidence syntheses have lacked sufficient power to assess clipping in relevant subgroups or in nonbleeding AEs. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials assessing the efficacy of clipping to prevent AEs after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm.
        Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials
      • Systematic review and meta-analysis

        Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

        Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
        Vol. 95Issue 6p1067–1077.e15Published online: February 3, 2022
        • Paraskevas Gkolfakis
        • Stefano Francesco Crinò
        • Georgios Tziatzios
        • Daryl Ramai
        • Apostolis Papaefthymiou
        • Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
        • and others
        Cited in Scopus: 34
        Online ExtraCME examination article
        • Preview Hide Preview
        • Download PDF
        • Export Citation
          Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
          Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis
        Page 1 of 1
        • Home
        • Articles & Issues
        • Articles In Press
        • Current Issue
        • List of Issues
        • Supplements
        • Multimedia
        • Audio Monthly Podcasts
        • Audio Quarterly Podcasts
        • Author Interviews
        • Spanish Podcast
        • VideoGIE
        • Videos
        • CME
        • Artificial Intelligence
        • Graphical Abstracts
        • For Authors
        • About Open Access
        • Author Information
        • Figure Color Scheme
        • Permission to Reuse
        • Researcher Academy
        • Submit Your Manuscript
        • Journal Blog
        • Journal Info
        • About the Journal
        • About Open Access
        • Abstracting/Indexing
        • Activate Online Access
        • Career Opportunities
        • Contact Information
        • Conflicts of Interest
        • Editor Biographies
        • Editorial Board
        • Info for Advertisers
        • Pricing
        • Reprints
        • New Content Alerts
        • Subscribe
        • ASGE
        • ASGE Information
        • ASGE Website
        • ASGE Members Log In
        • More Periodicals
        • Find a Periodical
        • Go to Product Catalog
        • ASGE
        • Follow Us
        • YouTube
        • Twitter
        • Facebook

        The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.



        We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
        Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.

        • Privacy Policy  
        • Terms and Conditions  
        • Accessibility  
        • Help & Contact

        RELX